January 21, 2026
4 min read
Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm
Sonic booms can protect Earth from dangerous space junk
Scientists are using technology developed to study earthquakes to address an out-of-this-world risk
By mapping areas where seismometers in southern California detected sonic booms, researchers at Johns Hopkins University and Imperial College London were able to track the path of the Shenzhou-15 orbital module after it reentered the Earth’s atmosphere on April 2, 2024.
Sophia Economon, Johns Hopkins University
As global numbers of space launches relentlessly skyrocket, so, too, does the amount of dangerous space debris that reenters the atmosphere and falls back to Earth, raising the odds that, sooner or later, disaster will strike. Most space debris is so small that it burns entirely as it falls. Larger objects from NASA and most other space agencies typically follow a “controlled” reentry: nudged down by rocket motors, they plunge toward remote and desolate regions of the planet. But the ongoing uptick in space activity has led to growing numbers of riskier uncontrolled reentries.
Now scientists have found a new way to monitor such potentially hazardous objects tumbling through Earth’s atmosphere. Sonic booms picked up by preexisting networks of seismometers, it turns out, can reconstruct descent paths and locate crash sites for derelict spacecraft and large pieces of debris. Led by Benjamin Fernando, a postdoctoral fellow at Johns Hopkins University, in collaboration with Constantinos Charalambous, a research fellow at Imperial College London, a study detailing the result was published today in Science.
“This is a very useful extra tool in our toolbox,” says Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian and a spaceflight tracker, who was not part of the study. Optical telescopes and radar systems routinely monitor space junk, he notes, but both struggle to track debris as it disintegrates during reentry—and optical systems really only work at night. “Sonic booms should work whether it’s day or night,” McDowell says. “And since these seismic networks are already operational, you could get this almost ‘for free,’ once you know how to do the analysis.”
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The study’s origins trace back to April 2, 2024, when a 1.5-metric-ton module that had been left in orbit in 2022 by China’s crewed Shenzhou-15 mission underwent an uncontrolled atmospheric reentry at supersonic speed. Passing ominously over major population centers on six continents, the decaying orbit of the large, heavy module had caused international concern—and had even spurred U.S. Space Command to forecast that the reentry debris would ultimately fall in the North Atlantic. This prediction proved to be off by thousands of kilometers. Although the module mostly burned up as it streaked through the skies over southern California and no confirmed debris has been found, any that did reach Earth probably landed in the Pacific Ocean or the western U.S.
Fernando, who also studies extraterrestrial quakes on Mars and other worlds, decided to take a closer look after realizing that the shock waves from the supersonic Shenzhou-15 debris should have manifested as sonic booms in the dense networks of seismometers that lace earthquake-prone southern California. When he and Charalambous manually sifted through the networks’ publicly available, open-source data, they found the reentry registered on more than 120 monitoring stations. Together, the duo analyzed the arrival times for the strongest shock waves at each location.
“From that, we were able to work out [the module’s] speed, descent, angle and trajectory—and also probe how it broke apart in the atmosphere,” Fernando says, adding that the technique, if scaled up and automated, could work “in near real time,” within minutes or even seconds of a reentry event’s first sonic booms, just as the need for accurate tracking peaks. “Once an object is burning and breaking up within the atmosphere, it actually becomes quite difficult to track,” he says, “which also makes it harder to understand its impacts on the atmosphere, the risk it poses to aviation and the threat it represents wherever it may hit the ground.”
None of these matters are trivial. Many atmospheric scientists are increasingly alarmed by spiking levels of vaporized aerospace-derived materials in the upper atmosphere, some of which could harm Earth’s protective ozone layer. Air travelers have already encountered near misses, such as when a test flight of SpaceX’s Starship vehicle last year scattered debris across a swath of the Caribbean and forced aircraft to take evasive action. The list of sizable debris that has fallen to Earth too close for comfort to inhabited areas is worrisomely long. And outside of sheer impact threats, some of this debris includes materials, such as radioactive isotopes for nuclear reactors or volatile, toxic rocket fuel, that are very environmentally hazardous.
Sonic booms are unlikely to offer enough lead time for, say, a passenger jet to escape a collision course with a plummeting piece of space junk. But the method could prove essential for pinpointing hazardous debris on the ground to aid recovery and remediation efforts. It could also be a game changer for improving models of how breakups happen on high. “That’s really important,” McDowell says, “both for designing spacecraft to break up more effectively upon reentry and for understanding how much a spacecraft ablates into the atmosphere to potentially change atmospheric chemistry.”
The bigger question is whether significant investments will be made to change the long-standing status quo. “For 60 years, we’ve been letting things reenter uncontrolled, knowing that, for the larger ones, some fraction will reach the surface,” McDowell says. “We’ve just been hoping that it doesn’t hit anyone on the head or cause other harm. But eventually we’re going to run out of luck.”
For the technique, Fernando envisions two paths forward, both of which would treat the challenge of sonic boom tracking as a “big data” problem. The first would leverage current seismic networks, especially on the U.S. West Coast, where such networks are already entrenched and where orbital dynamics dictate that more reentry events occur. The second would focus on new, custom-built networks in other parts of the world confronting escalating space debris. “Take the ecologically sensitive Great Barrier Reef off Australia’s northeastern coast, for instance,” Fernando says. “A lot of Chinese rockets drop around there from [a launch site on the Chinese island of] Hainan. Setting up a seismic network there would be extremely cheap compared to alternatives like building a network of radar stations.”
Experts hope the public and policymakers take notice of the growing problem of space debris. “It’s only going to get worse,” Fernando says. “I fear space debris isn’t going to get the attention it deserves until something truly catastrophic occurs—and I’d guess the probability of that happening is 100 percent.”
