Angela Rayner backs Tory calls for intelligence and security committee to decide what Mandelson files released
Angela Rayner, the former deputy PM, has urged the government to agree to the Tory proposal (see 1.15pm) for the intelligence and security committee to decide what Mandelson files are released, and what are held back.
In intervention while Thomas-Symonds was speaking, she said that she had table a humble address on PPE in 2022.
She said:
Given the public disgust and the sickening behaviour of Peter Mandelson and the importance of transparency … should we not have the ISC not have the same role now [as in relation to a previous humble address] in keeping public confidence in the process?
Angela Rayner speaking in the debate Photograph: HoCShare
Key events
Show key events only
Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
Thomas-Symonds says government will consider call for ISC to take over document vetting role
In his response to Angela Rayner, Thomas-Symonds said the cabinet secretary, a man of “unimpeachable integrity”, would decide what material should be released assuming the motion is passed with the government’s amendment. And he says Cabinet Office lawyers would be involved.
But he added:
I am hearing what the house is saying and I will take that point away.
Share
Angela Rayner backs Tory calls for intelligence and security committee to decide what Mandelson files released
Angela Rayner, the former deputy PM, has urged the government to agree to the Tory proposal (see 1.15pm) for the intelligence and security committee to decide what Mandelson files are released, and what are held back.
In intervention while Thomas-Symonds was speaking, she said that she had table a humble address on PPE in 2022.
She said:
Given the public disgust and the sickening behaviour of Peter Mandelson and the importance of transparency … should we not have the ISC not have the same role now [as in relation to a previous humble address] in keeping public confidence in the process?
Angela Rayner speaking in the debate Photograph: HoCShare
Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds responds to Tories in Mandelson debate
Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Cabinet Office minister, is replying to Burghart on behalf of the government.
He started by saying the “depth and extent” of Peter Mandelson’s ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein’s first conviction was not known when Mandelson was appointed ambassador
Share
Burghart ended his speech by asking about a secret visit that Keir Starmer made to the Palantir HQ in Washington when he visited the city while Mandelson was ambassador. He said Palantir was a client of Global Counsel, the firm set up by Mandelson. He says Palantir subsequently won a big government contract. He says that should be investigated.
Share
Shadow minister Alex Burghart suggests intelligence and security committee should get to decide what Mandelson material released
Burghart said that, if the government has concerns about releasing some of the material in the Mandelson files, it should agree to letting the intelligence and security committee deciding what is made public.
Share
Tories says claims Epstein was Russian asset ‘must be investigated’
Burghart referred to claims that Jeffrey Epstein may have been a Russian asset. He said these were issues that must now now be investigated and investigated very seriously”.
Share
Burghart said a report in the New Statesman today says a due diligence report on Peter Mandelson before he was appointed ambassador highlighted various conflicts of interest.
He is referring to this story by Ailbhe Rea. She says:
The report on Mandelson warned of potential conflicts of interest surrounding Global Counsel, the lobbying company Mandelson co-founded, in which he had a 28 per cent stake (worth about £8.5m). It highlighted the company’s clients, in particular Russian and Chinese links, according to someone familiar with the report’s contents …
And then there was a section on Epstein. Sources familiar with the report confirm that it clearly stated that Mandelson’s relationship with the paedophile continued after his conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution. It contained links to photographs of Mandelson with the paedophile, and drew particular attention to evidence that Mandelson had stayed at Epstein’s apartment while he was in prison. It was sent directly to the prime minister.
The cabinet secretary, Chris Wormald, was asked about the report in November and told MPs that it contained “a summary of reputational risks” associated with appointing Mandelson, including his “prior relationship with Jeffrey Epstein”.
Yet “Morgan [McSweeney, the PM’s chief of staff] was relaxed” when he saw the report, according to one person who observed him at the time, because the chief of staff said that Labour had already broached a conversation with Mandelson about these issues years before. (A No 10 source disputes this characterisation, emphasising that the prime minister and McSweeney followed up on details raised by the report.)
Share
MPs debate Tory motion calling for release of files relating to Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador
MPs are now debating the Tory motion on Peter Mandelson.
Alex Burghart, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, started by saying that Keir Starmer knew full well about Peter Mandelson’s ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after Epstein’s first child sex conviction. He says, not only had the FT published it; journalists had even told Starmer about it, he says.
Share
I have beefed up some of the earlier posts with direct quotes from the Starmer/Badenoch exchanges. You may need to refresh the page to get the updates to appear.
Share
PMQs – snap verdict
That felt like a preview of the debate that is just starting now. And it may even turn out to be spikier, which is being opened by Alex Burghart, the shadow Cabinet Office minister. Keir Starmer is on the defensive, he knows it, and he came armed with at least two nuggets of news intended to blunt the Tory attack: an announcement about Peter Mandelson adding the privy counsel to the list of organisations that has know kicked him out, and a reference to the police warning Downing Street about the risk of prejudicial material being disclosed. The latter was a not-so-subtle hint to MPs about the danger of passing the Tory motion about the release of Mandelson files without the Labour amendment exempting some documents.
But none of this was enough to blunt the force of Badenoch’s main point – which was that appointing Mandelson as an ambassador when he knew that Mandelson had remained friends with Jeffrey Epstein after his first child sex conviction was a colossal mistake.
And of course Starmer knew. It had been in the Financial Times.
FT Mandelson story from 2023 Photograph: FT
Given that Starmer himself now realises what a terrible error appointing Mandelson was, it is not surprising that Badenoch’s arguments about this carried the day.
Share
David Davis, the former Tory cabinet minster, says today’s debate on Peter Mandelson will not covere his relationship with Oleg Deripaska. He says this was just as bad as the relationship with Jeffrey Epstein because Deripaska is also an alleged paedophile, murderer, gangster, specialist in bribery and corruption, and Putin favourite. He says that, as EU trade commissioner, Mandelson took decisions that favoured Deripaska’s companies.
Lindsay Hoyle, the speaker, says Davis is an experienced MP and will be able to find other ways of raising this.
Share
Suella Braverman, the former Tory home secretary who defected to Reform UK, gets the final question. She asks about a rape gang survivor. Her first rapist was convicted. But she was then abused by a police officer who remains on active service, she says. She asks if the PM will meet the survivor to hear her story.
Starmer says he is “deeply concerned” about what Braverman has said, and he will arrange a meeting.
Share
Christine Jardine (Lib Dem) asks if helpline will be set up to support women triggered by the Jeffrey Epstein stories.
Starmer says the govenment is continuing its work on tackling violence against women and girls.
Share
Layla Moran (Lib Dem) says her residents in Oxford West and Abingdon are sick of being let down by Thames Water. Will he admit that Thames Water should be “put out of its misery” and turned into a company for public benefit.
Starmer says if necessary the government will go further in taking control over the company.
Share
Neil Hudson (Con) asks about migrants being housed in the Bell hotel in his Epping constituency.
Starmer says the government is committed to ending the use of all asylum hotels.
Share
