December 12, 2025
2 min read
Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm
In a First, Photos Show Moths Sipping a Moose’s Tears
Moths sometimes drink the tears of other animals, but the behavior has mostly been observed in the tropics. New photographs show only the second observation outside of that area
Moths hover around the face of a moose, drinking its tears, as seen in trail camera images from the Green Mountain National Forest in Vermont.
Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department
When animals cry, moths start licking their chops.
The less glamorous relatives of butterflies have been known to use their long proboscis to sip the tears of everything from birds to reptiles to even domestic animals. But the behavior, known as lachryphagy, has been mostly observed in the tropics.
Now, for the first time, researchers have documented moths drinking the tears of a moose—just the second time the behavior has been documented outside of the tropics. (The other was observed with a horse in Arkansas.)
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Laurence Clarfeld, a researcher in the Vermont Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at the University of Vermont, came across the sighting by chance while scrolling through trail camera images from the Green Mountain National Forest in Vermont for an unrelated project. “It almost looked like the moose had two [additional] eyes,” he says. “At first, I wasn’t sure what it was.”
Only after skimming through the sequence of images did he realize he was looking at moths drinking the tears of a bull moose. “I’d looked at a lot of trail camera images. I’d never seen anything like that before,” he says. The findings were published recently in Ecosphere. A colleague recently filmed another instance of moths drinking a moose’s tears in Vermont.
Moths—and some other insects, such as bees—are thought to feed on other animals’ tears to get minerals and other nutrients.
The rarity of documentation outside of the tropics might simply be because “not a lot of scientists are looking in these places,” says entomologist Akito Kawahara, director of the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity at the Florida Museum of Natural History.
But the reason might be more concerning. “The number of moth species and individual abundance of species is declining pretty significantly in many places,” Kawahara, who was not involved in the new research, says. “So it’s also possible that we just don’t see many more because there aren’t that many anymore.”
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
