January 5, 2026
2 min read
Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm
Stunningly Hot Galaxy Cluster Puts New Spin on How These Cosmic Behemoths Evolved
Scientists detected gas at least five times hotter than previous theories had predicted inside a galaxy cluster from the early universe
A scorchingly hot galaxy cluster in the early universe has left scientists baffled. The cluster was already blistering hot when the universe was just 1.4 billion years old—it is at least five times hotter than past theories had suggested could exist at that moment in our cosmos. The findings were detailed in a new study published on Monday in Nature.
“We didn’t expect to see such a hot cluster atmosphere so early in cosmic history,” said Dazhi Zhou, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of British Columbia and lead author of the paper, in a statement.
Zhou and his colleagues found that the gas that is threaded between the 30 or so active galaxies in this cluster, known as SPT2349-56, is much hotter and more plentiful than it should be. The gas is far hotter than the sun, Zhou told New Scientist, and far hotter than what many astronomers find in present-day clusters.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, or ALMA, Zhou and his team were able to peer back to the early universe. Their findings suggest that there were more objects like SPT2349-56 producing vast amounts of energy during a moment in the universe’s early history in which scientists had thought such objects simply didn’t do so.
The team doesn’t know why the gas is so hot, but future research to find out could help astronomers better understand how the universe as we know it evolved. “Understanding galaxy clusters is the key to understanding the biggest galaxies in the universe,” which mostly reside in clusters, said Scott Chapman, a professor at Dalhousie University and a co-author on the new study, in the same statement.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
