Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    The Guardian view on post-16 qualifications: the case for V-levels replacing BTecs is unproven | Editorial

    Decriminalising abortion: how could the House of Lords amend the legislation? | Abortion

    Impact of fewer jury trials on minorities | Trial by jury

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
    Naija Global News |
    Sunday, March 15
    • Business
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Education
    • Social Issues
    • Technology
    • More
      • Crime & Justice
      • Environment
      • Entertainment
    Naija Global News |
    You are at:Home»Sports»2025 college football SP+ rankings for all 136 FBS teams
    Sports

    2025 college football SP+ rankings for all 136 FBS teams

    onlyplanz_80y6mtBy onlyplanz_80y6mtSeptember 21, 2025009 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    2025 college football SP+ rankings for all 136 FBS teams
    Why Finebaum thinks Miami is for real this year (0:46)

    Paul Finebaum explains why he's all-in on Miami as a true championship contender. (0:46)

    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    • Bill ConnellySep 21, 2025, 12:35 PM ET

      Close

        Bill Connelly is a writer for ESPN. He covers college football, soccer and tennis. He has been at ESPN since 2019.

    Below are the current SP+ rankings, last updated after the games of Sept. 20 (minus the late-night USC-Michigan State game, which will be incorporated when full stats are available).

    What is SP+? In a single sentence, it’s a tempo- and opponent-adjusted measure of college football efficiency that I originally created at Football Outsiders in 2008. SP+ is intended to be predictive and forward-facing. It is not a résumé ranking, so it does not automatically give credit for big wins or particularly brave scheduling — no good predictive system does.

    It is simply a measure of the most sustainable and predictable aspects of football. If you’re lucky or unimpressive in a win, your rating will probably fall. If you’re strong and unlucky in a loss, it will probably rise.

    Note: Early in the season, ratings are based primarily on preseason projections, including special teams ratings. Over the course of the season, preseason numbers are slowly phased out from week to week.

    TeamRatingOffenseDefenseSpec TmsRk Chg1. Oregon (4-0)29.742.7 (1)13.3 (5)0.3 (5)+12. Penn St. (3-0)26.639.3 (9)12.8 (4)0.1 (36)-13. Ohio St. (3-0)26.537.5 (13)11.2 (2)0.2 (12)+14. Alabama (2-1)26.039.6 (7)13.8 (6)0.2 (18)-15. Tennessee (3-1)23.739.7 (6)16.3 (15)0.3 (8)+16. Indiana (4-0)23.539.0 (10)15.7 (11)0.2 (10)+87. Ole Miss (4-0)23.439.9 (5)16.8 (17)0.3 (4)-28. Texas Tech (4-0)23.341.2 (2)18.1 (22)0.2 (16)+49. Georgia (3-0)22.738.0 (11)15.8 (12)0.6 (1)-110. Oklahoma (4-0)21.934.4 (27)12.7 (3)0.2 (26)-311. Miami (4-0)21.140.6 (3)19.8 (27)0.3 (9)-212. Texas (3-1)21.031.4 (44)10.2 (1)-0.2 (111)+113. Missouri (4-0)20.537.7 (12)17.1 (18)-0.1 (103)-214. LSU (4-0)20.234.2 (29)14.1 (7)0.1 (44)+215. USC (4-0)18.140.3 (4)22.3 (43)0.1 (49)-516. Vanderbilt (4-0)17.937.0 (15)19.4 (25)0.2 (11)+1217. Michigan (3-1)17.932.2 (39)14.4 (8)0.1 (50)+018. Texas A&M (3-0)17.436.9 (17)19.6 (26)0.1 (29)+219. Utah (3-1)16.131.2 (45)15.1 (9)0.0 (58)-420. Nebraska (3-1)15.932.2 (38)16.3 (14)0.0 (82)+121. Notre Dame (1-2)15.535.9 (22)20.4 (32)-0.1 (100)+122. Arkansas (2-2)15.139.5 (8)24.5 (53)0.2 (23)+323. Auburn (3-1)14.932.3 (35)17.4 (21)-0.1 (95)-424. TCU (3-0)14.737.0 (16)22.2 (42)-0.1 (104)+025. BYU (3-0)14.530.7 (47)16.6 (16)0.3 (6)+226. Louisville (3-0)14.336.3 (20)22.0 (37)-0.1 (91)+027. Kansas (3-1)13.936.6 (18)22.7 (46)0.1 (43)+928. Washington (3-0)13.834.5 (26)20.5 (33)-0.2 (120)+429. Miss. St. (4-0)13.534.3 (28)21.1 (34)0.2 (24)+1830. Iowa St. (4-0)13.330.5 (49)17.3 (20)0.1 (39)-731. Florida St. (3-0)13.331.5 (42)18.4 (23)0.2 (25)+232. Ga. Tech (4-0)13.236.4 (19)23.3 (49)0.1 (47)+633. Maryland (4-0)13.129.0 (58)16.0 (13)0.1 (52)+1134. Memphis (4-0)12.637.4 (14)24.9 (55)0.1 (33)-335. Iowa (3-1)11.828.7 (61)17.1 (19)0.2 (21)-136. Illinois (3-1)11.633.3 (30)21.8 (36)0.1 (32)-1837. Arizona St. (3-1)10.832.3 (34)21.1 (35)-0.4 (136)+538. Kentucky (2-1)8.628.2 (64)19.9 (29)0.3 (7)+339. Pittsburgh (2-1)8.232.1 (41)24.1 (51)0.2 (13)-240. Florida (1-3)8.127.3 (66)19.3 (24)0.2 (22)-1141. Minnesota (2-1)7.923.6 (95)15.7 (10)0.0 (65)+742. Virginia (3-1)7.832.8 (33)25.1 (56)0.1 (34)+2143. Rutgers (3-1)7.734.8 (23)27.1 (67)-0.1 (88)+344. Clemson (1-3)7.629.8 (55)22.0 (38)-0.3 (128)-1445. Arizona (3-0)7.530.3 (51)23.0 (48)0.1 (30)-546. SMU (2-2)7.434.7 (24)27.3 (70)0.0 (56)-747. UCF (3-0)7.229.4 (56)22.1 (39)-0.1 (97)+1248. Cincinnati (2-1)6.628.8 (60)22.1 (40)0.0 (73)-549. Houston (3-0)6.526.4 (70)19.8 (28)-0.1 (106)+250. S. Carolina (2-2)6.326.3 (72)20.2 (30)0.2 (28)-551. Baylor (2-2)6.234.7 (25)28.7 (83)0.2 (14)-1652. Kansas St. (1-3)6.128.6 (62)22.7 (47)0.2 (20)+153. Navy (3-0)6.032.1 (40)25.9 (60)-0.2 (119)-354. JMU (2-1)5.328.8 (59)23.5 (50)0.0 (57)+855. N. Texas (4-0)5.136.3 (21)31.1 (94)0.0 (76)+1356. Syracuse (3-1)4.532.8 (32)28.3 (79)0.0 (69)+157. Boise St. (2-1)4.433.2 (31)28.5 (81)-0.3 (130)+358. Toledo (2-2)4.226.9 (68)22.7 (45)0.0 (68)+359. Michigan St. (3-1)4.126.1 (77)22.1 (41)0.2 (17)-160. Wisconsin (2-2)3.523.9 (93)20.3 (31)-0.1 (101)-861. Colorado (2-2)3.430.5 (50)27.0 (66)-0.1 (109)+862. Duke (2-2)3.030.7 (48)27.7 (73)-0.1 (85)+363. USF (3-1)2.530.2 (52)27.9 (75)0.2 (15)+764. NC St. (3-1)2.531.4 (43)28.8 (84)-0.1 (102)-865. Fresno St. (4-1)2.027.5 (65)25.4 (58)-0.1 (108)+866. Tulane (3-1)0.630.0 (54)29.4 (85)0.0 (71)-1767. Texas St. (3-1)0.332.3 (36)32.0 (100)0.0 (61)+1268. UTSA (2-2)0.032.2 (37)32.2 (101)0.0 (62)-269. ECU (2-2)-0.126.9 (69)26.8 (63)-0.1 (96)+370. Army (1-2)-0.125.9 (78)26.0 (61)-0.1 (86)-371. WKU (3-1)-0.826.1 (76)27.3 (68)0.5 (2)+672. California (3-1)-1.023.5 (96)24.5 (52)0.1 (45)-1873. Boston Coll. (1-2)-1.627.0 (67)28.4 (80)-0.2 (114)-974. UConn (2-2)-1.729.3 (57)31.1 (93)0.1 (48)+075. W. Virginia (2-2)-1.824.9 (83)26.8 (62)0.1 (42)-2076. UNLV (4-0)-2.531.1 (46)33.8 (115)0.2 (19)-177. La. Tech (3-1)-3.321.6 (106)24.7 (54)-0.1 (99)+1378. Wake Forest (2-1)-3.524.5 (88)28.0 (76)0.0 (72)-279. N. Carolina (2-2)-3.724.3 (89)28.2 (77)0.1 (41)-880. Utah St. (3-1)-3.830.2 (53)34.0 (117)0.0 (66)+1981. UCLA (0-3)-4.424.1 (92)28.6 (82)0.1 (35)+382. Va. Tech (1-3)-4.725.5 (80)30.3 (89)0.1 (31)+183. Purdue (2-2)-4.825.4 (82)30.2 (88)0.0 (54)-384. Oklahoma St. (1-2)-4.925.7 (79)30.7 (91)0.0 (60)-385. Northwestern (1-2)-4.917.5 (124)22.4 (44)-0.1 (90)+086. ODU (2-1)-5.026.4 (71)31.4 (97)0.0 (80)-487. J’ville St. (2-2)-5.026.1 (74)30.8 (92)-0.3 (135)+788. Ohio (2-2)-5.226.3 (73)31.2 (96)-0.3 (134)-189. San Diego St. (2-1)-5.419.8 (114)25.2 (57)0.0 (78)+690. Troy (2-2)-6.820.7 (110)27.5 (72)0.0 (74)+191. Air Force (1-2)-6.823.8 (94)30.5 (90)-0.2 (117)+592. Marshall (2-2)-7.225.5 (81)32.6 (106)-0.1 (87)+593. Delaware (3-1)-7.524.7 (86)32.0 (98)-0.2 (121)+2594. Liberty (1-3)-8.222.2 (103)30.2 (87)-0.3 (127)-695. Wyoming (2-2)-8.320.1 (113)28.3 (78)0.0 (75)-396. Tulsa (2-2)-8.321.6 (105)29.9 (86)0.0 (70)+1397. Buffalo (2-2)-9.018.8 (120)27.9 (74)0.1 (51)-898. Temple (2-2)-9.124.9 (84)33.9 (116)0.0 (77)+099. So. Miss (2-2)-9.323.1 (97)32.2 (102)-0.2 (110)+12100. Rice (3-1)-9.418.2 (122)27.3 (69)-0.2 (122)+8101. Stanford (1-3)-9.821.5 (107)31.2 (95)0.0 (83)-15102. Hawaii (3-2)-10.115.5 (130)25.8 (59)0.1 (46)+4103. San Jose St. (1-2)-10.422.4 (101)32.6 (107)-0.2 (118)+7104. FAU (1-2)-10.722.8 (100)33.4 (111)-0.1 (98)-3105. Louisiana (1-3)-10.821.8 (104)32.7 (109)0.1 (38)-12106. App. St. (2-1)-11.122.3 (102)33.3 (110)-0.1 (105)-6107. Colorado St. (1-2)-11.321.4 (108)32.6 (108)-0.1 (92)+5108. Ga. Southern (2-2)-11.426.1 (75)37.5 (126)0.1 (53)+8109. UAB (2-2)-11.428.4 (63)39.8 (132)0.0 (55)+6110. S. Alabama (1-3)-11.623.0 (98)34.4 (119)-0.2 (113)-32111. Wash. St. (2-2)-11.924.6 (87)36.4 (123)0.0 (79)-9112. BGSU (2-2)-11.920.4 (112)32.3 (103)0.0 (64)-9113. Kennesaw St. (2-2)-12.114.8 (131)26.9 (65)0.0 (67)+10114. Oregon St. (0-4)-12.423.0 (99)35.2 (121)-0.2 (115)-10115. N. Illinois (1-2)-12.514.7 (133)26.9 (64)-0.2 (125)-8116. Miami-OH (0-3)-12.814.3 (135)27.4 (71)0.4 (3)-2117. Arkansas St. (1-3)-12.824.1 (90)37.0 (125)0.1 (37)-12118. UTEP (1-3)-13.219.6 (116)32.5 (104)-0.3 (133)+1119. FIU (2-2)-14.019.7 (115)33.5 (113)-0.2 (124)-6120. Coastal Caro. (2-2)-14.119.4 (117)33.4 (112)0.0 (84)+1121. New Mexico (2-1)-14.124.8 (85)38.7 (130)-0.1 (107)-4122. Missouri St. (2-2)-14.324.1 (91)38.1 (129)-0.2 (123)+7123. WMU (1-3)-14.617.4 (125)32.0 (99)-0.1 (89)-1124. Nevada (1-3)-14.717.9 (123)32.5 (105)0.0 (81)-4125. Charlotte (1-3)-17.518.4 (121)35.9 (122)0.0 (59)-1126. New Mex. St. (2-1)-17.718.9 (119)36.8 (124)0.1 (40)+0127. CMU (2-2)-18.515.8 (129)34.3 (118)0.0 (63)+5128. ULM (2-1)-18.815.9 (128)34.5 (120)-0.2 (112)+0129. Akron (1-3)-19.014.7 (132)33.6 (114)-0.1 (93)+6130. Ball St. (1-3)-20.419.0 (118)39.2 (131)-0.2 (116)+4131. EMU (1-3)-20.820.8 (109)41.7 (135)0.2 (27)-1132. Georgia St. (1-3)-21.420.5 (111)41.6 (134)-0.3 (129)-5133. Sam Houston (0-4)-23.214.6 (134)37.6 (127)-0.3 (131)-8134. MTSU (1-3)-24.014.0 (136)38.0 (128)-0.1 (94)-1135. Kent St. (1-3)-25.016.4 (126)41.1 (133)-0.3 (132)-4136. UMass (0-3)-29.715.9 (127)45.4 (136)-0.3 (126)+0

    Within this page, we will also update the SP+ strength of schedule and résumé SP+ ratings each week. Obviously these ratings aren’t of much use early in a given season, but their relevance will increase as the race for College Football Playoff spots becomes more prevalent. Here’s how they’re defined.

    SP+ strength of schedule is based on the expected win percentage an average top-five team (per SP+) would generate against each team’s schedule. An SOS rating of .850, for instance, signifies that the average top-five team would be expected to win an average of 85.0% of its games, or 10.2 projected wins over a 12-game schedule. A lower expected win percentage signifies a harder schedule, so the lowest SOS rating ranks first.

    Résumé SP+ compares each team’s scoring margin (capped at 50 points for a given game) to what an average top-five team would be expected to generate against a given opponent. If a top-five opponent would be projected to win a game by 10.0 points, and a team wins by 15 instead, that’s a +5.0 rating for that game. By the end of the season, only a handful of teams will have a positive rating because clearing a top-five bar is obviously very difficult. (Note: A seven-point penalty for losses is applied to the rating as well, meaning your rating has seven points deducted for each loss.)

    TeamSP+ RatingSOS (Rk)Résumé SP+ (Rk)1. Oregon (4-0)29.70.972 (117)6.0 (2)2. Penn St. (3-0)26.60.991 (135)0.0 (6)3. Ohio St. (3-0)26.50.874 (31)-0.4 (7)4. Alabama (2-1)26.00.911 (61)-14.4 (34)5. Tennessee (3-1)23.70.874 (33)-7.1 (17)6. Indiana (4-0)23.50.948 (92)8.1 (1)7. Ole Miss (4-0)23.40.893 (44)-1.1 (9)8. Texas Tech (4-0)23.30.932 (88)1.1 (5)9. Georgia (3-0)22.70.843 (16)-2.6 (11)10. Oklahoma (4-0)21.90.856 (24)1.8 (4)11. Miami (4-0)21.10.892 (43)-0.6 (8)12. Texas (3-1)21.00.870 (29)-15.4 (36)13. Missouri (4-0)20.50.918 (73)-1.9 (10)14. LSU (4-0)20.20.920 (75)-3.5 (15)15. USC (4-0)18.10.969 (113)-2.9 (13)16. Vanderbilt (4-0)17.90.970 (114)-2.7 (12)17. Michigan (3-1)17.90.838 (13)-17.4 (38)18. Texas A&M (3-0)17.40.891 (42)-8.5 (20)19. Utah (3-1)16.10.880 (36)-13.5 (32)20. Nebraska (3-1)15.90.901 (53)-12.9 (30)21. Notre Dame (1-2)15.50.775 (3)-21.9 (48)22. Arkansas (2-2)15.10.844 (17)-20.2 (43)23. Auburn (3-1)14.90.876 (34)-18.6 (39)24. TCU (3-0)14.70.952 (97)-9.1 (21)25. BYU (3-0)14.50.979 (124)-5.7 (16)26. Louisville (3-0)14.30.963 (106)-10.3 (25)27. Kansas (3-1)13.90.885 (39)-13.3 (31)28. Washington (3-0)13.80.990 (133)-3.3 (14)29. Miss. St. (4-0)13.50.953 (99)-9.9 (24)30. Iowa St. (4-0)13.30.928 (84)-12.0 (28)31. Florida St. (3-0)13.30.839 (14)4.4 (3)32. Ga. Tech (4-0)13.20.949 (93)-12.1 (29)33. Maryland (4-0)13.10.973 (120)-11.4 (26)34. Memphis (4-0)12.60.931 (87)-11.9 (27)35. Iowa (3-1)11.80.917 (70)-21.4 (46)36. Illinois (3-1)11.60.873 (30)-20.1 (42)37. Arizona St. (3-1)10.80.903 (55)-21.1 (45)38. Kentucky (2-1)8.60.831 (9)-22.4 (49)39. Pittsburgh (2-1)8.20.986 (131)-24.1 (51)40. Florida (1-3)8.10.803 (6)-37.5 (77)41. Minnesota (2-1)7.90.982 (126)-28.1 (55)42. Virginia (3-1)7.80.979 (123)-17.1 (37)43. Rutgers (3-1)7.70.950 (94)-23.0 (50)44. Clemson (1-3)7.60.834 (10)-42.4 (89)45. Arizona (3-0)7.50.963 (104)-7.1 (18)46. SMU (2-2)7.40.917 (71)-36.3 (72)47. UCF (3-0)7.20.982 (125)-9.8 (22)48. Cincinnati (2-1)6.60.912 (63)-19.4 (41)49. Houston (3-0)6.50.967 (110)-8.3 (19)50. S. Carolina (2-2)6.30.831 (8)-34.4 (68)51. Baylor (2-2)6.20.874 (32)-33.0 (65)52. Kansas St. (1-3)6.10.902 (54)-46.6 (99)53. Navy (3-0)6.00.991 (134)-14.3 (33)54. JMU (2-1)5.30.922 (76)-26.0 (53)55. N. Texas (4-0)5.10.983 (129)-9.9 (23)56. Syracuse (3-1)4.50.851 (20)-21.1 (44)57. Boise St. (2-1)4.40.969 (112)-34.7 (70)58. Toledo (2-2)4.20.954 (100)-31.4 (62)59. Michigan St. (3-1)4.10.913 (67)-29.6 (58)60. Wisconsin (2-2)3.50.825 (7)-37.5 (78)61. Colorado (2-2)3.40.913 (64)-34.6 (69)62. Duke (2-2)3.00.925 (79)-37.4 (74)63. USF (3-1)2.50.856 (23)-19.1 (40)64. NC St. (3-1)2.50.929 (85)-28.9 (56)65. Fresno St. (4-1)2.00.950 (95)-29.2 (57)66. Tulane (3-1)0.60.869 (28)-32.3 (63)67. Texas St. (3-1)0.30.945 (91)-30.2 (59)68. UTSA (2-2)0.00.911 (60)-39.9 (84)69. ECU (2-2)-0.10.927 (82)-30.7 (61)70. Army (1-2)-0.10.918 (74)-38.8 (80)71. WKU (3-1)-0.80.976 (122)-32.8 (64)72. California (3-1)-1.00.961 (102)-34.1 (67)73. Boston Coll. (1-2)-1.60.969 (111)-37.4 (75)74. UConn (2-2)-1.70.972 (119)-39.5 (82)75. W. Virginia (2-2)-1.80.905 (58)-39.0 (81)76. UNLV (4-0)-2.50.990 (132)-33.3 (66)77. La. Tech (3-1)-3.30.897 (49)-21.6 (47)78. Wake Forest (2-1)-3.50.975 (121)-36.3 (73)79. N. Carolina (2-2)-3.70.915 (68)-45.3 (95)80. Utah St. (3-1)-3.80.923 (77)-25.6 (52)81. UCLA (0-3)-4.40.899 (50)-69.3 (133)82. Va. Tech (1-3)-4.70.896 (48)-54.5 (115)83. Purdue (2-2)-4.80.854 (22)-35.4 (71)84. Oklahoma St. (1-2)-4.90.800 (5)-52.9 (113)85. Northwestern (1-2)-4.90.788 (4)-39.6 (83)86. ODU (2-1)-5.00.848 (18)-15.0 (35)87. J’ville St. (2-2)-5.00.966 (107)-41.6 (87)88. Ohio (2-2)-5.20.836 (11)-39.9 (85)89. San Diego St. (2-1)-5.40.983 (128)-26.1 (54)90. Troy (2-2)-6.80.917 (72)-45.8 (97)91. Air Force (1-2)-6.80.960 (101)-44.0 (92)92. Marshall (2-2)-7.20.899 (51)-46.9 (101)93. Delaware (3-1)-7.50.970 (115)-37.5 (76)94. Liberty (1-3)-8.20.967 (109)-59.9 (124)95. Wyoming (2-2)-8.30.912 (62)-44.4 (93)96. Tulsa (2-2)-8.30.967 (108)-46.4 (98)97. Buffalo (2-2)-9.00.963 (105)-45.5 (96)98. Temple (2-2)-9.10.850 (19)-38.2 (79)99. So. Miss (2-2)-9.30.933 (89)-41.0 (86)100. Rice (3-1)-9.40.972 (116)-42.7 (90)101. Stanford (1-3)-9.80.901 (52)-56.0 (118)102. Hawaii (3-2)-10.10.961 (103)-48.9 (107)103. San Jose St. (1-2)-10.40.878 (35)-52.7 (112)104. FAU (1-2)-10.70.927 (81)-47.9 (103)105. Louisiana (1-3)-10.80.907 (59)-59.8 (123)106. App. St. (2-1)-11.10.994 (136)-44.7 (94)107. Colorado St. (1-2)-11.30.913 (66)-48.3 (105)108. Ga. Southern (2-2)-11.40.904 (57)-50.2 (109)109. UAB (2-2)-11.40.861 (26)-48.0 (104)110. S. Alabama (1-3)-11.60.928 (83)-57.8 (120)111. Wash. St. (2-2)-11.90.915 (69)-53.7 (114)112. BGSU (2-2)-11.90.913 (65)-43.5 (91)113. Kennesaw St. (2-2)-12.10.882 (37)-49.4 (108)114. Oregon St. (0-4)-12.40.719 (1)-64.0 (127)115. N. Illinois (1-2)-12.50.854 (21)-46.6 (100)116. Miami-OH (0-3)-12.80.925 (80)-60.8 (125)117. Arkansas St. (1-3)-12.80.883 (38)-57.0 (119)118. UTEP (1-3)-13.20.904 (56)-56.0 (117)119. FIU (2-2)-14.00.868 (27)-47.1 (102)120. Coastal Caro. (2-2)-14.10.953 (98)-59.0 (122)121. New Mexico (2-1)-14.10.895 (46)-30.4 (60)122. Missouri St. (2-2)-14.30.895 (47)-50.4 (110)123. WMU (1-3)-14.60.890 (41)-55.1 (116)124. Nevada (1-3)-14.70.860 (25)-61.0 (126)125. Charlotte (1-3)-17.50.984 (130)-66.7 (131)126. New Mex. St. (2-1)-17.70.983 (127)-48.5 (106)127. CMU (2-2)-18.50.894 (45)-51.7 (111)128. ULM (2-1)-18.80.837 (12)-41.9 (88)129. Akron (1-3)-19.00.929 (86)-58.4 (121)130. Ball St. (1-3)-20.40.923 (78)-65.2 (128)131. EMU (1-3)-20.80.950 (96)-66.6 (130)132. Georgia St. (1-3)-21.40.772 (2)-66.1 (129)133. Sam Houston (0-4)-23.20.890 (40)-77.9 (135)134. MTSU (1-3)-24.00.972 (118)-70.1 (134)135. Kent St. (1-3)-25.00.840 (15)-69.2 (132)136. UMass (0-3)-29.70.939 (90)-78.5 (136)

    College FBS Football rankings Teams
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleNew Jersey Show Finds Band at Peak
    Next Article Chatbot site depicting child sexual abuse images raises fears over misuse of AI | Artificial intelligence (AI)
    onlyplanz_80y6mt
    • Website

    Related Posts

    What Canceling ‘Magic City Monday’ Conveys to College Women Who Work in Strip Clubs

    March 14, 2026

    Holistic Support Boosts Community College Outcomes

    March 12, 2026

    Women Crowdsource Funding for Barber-Scotia College

    March 12, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Watch Lady Gaga’s Perform ‘Vanish Into You’ on ‘Colbert’

    September 9, 20251 Views

    Advertisers flock to Fox seeking an ‘audience of one’ — Donald Trump

    July 13, 20251 Views

    A Setback for Maine’s Free Community College Program

    June 19, 20251 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    At Chile’s Vera Rubin Observatory, Earth’s Largest Camera Surveys the Sky

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    SpaceX Starship Explodes Before Test Fire

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    How the L.A. Port got hit by Trump’s Tariffs

    By onlyplanz_80y6mtJune 19, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    Watch Lady Gaga’s Perform ‘Vanish Into You’ on ‘Colbert’

    September 9, 20251 Views

    Advertisers flock to Fox seeking an ‘audience of one’ — Donald Trump

    July 13, 20251 Views

    A Setback for Maine’s Free Community College Program

    June 19, 20251 Views
    Our Picks

    The Guardian view on post-16 qualifications: the case for V-levels replacing BTecs is unproven | Editorial

    Decriminalising abortion: how could the House of Lords amend the legislation? | Abortion

    Impact of fewer jury trials on minorities | Trial by jury

    Recent Posts
    • The Guardian view on post-16 qualifications: the case for V-levels replacing BTecs is unproven | Editorial
    • Decriminalising abortion: how could the House of Lords amend the legislation? | Abortion
    • Impact of fewer jury trials on minorities | Trial by jury
    • The Guardian view on weight-loss jabs and addiction: there is too much moralising about these remarkable medicines | Editorial
    • Beyond the strait: why attacks on Kargh Island could keep oil prices high | Oil
    © 2026 naijaglobalnews. Designed by Pro.
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.