MPs have moved to lodge a parliamentary motion to strip Prince Andrew of his dukedom, in a rarely permitted move in the Commons.
The government is facing mounting pressure over the prince’s residence in the 30-room Royal Lodge in Windsor, where it was revealed that he has not paid rent for more than two decades.
The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, said she believed people should “pay their way” when asked whether Andrew should be permitted to remain there after the fresh allegations made against him about his relationship with the convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Reeves said she was not across the details of his living arrangements but said they should be decided fairly. “He shouldn’t have been associated with a convicted paedophile, and I think the new revelations in this book make for very sober reading and I’m sure everybody will reflect on that and form their own judgment,” she told the BBC.
The Times reported that under the Royal Lodge’s leasehold agreement, released under freedom of information laws, Andrew paid £1m for the lease and at least £7.5m for refurbishments, but had paid only “one peppercorn (if demanded)” in rent each year since 2003 and he is entitled to live there until 2078.
The lease suggests that the crown estate would owe Prince Andrew about £558,000 if he gave up the lease.
Polling showed that four out of five Britons want Prince Andrew to be formally stripped of his dukedom. In the survey by YouGov, 63% of nearly 6,700 adults questioned were “strongly” in favour of formal removal of the dukedom and 17% “somewhat” supported the idea, while 6% were opposed to it – 4% somewhat and 2% strongly – and 14% did not know.
The pressure comes amid fresh allegations made about the prince in the posthumous memoir by the Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre, who said she had sex with Andrew on three separate occasions. She also said the prince’s team tried to “hire internet trolls” to “hassle” her online.
Her ghostwriter, Amy Wallace, said she “would view it as a victory that he was forced, by whatever means, to voluntarily give them [the titles] up” calling it a “symbolic gesture”.
She told the BBC’s Newsnight: “Virginia wanted all the men who she had been trafficked to, against her will, to be held to account, and this is just one of the men.”
There are few avenues for MPs to act to formally remove the titles. It would require an act of parliament, which the government does not intend to initiate unless requested by the palace. On Tuesday, the SNP lodged an early-day motion (EDM) to formally remove Prince Andrew’s title as Duke of York, which he has said he will no longer use.
MPs are not permitted to criticise royals during parliamentary debates, but EDMs, which usually carry very little parliamentary weight, are one of the only ways that the conduct of a royal can be raised.
Prince Andrew volunteered on Friday to give up the use of the Duke of York title, as well as the use of a variety of honours. It means his only remaining title will be that of prince, which cannot be removed as it is the result of being the son of a queen. But only parliament can remove a royal’s title, so he technically retains the name.
skip past newsletter promotion
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
The SNP’s Westminster leader, Stephen Flynn, said: “If the Westminster parties remain stubbornly slow in removing Prince Andrew’s titles, the SNP will do all we can to force them to act.
“Prince Andrew’s titles can only be removed by an act of parliament. Therefore this SNP motion is a way to pile pressure on the UK Labour government to bring forward that legislation immediately.
“The only real question is what Keir Starmer’s government is waiting for. The public knows this is the right thing to do, and even more importantly the victims at the heart of the Epstein scandal know that it’s the right thing to do. It needs to be done without any further excuses and any further delay.”
EDMs rarely have any effect apart from generating publicity for a cause, but if a significant number of cross-party names were to sign the SNP motion it would act as a method for piling pressure on the government.
By Tuesday afternoon, 18 MPs had signed the motion, none from Labour, suggesting it is unlikely to be successful.
Rachael Maskell, the Labour MP for York Central, has previously said she hoped to gain support for a bill to give the king or a parliamentary committee the power to formally remove Andrew’s titles.
“Every time this comes up, it clearly must be really traumatising for the victims and survivors, so it’s really important that this matter is dealt with once and for all,” Maskell said. “There are mechanisms which need to be put in place in order to remove a title.”
Maskell originally proposed the removal of titles bill in 2022. It is akin to similar legislation enacted in 1917 to remove the titles of peers and princes who fought against the British in the first world war.
