Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    The Guardian view on post-16 qualifications: the case for V-levels replacing BTecs is unproven | Editorial

    Decriminalising abortion: how could the House of Lords amend the legislation? | Abortion

    Impact of fewer jury trials on minorities | Trial by jury

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    Naija Global News |
    Sunday, March 15
    • Business
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Education
    • Social Issues
    • Technology
    • More
      • Crime & Justice
      • Environment
      • Entertainment
    Naija Global News |
    You are at:Home»Environment»Trump Administration Targets Offshore Wind Farms, Citing National Security Concerns
    Environment

    Trump Administration Targets Offshore Wind Farms, Citing National Security Concerns

    onlyplanz_80y6mtBy onlyplanz_80y6mtDecember 22, 2025004 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Trump Administration Targets Offshore Wind Farms, Citing National Security Concerns

    Pilot project turbines for the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Program, slated to be completed in 2026.

    Kendall Warner/The Virginian-Pilot/Tribune News Service/Getty Images

    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    December 22, 2025

    2 min read

    Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

    Trump Administration Targets Offshore Wind Farms, Citing National Security Concerns

    The U.S. Department of the Interior announced it would “pause” leases for five large offshore wind farms, imperiling the fast-growing clean energy industry

    By Dan Vergano edited by Claire Cameron

    Pilot project turbines for the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Program, slated to be completed in 2026.

    Kendall Warner/The Virginian-Pilot/Tribune News Service/Getty Images

    The Trump administration on Monday announced it was “pausing—effective immediately” leases for five large offshore wind farms being built off the East Coast. In the announcement, Department of the Interior secretary Doug Burgum cited “emerging national security risks” for the decision, but the agency provided no evidence as to what risks had been found.

    The five projects affected by the pause are offshore of New York State, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Virginia. Around 5.8 gigawatts of offshore wind was expected to come online in the U.S. between 2025 to 2029—enough to power millions of homes across the Eastern Seaboard. Some $10 billion has been invested in the U.S. wind industry since 2021. The Trump administration decision imperils that both that investment and future energy capacity.

    A statement announcing the decision on Monday indicated that wind turbines caused radar “clutter,” referencing a 2024 Energy Department report that looked into wind turbines’ effect on radar systems.

    On supporting science journalism

    If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

    That report warned that clutter from wind turbines in the line of sight of defense and civilian radar systems can cause interference and lead to false alarms. One strategy to mitigate this problem, the report noted, is to lower radar detection thresholds—which reduces the clutter but could result in missing “actual targets.” Another option the report proposed is to ensure wind farms aren’t built in a radar’s line of sight.

    “We should not be kneecapping America’s largest source of renewable power, especially when we need more cheap, homegrown electricity,” said Ted Kelly of U.S. Clean Energy at the Environmental Defense Fund, in a statement. “Instead, this administration has baselessly and unlawfully attacked wind energy,” he added.

    One of the affected projects, the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project, was sited “in close coordination with the military,” according to a spokesperson for Dominion Energy, which operates the wind farm, in comments to the New York Times. Indeed, wind farm operators, scientists and the military have collaborated on minimizing radar effects of wind farms for decades. Burgum on Monday told Fox Business that the decision to pause the projects came because the Department of Defense “has come back conclusively that … these large offshore wind programs create radar interference.”

    The Department of the Interior and the Department of Defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Editor’s Note: This story is in development and may be updated.

    It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

    If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

    I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

    If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

    In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

    There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

    administration citing concerns farms national offshore security Targets Trump Wind
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleUse of traditional medicine in mainstream healthcare needs to be evidence-based | Alternative medicine
    Next Article Did you solve it? Are you ready for twenty twenty-six…seven? | Mathematics
    onlyplanz_80y6mt
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Mining made this US tribal area a toxic wasteland. This Indigenous nation brought it back to life | Native Americans

    March 15, 2026

    Scientists revive activity in frozen mouse brains for the first time

    March 15, 2026

    I love vultures, mosquitoes and, yes, even wasps. This is why you should too | Jo Wimpenny

    March 15, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Watch Lady Gaga’s Perform ‘Vanish Into You’ on ‘Colbert’

    September 9, 20251 Views

    Advertisers flock to Fox seeking an ‘audience of one’ — Donald Trump

    July 13, 20251 Views

    A Setback for Maine’s Free Community College Program

    June 19, 20251 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    At Chile’s Vera Rubin Observatory, Earth’s Largest Camera Surveys the Sky

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    SpaceX Starship Explodes Before Test Fire

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    How the L.A. Port got hit by Trump’s Tariffs

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    Watch Lady Gaga’s Perform ‘Vanish Into You’ on ‘Colbert’

    September 9, 20251 Views

    Advertisers flock to Fox seeking an ‘audience of one’ — Donald Trump

    July 13, 20251 Views

    A Setback for Maine’s Free Community College Program

    June 19, 20251 Views
    Our Picks

    The Guardian view on post-16 qualifications: the case for V-levels replacing BTecs is unproven | Editorial

    Decriminalising abortion: how could the House of Lords amend the legislation? | Abortion

    Impact of fewer jury trials on minorities | Trial by jury

    Recent Posts
    • The Guardian view on post-16 qualifications: the case for V-levels replacing BTecs is unproven | Editorial
    • Decriminalising abortion: how could the House of Lords amend the legislation? | Abortion
    • Impact of fewer jury trials on minorities | Trial by jury
    • The Guardian view on weight-loss jabs and addiction: there is too much moralising about these remarkable medicines | Editorial
    • Beyond the strait: why attacks on Kargh Island could keep oil prices high | Oil
    © 2026 naijaglobalnews. Designed by Pro.
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.