Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Chinese carmaker BYD’s offices in Netherlands raided over JLR ‘copycat car’ claim | Jaguar Land Rover

    Talk of Hegseth Impeachment Grows After Democratic Midterm Sweep

    The Guardian view on a tale of two activists: Joshua Wong and Au Kam San should not be behind bars | Editorial

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    Naija Global News |
    Monday, November 9
    • Business
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Education
    • Social Issues
    • Technology
    • More
      • Crime & Justice
      • Environment
      • Entertainment
    Naija Global News |
    You are at:Home»Crime & Justice»Ban corporate donations to UK political parties to protect elections, says thinktank | Party funding
    Crime & Justice

    Ban corporate donations to UK political parties to protect elections, says thinktank | Party funding

    onlyplanz_80y6mtBy onlyplanz_80y6mtMarch 19, 2026003 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Ban corporate donations to UK political parties to protect elections, says thinktank | Party funding
    ‘We won’t let hostile foreign states use dirty money to buy our elections,’ said Steve Reed, the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government, who introduced the bill last month. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing/Getty Images
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Political donations by companies should be banned to protect UK elections from foreign interference, a thinktank has warned.

    In the first big overhaul of election funding in 26 years, ministers have pledged to “keep British democracy safe” by closing a loophole that allows individuals not eligible to vote in Britain to donate to political parties through UK-registered companies.

    The representation of the people bill, being debated in parliament, will oblige corporate donors to show they are controlled by UK electors or citizens.

    However, in a report published today, the Centre for the Analysis of Taxation (CenTax) claims the new legislation will not solve the problem.

    Sebastian Gazmuri-Barker, a senior legal analyst at CenTax, said the bill’s proposed tests “contain loopholes that are easily exploitable”.

    “Parliament should either ban corporate donations outright or significantly strengthen the approach,” he said.

    By matching the name of companies declared as donors to ownership records, researchers at the thinktank found that between 2001 and 2024, over 4000 companies had donated £293m, with big surges ahead of general elections.

    Almost £1 in every £10 came from corporations controlled by individuals who would not have been eligible to donate directly. CenTax found their donations were on average almost twice as large as those from companies with UK-eligible owners.

    The estimates are likely to be conservative, since the true extent of foreign interference is obscured by opaque corporate structures.

    The researchers found a quarter of the money was not traceable because the owner of the company could not be identified. “The bill’s reforms are easy to dodge,” the report states.

    Details of company ownership are kept at Companies House, where data has been criticised as unreliable and incomplete. CenTax is critical of the fact that the new legislation will continue to rely on Companies House data rather than obliging the Electoral Commission to collect the information.

    In the absence of a ban on corporate donors, CenTax is calling for all but the smallest donors – both individuals and companies – to be required to register with the Electoral Commission before they can give any money, and says disclosure of the ultimate controllers of companies should be mandatory.

    Introducing the bill last month, Steve Reed, the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government, said: “Growing threats from abroad mean we must make changes to keep our elections secure. We won’t let hostile foreign states use dirty money to buy our elections. We are keeping British democracy safe for British people.”

    The legislation requires companies to be majority owned or controlled by UK citizens and registered electors, headquartered in the UK, and have enough income to fund donations.

    The reforms were given new impetus after reports that Elon Musk was considering donating to Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party.

    “Around a quarter of money donated by companies is completely untraceable, and at least one pound in 10 comes from individuals who could not donate directly,” said the CenTax director, Arun Advani. “The bill is a welcome opportunity to fix this, but its current provisions won’t do so and risk providing a false sense of security.”

    Ban corporate Donations elections funding parties party political Protect thinktank
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticlePossum found in Hobart airport gift shop's toy section – video
    Next Article Instagram worse for mental health than WhatsApp, global study finds | Social media
    onlyplanz_80y6mt
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Chinese carmaker BYD’s offices in Netherlands raided over JLR ‘copycat car’ claim | Jaguar Land Rover

    November 8, 2026

    Talk of Hegseth Impeachment Grows After Democratic Midterm Sweep

    November 8, 2026

    The Guardian view on a tale of two activists: Joshua Wong and Au Kam San should not be behind bars | Editorial

    November 8, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The science influencers going viral on TikTok to fight misinformation

    February 17, 20263 Views

    MPs vote against legalising assisted dying in England and Wales | Assisted dying

    September 11, 20262 Views

    The backlash to revelations of sexual torture of Palestinian prisoners aims to raise the cost of speaking out | Yuli Novak

    May 14, 20262 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    At Chile’s Vera Rubin Observatory, Earth’s Largest Camera Surveys the Sky

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    SpaceX Starship Explodes Before Test Fire

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    How the L.A. Port got hit by Trump’s Tariffs

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    The science influencers going viral on TikTok to fight misinformation

    February 17, 20263 Views

    MPs vote against legalising assisted dying in England and Wales | Assisted dying

    September 11, 20262 Views

    The backlash to revelations of sexual torture of Palestinian prisoners aims to raise the cost of speaking out | Yuli Novak

    May 14, 20262 Views
    Our Picks

    Chinese carmaker BYD’s offices in Netherlands raided over JLR ‘copycat car’ claim | Jaguar Land Rover

    Talk of Hegseth Impeachment Grows After Democratic Midterm Sweep

    The Guardian view on a tale of two activists: Joshua Wong and Au Kam San should not be behind bars | Editorial

    Recent Posts
    • Chinese carmaker BYD’s offices in Netherlands raided over JLR ‘copycat car’ claim | Jaguar Land Rover
    • Talk of Hegseth Impeachment Grows After Democratic Midterm Sweep
    • The Guardian view on a tale of two activists: Joshua Wong and Au Kam San should not be behind bars | Editorial
    • The Election Brought Lots of Change. Test Your Knowledge.
    • ‘AI clog’: UK public bodies battle onslaught of chatbot-generated complaints | AI (artificial intelligence)
    © 2026 naijaglobalnews. Designed by Pro.
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.