March 9, 2026
2 min read
Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm
RFK, Jr.’s overhauled autism advisory board cancels first public meeting
The cancellation of a meeting of the committee that guides federal autism research funding follows an announcement that an independent group of autism scientists would meet the same day
Andrew Harnik/Staff/Getty Images
The government’s advisory board on autism research has cancelled a public meeting scheduled for March 19. This would have been the first public meeting of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC), a group that guides federally funded autism research, since health secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., entirely overhauled the group’s membership in January. He appointed 21 new members, some of whom are vaccine skeptics.
The news of the cancellation broke on March 7, the same week that a group of autism experts formed an independent group to counter misinformation. This outside group, which calls itself the Independent Autism Coordinating Committee (I-ACC), scheduled a meeting on the same day as the federal IACC meeting. The rival group includes several former members of the federal advisory board.
The Department of Health and Human Services confirmed the cancellation in an e-mail to Scientific American. In a post shared on X (formerly Twitter) on Monday morning, the agency wrote: “The Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee meeting originally scheduled for March 19 has been postponed. We recognize the importance of the committee’s work and the strong interest from the autism community in this meeting. We are actively working to reschedule and will share additional information as it becomes available.”
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The IACC historically meets four times a year to discuss directions for autism research and make recommendations to leaders of federal agencies that study autism or provide services to autistic people. It has not met since President Trump took office for his second term.
The formation of a competing committee of autism scientists is part of a broader push to fill in the gaps in public health left by agencies under the Trump administration. This includes states forming regional health alliances and medical organizations issuing vaccine schedule recommendations.
Helen Tager-Flusberg, an autism researcher who served on the federal advisory committee from 2019 to 2025, is now a member of the 12-person independent group. In a statement sent to Scientific American, she said that the new group “will become a vital tool to forcefully respond to the damage initiated by the Secretary of HHS to the future of autism science by appointing a committee that is filled with people who reject decades of evidence on the causes of autism.”
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
