English water companies have spent £16.6m fighting legal action against regulators and campaigners over environmental breaches such as illegal sewage spills.
Correspondence from the companies to the Commons environment, food and rural affairs (Efra) committee published on Tuesday reveals that millions of pounds of bill payers’ money has been spent over the past five years on expensive external lawyers enlisted to reduce liabilities for regulatory breaches.
Helena Dollimore, the Labour MP for Hastingsand Rye and a member of the committee said: “As our water pipes have been left to crumble into disrepair with vital maintenance delayed, the water companies have wasted millions on expensive legal firms tasked with downplaying the extent of the sewage scandal.
“My constituents will be outraged by what our committee has uncovered. That money should be spent fixing our broken water infrastructure not trying to deny the scale of the problem.”
Top of the list is Thames Water, which incurred £7,528,266.40 in such legal fees over the past five years – £5,002,664.26 on enforcement of regulatory breaches by Ofwat, £2,451,177.47 contesting Environment Agency investigations and £74,424.67 contesting fines from the Drinking Water Inspectorate.
The debt-ridden company is currently pleading with the government to be let off fines and costs to prevent it falling into special administration. It chief executive, Chris Weston, recently told the Efra committee that overall regulatory liabilities could reach £1bn over the current price review period.
Ofwat imposed a record £104m fine on Thames Water in May over environmental breaches involving sewage spills, after it failed to operate and manage its treatment works and wastewater networks effectively. A further £18.2m fine was levied for breaking dividend rules, the first penalty of its kind in the water industry. Ofwat said the company had paid out cash to investors despite having fallen short in its services to customers and its environmental record.
Water companies have also spent money contesting claims from local people and campaigners. South West Water, for example, spent £17,380 spent challenging five loss-of-amenity claims initiated by customers over the five-year period.
Southern Water spent £2.6m on external legal fees relating to seven regulatory actions. In all of them, the company said it had pleaded guilty as “early as possible”. “In accordance with our obligations under the sentencing guidelines [we] have engaged external legal counsel to act on our behalf to provide the courts with information on culpability, harm, aggravating factors, mitigation and other relevant matters,” it said.
It was announced in March Yorkshire Water would pay a £40m fine after an Ofwat investigation found the company had discharged wastewater for an average of seven hours a day in 2023, with almost half of the sewage spills in breach of regulations that only allow dumping in exceptional circumstances such as extreme weather events.
skip past newsletter promotion
The planet’s most important stories. Get all the week’s environment news – the good, the bad and the essential
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
The documents disclose that the company spent £1.7m on solicitors’ fees during this investigation. company.
The water companies have been contacted for comment.
