Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Is it true that … beards are unhygienic? | Hygiene

    The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s

    ‘Truly horrific’: the stories of five people affected by the NHS maternity scandal | NHS

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    Naija Global News |
    Monday, June 22
    • Business
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Education
    • Social Issues
    • Technology
    • More
      • Crime & Justice
      • Environment
      • Entertainment
    Naija Global News |
    You are at:Home»Science»Scientists just calculated how many microplastics are in our atmosphere. The number is absolutely shocking
    Science

    Scientists just calculated how many microplastics are in our atmosphere. The number is absolutely shocking

    onlyplanz_80y6mtBy onlyplanz_80y6mtJanuary 22, 2026004 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Scientists just calculated how many microplastics are in our atmosphere. The number is absolutely shocking

    Microplastics travel by air and sea, turning up even in remote areas.

    Ben Stansall/Getty Images

    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    January 22, 2026

    2 min read

    Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

    Scientists just calculated how many microplastics are in our atmosphere. The number is absolutely shocking

    A new estimate suggests land sources eject 600 quadrillion pieces of microplastic into the atmosphere every year

    By K. R. Callaway edited by Claire Cameron

    Microplastics travel by air and sea, turning up even in remote areas.

    Ben Stansall/Getty Images

    Microplastics are pervasive, found everywhere on Earth, from the Sahara Desert to patches of Arctic sea ice. Yet despite these plastic particles’ ubiquity, scientists have struggled to determine exactly how many of them are in our atmosphere.

    Now a new estimate published in Nature suggests that land sources release about 600 quadrillion (600,000,000,000,000,000) microplastic particles into the atmosphere every year, about 20 times more than the number of particles contributed by oceans (about 26 quadrillion).

    The median concentration of microplastics is 0.08 particle per cubic meter (m3) over land and 0.003 particle per m3 over sea, the study found.

    On supporting science journalism

    If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

    These estimates are between 100 and 10,000 times lower than previous accountings of atmospheric microplastics—a discrepancy that the researchers behind the new study say underscores the need for better global measures of these pollutants.

    “We knew that uncertainties of existing emission estimates were very large,” says Andreas Stohl, senior author of the study and an atmospheric scientist at the University of Vienna. “They are even still large after our study, but we could at least narrow down the uncertainty range, especially when it comes to the importance of land-based versus ocean-based emissions.”

    A microplastic is any plastic particle sized between one micron and five millimeters. Easily swept up by wind and carried long distances by water, these tiny motes are also exceedingly difficult to detect and almost impossible to remove from the environment.

    Past estimates have focused on accounting for microplastics generated by human activity or directly measuring their concentration in the air in any given area. But these measures are highly variable: along the southeastern coast of China, for example, atmospheric microplastic estimates have ranged from 0.004 to 190 particles per m3. To try and get at a more global estimate, Stohl and his team compiled 2,782 measurements collected at 283 locations worldwide.

    The researchers hope the findings will act as a baseline for future studies of global microplastic levels, including new measures that will be able to account for even smaller particles than they did.

    It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

    If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

    I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

    If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

    In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

    There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

    Absolutely Atmosphere calculated Microplastics Number Scientists shocking
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleK-pop supergroup BTS set to trigger US economic boom with tour: ‘Every stop is going to see a boost’ | Business
    Next Article I went back to school for a day – and discovered some very unsettling facts about learning | Adrian Chiles
    onlyplanz_80y6mt
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Not so empty nesters: record-high number of US adults under 35 live at home, new data says | Housing

    June 18, 2026

    Scientists are working on headphones that block annoying noises and allow the ones you love? I can’t wait! | Emma Beddington

    June 15, 2026

    Blood test can find thousands of genetic conditions in pregnancy, say scientists | Pregnancy

    June 13, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The science influencers going viral on TikTok to fight misinformation

    February 17, 20262 Views

    Watch Lady Gaga’s Perform ‘Vanish Into You’ on ‘Colbert’

    September 9, 20251 Views

    Advertisers flock to Fox seeking an ‘audience of one’ — Donald Trump

    July 13, 20251 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    At Chile’s Vera Rubin Observatory, Earth’s Largest Camera Surveys the Sky

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    SpaceX Starship Explodes Before Test Fire

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    How the L.A. Port got hit by Trump’s Tariffs

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    The science influencers going viral on TikTok to fight misinformation

    February 17, 20262 Views

    Watch Lady Gaga’s Perform ‘Vanish Into You’ on ‘Colbert’

    September 9, 20251 Views

    Advertisers flock to Fox seeking an ‘audience of one’ — Donald Trump

    July 13, 20251 Views
    Our Picks

    Is it true that … beards are unhygienic? | Hygiene

    The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s

    ‘Truly horrific’: the stories of five people affected by the NHS maternity scandal | NHS

    Recent Posts
    • Is it true that … beards are unhygienic? | Hygiene
    • The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s
    • ‘Truly horrific’: the stories of five people affected by the NHS maternity scandal | NHS
    • I disagree with Andy Burnham’s politics. But as former health secretaries, we both know the NHS needs to be fixed | Jeremy Hunt
    • Jeremy Clarkson says he’s in remission from prostate cancer: ‘The doctors caught it early’ | Jeremy Clarkson
    © 2026 naijaglobalnews. Designed by Pro.
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.