Netflix co-chief executive Ted Sarandos faced tough questioning over whether the streamer is “overwhelmingly woke” or killing competition on Tuesday afternoon during a congressional hearing focused on its pending acquisition of the film and streaming assets of Warner Bros Discovery.
The hearing was conducted by the Senate subcommittee on antitrust, competition policy, and consumer rights. Bruce Campbell, chief revenue and strategy officer for Warner Bros Discovery, also testified in the packed Senate hearing room.
Both Sarandos and Campbell addressed concerns about how the merger would affect entertainment industry jobs, whether it would raise consumer prices for streaming services, whether it would result in less content for users and whether it would hurt the movie theater business.
“We’re going to operate the Warner Bros studio largely as it is today,” Sarandos said in response to a question from Democratic senator Adam Schiff about whether the merger would result in layoffs.
Josh Hawley, a Republican senator, specifically questioned Sarandos about the content of Netlix programming, using data that Sarandos said was “inaccurate”. Hawley said he and his wife had to review the Netflix content their children want to watch because “I don’t have confidence in what’s on your platform”.
“Why is it that so much of Netflix content for children promotes a transgender ideology?” Hawley asked. “An enormous amount of your children’s programming has this ideology in it.”
Sarandos said that “Netflix programming has no agenda of any kind”, adding: “We feature a wide variety of stories and programs to meet a wide variety of tastes.”
“My concern is that you don’t share my values or that of many American parents,” Hawley said. “I think we ought to be concerned about what content you’re promoting.”
Eric Schmitt, a Republican senator from Missouri, pressed Sarandos on donations made by Netflix employees to Democrats and accused him and his company of promoting “DEI and wokeness”. “The overwhelming majority of your stuff is overwhelmingly woke,” he added.
“We have no political agenda,” Sarandos responded. “We have a great deal of programming on Netflix, left, right and center.”
When asked by a Democratic senator about concerns that past media mergers have resulted in job losses, Sarandos acknowledged that “most media mergers have faired poorly”, but said: “This media merger will be different than any of the others because we actually need these people.”
The chair of the subcommittee, Republican senator Mike Lee, began the hearing by saying that the merger raises competition concerns because Netflix would no longer be competing with a streaming service it would acquire, HBO Max.
“The merged firm would have both the incentive and the ability to put rivals at a disadvantage,” Lee said in his opening remarks, saying the deal could “further entrench Netflix’s dominance”.
In his opening remarks, Sarandos talked about the value of the merger and the need to compete in an extremely crowded marketplace for content.
“With WBD, we’re going to create more economic growth and more value for consumers,” Sarandos said. “We will give consumers more content for less … We’re buying a company that has assets we do not, and we will keep investing in Warner Bros.”
The deal was originally announced in early December, and Netflix upgraded its purchase price in mid-January to make the transaction – valued at $82.7bn – all cash.
Paramount Skydance has also made several unsuccessful offers for the entirety of Warner Bros Discovery, including its television assets.
Cory Booker, the top Democrat on the Senate subcommittee, said he had invited Paramount Skydance chief executive David Ellison to appear at the hearing but he declined. “The absence of having Paramount Skydance here is frustrating,” he said, although he thanked Ellison for meeting with him and other senators to discuss his company’s bid.
Booker questioned Sarandos about his meetings with Donald Trump, and asked whether he thought the president’s stated intention to be “involved” in the merger process was appropriate.
Sarandos said he had met with Trump “a few times”. While he said the meetings were mostly about the state of the entertainment industry, rather than to discuss the merger, “of course he asked how the deal is going”, Sarandos added.
“I think the president, from my experience, has been nothing but interested in protecting and creating American jobs,” Sarandos said.
Anti-monopoly groups and veterans of the anti-trust space have said that Netflix’s acquisition of WBD presents competition concerns that will surely be looked at closely by both domestic and international regulators.
While the anti-trust division of the justice department has the most significant role to play in approving the deal, along with the Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general could also file lawsuits to block the deal.
Booker expressed doubt that the review process would be handled fairly by the Trump administration.
“I think it’s really important that we gather a lot of information,” Booker said at the end of the hearing. “I do not trust this administration in their evaluations.”
Sarandos, however, expressed confidence that the review “will be run on the merits” of the Department of Justice.
