{"id":51615,"date":"2026-08-04T11:03:33","date_gmt":"2026-08-04T11:03:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/?p=51615"},"modified":"2026-08-04T11:03:33","modified_gmt":"2026-08-04T11:03:33","slug":"inside-the-spending-of-aipac-one-of-the-u-s-s-largest-super-pacs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/?p=51615","title":{"rendered":"Inside the Spending of AIPAC, One of the U.S.’s Largest Super PACs"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n<\/p>\n

In less than five years, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee has become one of the biggest spenders in American elections, flooding the airwaves in congressional races across the country.<\/p>\n

Since its first involvement in elections, the amount of money AIPAC-affiliated political action committees have spent on campaign advertising and outreach to voters has more than doubled, from $29.3 million to $67.2 million, with much of it spent in Democratic primaries.<\/p>\n

The group\u2019s biggest test yet will come in Tuesday\u2019s Democratic Senate primary election in Michigan. AIPAC has spent more than $30 million on ads and outreach promoting Representative Haley Stevens over her opponent, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, according to the Federal Election Commission. Dr. El-Sayed, who has run a sharply anti-Israel campaign, has made the group\u2019s involvement a key part of his criticism of Ms. Haley\u2019s candidacy.<\/p>\n

The spending \u2014 in Michigan and across the country \u2014 marks a significant shift for the group, which for decades was a bipartisan lobbying organization focused on influencing federal legislation and sending members of Congress to Israel. But, alarmed by what it saw as a rising tide of anti-Israel sentiment from Democrats, the group quickly became a major player in federal elections.<\/p>\n

In 2022, AIPAC created a super PAC that has spent more money on TV, radio and digital ads in federal elections over the past three election cycles than any other special interest group not linked to a political party, according to a Times analysis of data collected by AdImpact, a media tracking firm. AIPAC\u2019s rapid growth in election spending, both through its super PAC and other new affiliated organizations, makes clear how significant the issue of Israel has become in American politics \u2014 but also how complicated.<\/p>\n

Some of the campaign advertisements produced for AIPAC are aimed at supporting candidates the group sees as pro-Israel. Others are designed to defeat candidates the group views as out of step with its policy agenda.<\/p>\n

But one factor unites them: Almost none of the ads mention Israel.<\/p>\n

Between April 2022 and the end of last month, AIPAC funded 109 TV and digital ads in American elections, according to a New York Times analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n

Between April 2022 and the end of last month, AIPAC funded 109 TV and digital ads in American elections, according to a New York Times analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n

But only six of those ads refer to Israel.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

But only six of those ads refer to Israel.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The ads financed by AIPAC-related groups have most commonly focused on issues that polling suggests are bigger priorities for many voters \u2014 including abortion rights and the economy \u2014 even though they were specifically intended to boost candidates who support Israel. The strategy, which is used by other political groups too, has at times allowed AIPAC to obscure its involvement in campaigns.<\/p>\n

When AIPAC supporters moved to create their super PAC, called United Democracy Project, in 2022, they were keenly aware of both the rising cost of political campaigns and the growing number of candidates who were critical of U.S. support for Israel. After the Hamas attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, donations from individuals to United Democracy Project spiked, helping it to ramp up its political efforts. So far in primary elections this year it has outspent various super PACs funded by the A.I. and cryptocurrency industries, two other powerful groups, on campaign advertising.<\/p>\n

Much of AIPAC\u2019s money, through the United Democracy Project and other smaller political action committees, has been spent in Democratic primaries. Because it views itself as bipartisan, the group has rarely spent money in general election races where it would be forced to pick between a Democrat and Republican.<\/p>\n

AIPAC spending in primaries and general elections<\/h3>\n

Total spending in the 2022, 2024 and 2026 election cycles.<\/p>\n

Primary races<\/p>\n

$138 million<\/p>\n

General elections<\/p>\n

$4.65 million<\/p>\n

Note: Figures for 2022 and 2024 are adjusted for inflation.<\/span> The New York Times<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cOur goal is to elect the largest bipartisan pro-Israel majority,\u201d said Patrick Dorton, a spokesman for the United Democracy Project. \u201cThe pro-Israel community is energized,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

Mr. Dorton said that many other super PACs employ a similar messaging strategy: creating ads about the top issues for voters in the district, rather than the specific issue the group cares most about.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn most races affordability issues are much more important than Israel,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Even though its ads rarely mention Israel, by spending so much in primaries, AIPAC has attracted significant attention to itself and U.S.-Israel policy, said Brendan Glavin, director of insights at OpenSecrets, which tracks campaign spending. \u201cWhether or not they are trying to hide behind the content of the ads, it is coming out who is behind the money, and ensures that this stays a hot-button issue,\u201d Mr. Glavin said.<\/p>\n

In the past three election cycles, the group has mostly succeeded in its efforts, helping to elect 15 members of Congress considered allies. It has placed some of its largest bets yet on several races this year \u2014 most notably in Michigan, Illinois and Maryland.<\/p>\n

In all, AIPAC-affiliated groups have spent more than $67 million so far this year. In Michigan, United Democracy Project has spent more than $10 million supporting Ms. Stevens\u2019s Senate bid and more than $20 million attacking her opponent, Dr. El-Sayed, through ads and voter outreach, according to F.E.C. filings. Only one outside group has spent more on television, radio and digital ads in a primary race so far this year: a political action committee formed to oppose Tom Steyer\u2019s unsuccessful run for California governor.<\/p>\n

The Michigan race is the first time United Democracy Project has spent in a Senate contest, but with $80 million in cash on hand, it may not be the last.<\/p>\n

When United Democracy Project was formed in 2022, the group spent more money supporting candidates than attacking politicians it viewed as its opposition. That changed in 2024, when it spent nearly $25 million in successful efforts to defeat Representative Jamaal Bowman of New York and Representative Cori Bush of Missouri, who were vociferous critics of Israel. (The Times has adjusted pre-2026 dollar figures for inflation.) This year, the group has spent more money on supporting candidates than opposing them \u2014 at least so far.<\/p>\n

And while AIPAC spent exclusively on Democratic primaries in its first year, it began to focus on Republican primaries in 2024, targeting several who had sharply questioned American support for Israel: Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Bob Good in Virginia, former Representative John Hostettler of Indiana and challenger Brandon Herrera of Texas. AIPAC helped defeat all of them except Mr. Massie.<\/p>\n

AIPAC spending in primaries by party<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

Note: Figures for 2022 and 2024 are adjusted for inflation.<\/span> The New York Times<\/span><\/p>\n

This year, one of the group\u2019s most high-profile wins was the ouster of Mr. Massie, a seven-term congressman who has called for ending military aid to Israel.<\/p>\n

Overall, AIPAC has notched many significant victories. Its first came in 2022, when the group spent nearly $5 million supporting Ms. Stevens in her successful bid to oust Representative Andy Levin, a former synagogue president who described himself as a Zionist but was critical of Israeli policies.<\/p>\n

How AIPAC fared in each race<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

20228<\/span>3<\/span>0<\/span>0<\/span>202410<\/span>3<\/span>0<\/span>0<\/span>20264<\/span>2<\/span>1<\/span>2<\/span> <\/p>\n

Note: When AIPAC supported and\/or opposed multiple candidates in a single race, only AIPAC\u2019s largest investment in the race was counted. \u201cMixed\u201d refers to the 2026 New Jersey Democratic primary in a special election, in which AIPAC spent money to successfully oppose Tom Malinowski, who lost the race, but to a candidate who was even more critical of Israel. Democratic primaries for Michigan\u2019s Senate race and Missouri\u2019s First Congressional District haven\u2019t been held yet.<\/span> The New York Times<\/span><\/p>\n

But the group has also faced losses among its top targets. In 2022, it spent roughly $3 million in a Democratic House primary against Summer Lee of Pennsylvania, who has opposed military aid to Israel. Ms. Lee narrowly won the primary. The group then spent more than $1 million against her in the general election, which she also won, defeating a Republican by more than 12 percentage points.<\/p>\n

In New Jersey this year, United Democracy Project spent more than $2 million in a special election trying to defeat Tom Malinowski, a Democrat who is broadly supportive of Israel but has called for more conditions on American aid. Mr. Malinowski lost in a Democratic primary, but the victor was a candidate with positions even further from AIPAC\u2019s: Analilia Mejia, a former aide to Senator Bernie Sanders, who has accused Israel of genocide. Ms. Mejia went on to win the special election too. Still, supporters of AIPAC argued that their money had been well-spent. Had Mr. Malinowski won, they said, he might have had more influence on foreign affairs policy because he was a more senior Democrat with strong ties to House leadership.<\/p>\n

In addition to United Democracy Project, a Times analysis identified five smaller super PACs that AIPAC has funneled roughly $22 million into since 2022. None of those smaller committees mention Israel in their names, allowing AIPAC to try to influence elections without making its involvement immediately clear.<\/p>\n

Spending by AIPAC-affiliated groups<\/h3>\n

Data for the 2022, 2024 and 2026 election cycles.<\/p>\n

Voters for Responsive Government<\/p>\n

Chicago Progressive Partnership<\/p>\n

Note: Figures for 2022 and 2024 are adjusted for inflation.<\/span> The New York Times<\/span><\/p>\n

In one case, the strategy appeared to backfire. In Chicago, the new AIPAC-funded groups spent roughly $7 million to try to elect Laura Fine over Daniel Biss and other candidates in a Democratic House primary. After news reports showed the groups\u2019 ties to AIPAC, Mr. Biss relentlessly hammered Ms. Fine for that support. Mr. Biss won the election.<\/p>\n

All the candidates supported and opposed by AIPAC funds<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

Group by<\/span> <\/p>\n

OutcomeSupport or opposePartyStateElection cycle<\/p>\n

Succeeded in supporting<\/span> 15
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tcandidates \u00b7
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t$41.7 million<\/span><\/h3>\n
    \n
  • \n

    Adrian Boafo<\/h4>\n

    Maryland\u00a05th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

    $5.73 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    George Latimer<\/h4>\n

    New York\u00a016th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

    $5.01 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sarah Elfreth<\/h4>\n

    Maryland\u00a03rd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

    $4.43 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Donna Miller<\/h4>\n

    Illinois\u00a02nd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

    $4.38 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Haley Stevens<\/h4>\n

    Michigan\u00a011st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

    $4.35 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Melissa Luburich Bean<\/h4>\n

    Illinois\u00a08th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

    $3.99 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wesley Bell<\/h4>\n

    Missouri\u00a01st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

    $3.55 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Valerie Foushee<\/h4>\n

    North Carolina\u00a04th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

    $2.37 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Don Davis<\/h4>\n

    North Carolina\u00a01st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

    $2.36 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Glenn Ivey<\/h4>\n

    Maryland\u00a04th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

    $1.95 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jimmy Gomez<\/h4>\n

    California\u00a034th \u00b7 General \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

    $1.8 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kevin Mullin<\/h4>\n

    California\u00a015th \u00b7 General \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

    $662,419<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ed Gallrein<\/h4>\n

    Kentucky\u00a04th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

    $579,319<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Henry Cuellar<\/h4>\n

    Texas\u00a028th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

    $458,468<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shontel Brown<\/h4>\n

    Ohio\u00a011st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

    $90,627<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Succeeded in opposing<\/span> 19
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\tcandidates \u00b7
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t$39.2 million<\/span><\/h3>\n
      \n
    • \n

      Jamaal Bowman<\/h4>\n

      New York\u00a016th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $10.4 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Cori Bush<\/h4>\n

      Missouri\u00a01st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $5.53 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Donna Edwards<\/h4>\n

      Maryland\u00a04th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

      $4.75 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Thomas Massie<\/h4>\n

      Kentucky\u00a04th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

      $3.58 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Susheela Jayapal<\/h4>\n

      Oregon\u00a03rd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $3.44 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Mary Waters<\/h4>\n

      Michigan\u00a013rd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $2.39 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      John Hostettler<\/h4>\n

      Indiana\u00a08th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $1.65 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Jessica Cisneros<\/h4>\n

      Texas\u00a028th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

      $1.61 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Katherine M. Abughazaleh<\/h4>\n

      Illinois\u00a09th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

      $1.18 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Brandon Herrera<\/h4>\n

      Texas\u00a023rd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $1.12 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Junaid Ahmed<\/h4>\n

      Illinois\u00a08th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

      $663,879<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      David Kim<\/h4>\n

      California\u00a034th \u00b7 General \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $610,335<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Cristina Garcia<\/h4>\n

      California\u00a042nd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

      $579,608<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Kina Collins<\/h4>\n

      Illinois\u00a07th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $512,487<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Andy Levin<\/h4>\n

      Michigan\u00a011st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

      $384,605<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Erica Smith<\/h4>\n

      North Carolina\u00a01st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

      $377,426<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Nina Turner<\/h4>\n

      Ohio\u00a011st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

      $223,790<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Bob Good<\/h4>\n

      Virginia\u00a05th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

      $140,002<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Jason Friedman<\/h4>\n

      Illinois\u00a07th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

      $59,748<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Mixed record<\/span> 1
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\tcandidate \u00b7
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t$2.33 million<\/span><\/h3>\n

      Failed in supporting<\/span> 7
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\tcandidates \u00b7
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t$13.4 million<\/span><\/h3>\n
        \n
      • \n

        Melissa Conyears-Ervin<\/h4>\n

        Illinois\u00a07th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

        $4.97 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Laura Fine<\/h4>\n

        Illinois\u00a09th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

        $4.38 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Adam Hollier<\/h4>\n

        Michigan\u00a013rd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

        $3.08 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Steven Irwin<\/h4>\n

        Pennsylvania\u00a012nd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

        $741,875<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Joanna Weiss<\/h4>\n

        California\u00a047th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

        $110,684<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Bushra Amiwala<\/h4>\n

        Illinois\u00a09th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

        $104,555<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Shakira Hawkins<\/h4>\n

        Michigan\u00a013rd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

        $55,628<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        Failed in opposing<\/span> 7
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\tcandidates \u00b7
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t$11.9 million<\/span><\/h3>\n
          \n
        • \n

          Dave Min<\/h4>\n

          California\u00a047th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

          $4.88 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          Summer Lee<\/h4>\n

          Pennsylvania\u00a012nd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

          $2.28 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          Shri Thanedar<\/h4>\n

          Michigan\u00a013rd \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

          $1.61 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          Daniel Biss<\/h4>\n

          Illinois\u00a09th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

          $1.43 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          Summer Lee<\/h4>\n

          Pennsylvania\u00a012nd \u00b7 General \u00b7 2022<\/p>\n

          $1.41 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          Thomas Massie<\/h4>\n

          Kentucky\u00a04th \u00b7 General \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

          $176,826<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          Thomas Massie<\/h4>\n

          Kentucky\u00a04th \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2024<\/p>\n

          $159,783<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          Not yet known<\/span> 4
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\tcandidates \u00b7
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t$33.8 million<\/span><\/h3>\n
            \n
          • \n

            Abdul El-Sayed<\/h4>\n

            Michigan\u00a0Senate \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

            $20.1 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            Haley Stevens<\/h4>\n

            Michigan\u00a0Senate \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

            $10.5 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            Cori Bush<\/h4>\n

            Missouri\u00a01st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

            $2.46 million<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            Wesley Bell<\/h4>\n

            Missouri\u00a01st \u00b7 Primary \u00b7 2026<\/p>\n

            $685,626<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            Note: Figures for 2022 and 2024 are adjusted for inflation. \u201cMixed record\u201d refers to the 2026 New Jersey Democratic primary in a special election, in which AIPAC spent money to successfully oppose Tom Malinowski, who lost the race, but to a candidate who was even more critical of Israel.<\/span> The New York Times<\/span><\/p>\n

            About the data<\/p>\n

            The Times identified six federal super PACs \u2014 political committees that spend money on ads and outreach to support or oppose candidates \u2014 that have been affiliated with AIPAC since the 2022 election cycle. One is United Democracy Project, AIPAC\u2019s official super PAC. The Times included five other super PACs because they met two conditions: Contributions from UDP or an AIPAC-affiliated political action committee accounted for at least one third of the non-individual contributions the super PAC received, and it received no contributions from any other PAC.<\/p>\n

            Spending numbers include all spending in support or opposition of a candidate from Jan. 1, 2022, through July 31 of this year, based on the committees\u2019 Federal Election Commission filings.<\/p>\n

            To evaluate the success of AIPAC\u2019s investments in races, The Times first identified the candidate who AIPAC spent the most money to support or oppose. The Times considered AIPAC to have succeeded if that candidate won with its support or lost with its opposition.<\/p>\n

            To analyze the content of television and digital ads, The Times reviewed videos that were gathered by AdImpact, a media tracking firm. The Times excluded ads that were shortened or substantially similar versions of other ads.<\/p>\n

            The Times adjusted 2022 and 2024 dollar figures for inflation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

            In less than five years, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee has become one of the biggest spenders in American elections, flooding the airwaves in congressional races across the country. Since its first involvement in elections, the amount of money AIPAC-affiliated political action committees have spent on campaign advertising and outreach to voters has more<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":51616,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56],"tags":[25127,64,10738,1580,3687,20684],"class_list":{"0":"post-51615","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-crime-justice","8":"tag-aipac","9":"tag-largest","10":"tag-pacs","11":"tag-spending","12":"tag-super","13":"tag-u-s-s"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=51615"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51615\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/51616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=51615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=51615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=51615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}