Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Do you need electrolytes? Will tea cool you down? Is it safe to drink beer? How to stay hydrated in a heatwave | Health

    When it comes to taxing the super rich, there’s no need to reinvent the wheel | US income inequality

    The Mission review – a surgeon saves lives in war-torn Gaza in a visceral portrait of human endurance | Movies

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    Naija Global News |
    Sunday, June 28
    • Business
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Education
    • Social Issues
    • Technology
    • More
      • Crime & Justice
      • Environment
      • Entertainment
    Naija Global News |
    You are at:Home»Social Issues»Why Does Hegseth Want More Than 800 Admirals and Generals in the Same Room?
    Social Issues

    Why Does Hegseth Want More Than 800 Admirals and Generals in the Same Room?

    onlyplanz_80y6mtBy onlyplanz_80y6mtSeptember 30, 2025009 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Why Does Hegseth Want More Than 800 Admirals and Generals in the Same Room?
    Haiyun Jiang / The New York Times / Redux
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.

    Everyone loves meetings! Who isn’t a fan of those congenial time wasters common in the government, where an entire organization piles into a poorly ventilated auditorium to hear the leadership explain things that could have just been an email?

    Okay, no one loves them, but when I worked for the Department of Defense, they weren’t that onerous a requirement, especially because I was merely an academic who could play Scrabble on my phone while some visiting admiral talked about … well, honestly, I don’t remember what they talked about. (We had a lot of those meetings.) I was not, however, a senior officer in charge of a major command, with responsibility for thousands of people and millions of dollars of weaponry. Those folks are busy, which is why the DOD has very advanced—and very expensive—teleconferencing equipment designed to obviate the need to move people around the world for a chat.

    But Secretary of Defense/War/Lethality Pete Hegseth isn’t going to use that technology. Instead, he recently decided that some 800 generals and admirals needed to come, in person, from every corner of the planet to a Marine base at Quantico, Virginia, reportedly to listen to their boss, a former TV host, lecture them on the “warrior ethos”—and, for some reason, personal grooming. The Tuesday meeting will feature not only Hegseth but also a last-minute addition: the commander in chief himself.

    Hegseth has had a lot of bad ideas, but this one is disruptive and even somewhat dangerous. All of these men and women have real jobs they should be doing. Even if Hegseth is calling this meeting to discuss serious issues of national defense—and so far, the Pentagon has given no such indications—few things are important enough to justify the security risk of putting the entire top U.S. military command, the secretary of defense, and the president all in the same room.

    It is possible, of course, that Hegseth is convening this jamboree because something genuinely terrible is afoot. Perhaps he wants all of America’s top officers in the same room when he tells them, for example, that the United States is on the brink of going to war, or that the Pentagon has been deeply compromised by spies and all of our military secrets are now in Moscow or Beijing. But if America is heading into a crisis, then Hegseth’s call for a meeting is even more irresponsible, because in a time of danger all these people should be at their posts, not in an auditorium in Virginia.

    More likely, however, Hegseth is ordering up a “loyalty check,” which is what the military calls it when the bosses schedule a surprise meeting just to make everyone show up. As the least qualified defense secretary in modern history, he must know that he has a credibility problem with many senior national-security leaders, and he is clearly angry about the leaks—often about him—dribbling out of the Pentagon on an almost-daily basis. The secretary may see this as a chance to remind America’s military who’s in charge.

    As of now, that seems to be the goal. “It’s about getting the horses into the stable and whipping them into shape,” a defense official told CNN, and suggesting that it’s an opportunity made for television because “the guys with the stars on their shoulders make for a better audience from an optics standpoint. This is a showcase for Hegseth to tell them: get on board, or potentially have your career shortened.” A senior Trump administration official told The New York Times that the meeting is to “get our fighters excited” about new plans at DOD.

    I’ve met a lot of admirals and generals in my time, and I’m not sure that a dressing-down from Pete Hegseth is going to be all that effective in either exciting them or scaring them.

    So far, no one really knows why this meeting is taking place. Hegseth and his people have been tight-lipped about it, which is odd because they apparently intend to record and broadcast it anyway. The lack of information has created fertile ground for speculation; many of Donald Trump’s critics are wondering if Trump and Hegseth are going to demand a declaration of loyalty to the president that would be similar, as retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges suggested on X, to the way German officers in the 1930s were forced to swear allegiance to Hitler. (Hegseth responded to Hodges with the sort of dude-bro laziness that characterizes the social-media behavior of top Trump-administration officials: “Cool story, General.”) I think this sort of dramatic moment is unlikely, if only because even the dimmest Pentagon functionary would have warned Hegseth that trying to put hundreds of generals and admirals on the spot could go very badly.

    What if something more substantive is in the works? Americans—and Congress—should be especially alert for anything that goes beyond a “Come on in for the big win” speech from either Hegseth or Trump. One possibility is that Hegseth is going to engage in some personnel-related shock and awe, and fire people in front of their colleagues. The officers, as The Atlantic’s editor in chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, said on Washington Week last week, “don’t know if they’re coming to a pep rally or the Red Wedding.” Hegseth is on the record saying that the military is too top-heavy with senior officers, but a public dismissal of U.S.-military leaders would be both terrible management and a gift to our enemies. (Imagine Vladimir Putin’s smirk as he tells the Russian general staff: “At least you don’t work in the Pentagon.”) It is nonetheless conceivable that some officers will arrive in Quantico as top commanders and leave as retirees.

    Another possibility is that Hegseth has decided that his schemes for reorganizing the U.S. military just aren’t being taken seriously enough. Hegseth has been getting resistance to his push to reshape several military commands, so he may be trying to announce new structures as a fait accompli and then order the officers—who would have to draw up the actual plans—to make them happen. Hegseth surely knows that they can still slow-roll his ideas into oblivion, and he may have called this meeting because he somehow thinks he has enough force of personality to stare down some 800 men and women who were officers when he was still in high school.

    Finally, the Trump administration might really be about to put the nation on a war footing, and so Hegseth wants everyone where he can talk to them and then meet one-on-one if necessary. This, too, is unlikely; such a discussion would have to include classified information, which means that the meeting could not be shown on television later.

    In the end, I suspect that Hegseth is trying to bolster his stature by flexing his bureaucratic muscles. He’s disrupting the work and daily life of hundreds of people to emphasize that he has the power to do so. Like Trump himself, Hegseth seems to feel the need to do things that others think are unwise as a way of demonstrating toughness and independence. Both men remind me of Miles, the creepy child in the Henry James novella The Turn of the Screw. When Miles misbehaves, his governess asks him why he would do such a thing. “Why, it was to show you I could!” he says. “And I can again.”

    Related:

    Here are three new stories from The Atlantic:

    Today’s News

    1. During today’s meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, President Donald Trump unveiled a Gaza peace plan that Netanyahu agreed to. The proposal calls for a halt to fighting and the release of hostages within 72 hours, but Hamas has not yet accepted the terms.
    2. At least four people were killed and eight injured after a man drove into a church, shot at parishioners, and set fire to the building in Grand Blanc Township, Michigan, yesterday. The suspect was killed at the scene, police said, and investigators are still working to determine a motive.
    3. Oregon and the city of Portland filed a lawsuit yesterday against the Trump administration to block the deployment of Oregon National Guard troops. On Saturday, Trump said that he was ordering Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to federalize 200 Guardsmen for 60 days to protect ICE and other federal personnel in the city.

    Dispatches

    Explore all of our newsletters here.

    Evening Read

    Illustration by Akshita Chandra / The Atlantic

    The Doomed Dream of an AI Matchmaker

    By Faith Hill

    Whitney Wolfe Herd has a vision for modern romance. More than a decade after founding Bumble, in 2014, she’s back at the dating-app company—and this time, she wants to get things right. For too long, she argues, people have been swiping in the dark: evaluating other multifaceted beings on the basis of a few pictures and superficial bits of description, being evaluated in turn, feeling judged and empty. Now, she says, she’s seeking a new way to inject some warmth and humanity into the process—using, as she recently told The Wall Street Journal, “the world’s smartest and most emotionally intelligent matchmaker.” She’s talking about AI.

    Read the full article.

    More From The Atlantic

    Culture Break

    Illustration by Carl Godfrey

    Explore. Zephyr Teachout recommended seven books about what corruption actually looks like.

    Read. “Diseducators,” a short story by Domenico Starnone, translated by Oonagh Stransky:

    “As students learn, they discover the most wretched things about human destiny, our planet, the universe. From ancient history to astrophysics, every new notion only reinforces the idea that being born was all a big mistake.”

    Play our daily crossword.

    Rafaela Jinich contributed to this newsletter.

    When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.

    Admirals generals Hegseth room
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleHHS Looks to Block Harvard From Federal Funds
    Next Article College football Power Rankings: How did the Top 25 look in Week 5?
    onlyplanz_80y6mt
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Hegseth Spars With Senate Democrats Over War in Iran

    May 1, 2026

    Democratic lawmaker condemns Hegseth’s call for ‘no quarter’ for US enemies | Pete Hegseth

    March 14, 2026

    Hegseth is Waging War on Colleges. His Targets Are Unclear.

    March 7, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The science influencers going viral on TikTok to fight misinformation

    February 17, 20262 Views

    Watch Lady Gaga’s Perform ‘Vanish Into You’ on ‘Colbert’

    September 9, 20251 Views

    Advertisers flock to Fox seeking an ‘audience of one’ — Donald Trump

    July 13, 20251 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    At Chile’s Vera Rubin Observatory, Earth’s Largest Camera Surveys the Sky

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    SpaceX Starship Explodes Before Test Fire

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    How the L.A. Port got hit by Trump’s Tariffs

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    The science influencers going viral on TikTok to fight misinformation

    February 17, 20262 Views

    Watch Lady Gaga’s Perform ‘Vanish Into You’ on ‘Colbert’

    September 9, 20251 Views

    Advertisers flock to Fox seeking an ‘audience of one’ — Donald Trump

    July 13, 20251 Views
    Our Picks

    Do you need electrolytes? Will tea cool you down? Is it safe to drink beer? How to stay hydrated in a heatwave | Health

    When it comes to taxing the super rich, there’s no need to reinvent the wheel | US income inequality

    The Mission review – a surgeon saves lives in war-torn Gaza in a visceral portrait of human endurance | Movies

    Recent Posts
    • Do you need electrolytes? Will tea cool you down? Is it safe to drink beer? How to stay hydrated in a heatwave | Health
    • When it comes to taxing the super rich, there’s no need to reinvent the wheel | US income inequality
    • The Mission review – a surgeon saves lives in war-torn Gaza in a visceral portrait of human endurance | Movies
    • Whereabouts of nearly 300 people with Ebola unknown in DR Congo | Global development
    • Nigel Farage’s anti-WHO campaign moves to US with allies added to board | Nigel Farage
    © 2026 naijaglobalnews. Designed by Pro.
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.