Superimposed 3-D model of proposed arch
President Trump’s vision for a giant triumphal arch in Washington would drastically change the sightlines between some of the country’s most symbolic memorials.
The latest design — quadruple the size of what was originally proposed — has been met with hesitation even from a panel stacked with Trump allies, and it has drawn criticism from architects, historians and veterans. A major concern is how the design could disrupt a historically significant axis between the Lincoln Memorial and the Arlington National Cemetery.
The proposed “United States Triumphal Arch” would be built on a roundabout at one end of the Arlington Memorial Bridge, which connects the nation’s capital to the cemetery, where more than 400,000 veterans and their family members have been buried since the Civil War.
The reciprocal view between the Lincoln Memorial and the cemetery’s Arlington House — a mansion built by enslaved people that stands as a memorial to the Confederate General Robert E. Lee — was intentionally designed a century ago. The bridge connects the two memorials on either side of the Potomac River as a “symbolic link between north and south,” according to the National Park Service.
The New York Times photographed the landscape surrounding the arch’s proposed location from several perspectives and created a 3-D model to visualize the impact on the sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington House. The analysis shows that the proposed arch would not only dwarf the other memorials, but also interfere with the carefully crafted view.
When viewed from the ground outside the Lincoln Memorial, the arch’s two columns would create a frame around Arlington House.
The architect designing the project, Nicolas Leo Charbonneau, told the federal Commission of Fine Arts this month that the arch serves as an “enduring, grand and noble gateway into the city and frames views of Arlington House and the Lincoln Memorial in either direction.”
But when viewed from Arlington House, which sits on a hill atop the cemetery, the arch would obscure much of the Lincoln Memorial.
Though it granted preliminary approval for the plan, the federal fine arts panel has requested revisions. In a letter last week, the panel, which holds an advisory role, backed the proposed location for the arch but endorsed only a smaller version.
It asked the administration to remove the gilded statues at the top of the arch and to create more openings within its columns, expressing concern about the monumental views it could otherwise obstruct.
The Times analysis shows that more of the Lincoln Memorial could be visible from other sites along the historic axis.
When viewed from near the entrance of Arlington National Cemetery, the edges of the Lincoln Memorial would be obscured, but a larger section of the monument would be visible through the arch’s opening.
The Trump administration is eager to break ground: The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, has said that beginning construction on the arch would be a “fitting way” to commemorate America’s 250th anniversary this July. But the administration has yet to release details on how much it would cost or who would pay for it, another concern for those who oppose the plan.
Reciprocal views between landmarks were a “guiding principle” for planners of Washington’s monumental core, and they have always been “mindful” of the relationship between the two memorials on either side of the Arlington Memorial Bridge, said Priya Jain, who leads preservation advocacy efforts for the Society of Architectural Historians.
Anything that “interrupts” that relationship “should be very carefully considered,” she said.
The potential disruption of the view between the two memorials is the subject of a federal lawsuit brought by a group of Vietnam War veterans and an architectural historian. The arch “will dominate the views of and the relationship between the surrounding memorials,” the lawsuit argues.
The lawsuit also asserts that the arch would first require congressional approval under various statutes, including the Commemorative Works Act of 1986. In response, the Trump administration has argued that Congress had already granted permission to build “two tall columns surmounted by statues” in the area in the 1920s and allowed for those designs to be modified.
Construction of the arch will still require approval from the National Capital Planning Commission, another oversight board that Trump has filled with his allies. The history of other major monuments in Washington is defined by a great deal of congressional oversight and extensive debate between architects and such planning commissions, Ms. Jain said. “These were not decisions that were taken lightly.”
See a panoramic view in front of the proposed 250-foot arch.
Tap and drag to explore on your own.
