\n<\/p>\n
I<\/span>n 1945, the violinist Yehudi Menuhin was on a short tour of Germany, offering recitals to survivors of the concentration camps. On Friday 27 July 1945 he reached Bergen-Belsen, liberated three months earlier, and gave two concerts, in the cinema at the camp. The experience had a profound impact. \u201cI shall not forget that afternoon as long as I live,\u201d said Menuhin. \u201cAfter Belsen, Yehudi was never the same again,\u201d his sister Yaltah Menuhin reported. Anita Lasker, a survivor of Belsen, was present at one of those concerts. Nineteen years old, and a cellist, as a child she had been at Auschwitz, where she played in the women\u2019s orchestra, under the direction of Alma Ros\u00e9, the niece of Gustav Mahler.<\/p>\n Lasker wrote to her cousin about the concert. \u201cWho would ever have believed that Belsen Camp would hear Yehudi Menuhin playing? A wonderful evening\u201d, which included \u201cthe Bach\/Kreisler Prelude and Fugue, the Kreutzer Sonata, Mendelssohn\u2019s Concerto, something by Debussy and several smaller, unfamiliar items\u201d.<\/p>\n Lasker\u2019s eye for detail was unsparing. Menuhin\u2019s attire \u201cbordered on the slovenly, which matched the surroundings perfectly\u201d. He played \u201cfaultlessly\u201d, but she sensed he held back. Perhaps he was not inspired by the atmosphere, she wondered (\u201cit was impossible to get complete silence in the hall, and I was thoroughly ashamed of the audience\u201d).<\/p>\n <\/span>\u2018Who would ever have believed that Belsen camp would hear Yehudi Menuhin playing?\u2019 \u2026 Menuhin in 1944. <\/span> Photograph: AP<\/p>\n Lasker noted, too, that Menuhin performed with a pianist, whose name she omitted. He left an impression: \u201cAs for his accompanist, I can only say that I cannot imagine anything done more beautifully. He was completely unobtrusive and yet I found myself transfixed by him sitting there as if he wouldn\u2019t say boo to a goose \u2013 but playing to perfection.\u201d<\/p>\n Lasker\u2019s memory never faded. She later told an interviewer. \u201cI couldn\u2019t take my eyes off that guy who was playing the piano, and that was Benjamin Britten.\u201d<\/p>\n In the 1960s, Lasker-Wallfisch, as she became following her marriage to pianist Peter Wallfisch, would perform with \u201cthe guy who played the piano\u201d. She came to Aldeburgh, as a member of the English Chamber Orchestra (which she had helped to establish in 1948, originally as the Goldsbrough Orchestra). On several occasions she was in the cello section when Britten was the piano soloist or conductor. He was \u201cvery much a man apart, you didn\u2019t chat to him really\u201d, she recalled. \u201cYou accepted Britten as Britten, and that was that!\u201d<\/p>\n In 1969, shortly before the festival opened, Lasker-Wallfisch showed Britten the letter she\u2019d written after the Belsen concert: \u201cI said to Ben, if you\u2019d like to read a letter about your piano playing, by somebody who didn\u2019t know at all who was who, very unbiased criticism. He was fascinated with the letter. He said: \u2018Can I borrow it?\u2019 I said: \u2018Of course.\u2019\u201d The next day, the Snape Maltings concert hall was destroyed by a fire. The cellist and the composer saw each other the following morning at rehearsal, in the nearby village of Thorpeness.<\/p>\n \u201cHe came in and the first thing he said was, \u2018Anita, I\u2019ve got your letter.\u2019\u201d Lasker-Wallfisch was stunned: he\u2019d lost his piano, and the Maltings, and still he recognised the significance of the letter.<\/p>\n Menuhin would say that Britten insisted on joining him on the tour. Like the violinist, he was \u201ccasting about for some commitment to the human condition whose terrible depths had been so newly revealed\u201d.<\/p>\n <\/span>\u2018I couldn\u2019t take my eyes off that guy who was playing the piano\u2019 \u2026 Benjamin Britten in 1945.<\/span> Photograph: Alex Bender\/Getty Images<\/p>\n Britten rarely spoke of the experience, which he found, in many ways, to be \u201cterrifying\u201d. Peter Pears would report that he once admitted that the experience \u201ccoloured everything he had subsequently written\u201d. The view was shared by a biographer, who concluded that \u201cin each setting, Britten sublimated every word he would never speak about Belsen\u201d.<\/p>\n Not long after his return from Belsen, Britten embarked on the composition of The Rape of Lucretia, with a libretto by his friend Ronald Duncan. The opera concludes with an Epilogue (written on a train from London to Bath, according to Duncan, so I am not alone in finding the inspiration to write on such journeys), a lament by a Female Chorus:<\/p>\n double quotation markIs it all? Is all this suffering and pain \u201cIt is not all,\u201d the Male Chorus responds, with a note of hope.<\/p>\n The words evoked Robert Jackson\u2019s opening arguments at the famous Nuremberg trial, where new crimes \u2013 genocide, crimes against humanity, aggression \u2013 were first aired, and which I wrote about in East West Street. \u201cCivilization asks whether law is so laggard as to be utterly helpless to deal with crimes of this magnitude by criminals of this order of importance,\u201d Jackson said to the judges. \u201cIt does not expect that you can make war impossible. It does expect that your juridical action will put the forces of international law, its precepts, its prohibitions and, most of all, its sanctions, on the side of peace, so that men and women of good will in all countries may have \u2018leave to live by no man\u2019s leave, underneath the law\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/span>\u2018Can we attain nothing \/ but wider oceans of our own tears?\u2019 \u2026 Claudia Huckle as Lucretia in Glyndebourne festival\u2019s 2013 touring staging of Britten\u2019s The Rape of Lucretia.<\/span> Photograph: Tristram Kenton\/the Guardian<\/p>\n Still, no one should be starry-eyed about law and legal process.<\/p>\n Six months after being liberated, Anita Lasker was still at Belsen, working as an interpreter. She appeared as a witness at the trial of the Auschwitz commandant, an experience that still seared.<\/p>\n \u201cThe trial struck me as a huge farce,\u201d she wrote in her memoir, Inherit the Truth. She came face-to-face with \u201cBritish justice\u201d and the idea that \u201cyou are innocent unless proven guilty\u201d. This was a \u201ccommendable principle\u201d, but how could it be applied to crimes that were \u201cincomprehensible to the rest of the world\u201d, in legal proceedings that offered an impression of performance, like \u201coverblown theatre\u201d?<\/p>\n The experience left her sceptical, and we talked about this when I met her, not long after she celebrated her 100th birthday. Of course, the trial allowed \u201cbarristers to display their ability\u201d, but for those who\u2019d been on the receiving end of a \u201cmurder machine\u201d, the experience was \u201csick-making\u201d and left \u201ca bitter aftertaste\u201d.<\/p>\n The cellist asked: \u201cIs it possible to apply law in the conventional sense to crimes so far removed from the law as the massacre of millions of people, which were perpetrated in the cause of \u2018purifying the human race\u2019?\u201d<\/p>\n <\/span>\u2018Music cannot be destroyed\u2019 \u2026 Anita Lasker-Wallfisch in 2015.<\/span> Photograph: David Levene\/the Guardian<\/p>\n The question is a decent one, and Lasker-Wallfisch is not alone in having raised it. I often ask myself the same question, not least last January in The Hague, where I was appearing in a case on genocide before the International Court of Justice, where we heard searing, terrible accounts from members of the Rohingya community, of killings, rape and the murder of children.<\/p>\n Such themes motivated Britten. In 1968, he decided to set to music Bertolt Brecht\u2019s poem Kinderkreuzzug, written in 1941, about a group of children who become orphans following the outbreak of the war in Poland. Seeking assistance on a translation in English, to mark the 50th anniversary of Save the Children, he turned to his friend Hans Keller (to whom he later dedicated his last completed instrumental work, the Quartet No 3 in G, Op 94).<\/p>\n Brecht\u2019s verses \u2013 and Britten\u2019s score \u2013 evoke the futility of war, and the limits of legal process, as here in Keller\u2019s translation of Children\u2019s Crusade:<\/p>\n double quotation markThen there was a war, Like the lawyer in East West Street, Hersch Lauterpacht, Keller often listened to music at his home in Willow Road, Hampstead, which Britten visited. Curiously, I now live in that house, which Keller shared with Milein Cosman, his wife, an artist whose drawings of musicians, including Britten (and his parrot) and Menuhin, brought renown.<\/p>\n For Menuhin, performing at Belsen with Britten was \u201clike a ray of light in the darkness \u2026 because music is liberation\u201d.<\/p>\n For Anita Lasker-Wallfisch, whose life was saved simply because she played the cello, music \u201ccannot be destroyed\u201d, even when appropriated by malign forces.<\/p>\n And for me, when things seem tough, as in The Hague last January, I draw strength listening to Anthem, a song by the Canadian poet Leonard Cohen, who was a student of law: \u201cThere is a crack in everything \/ that\u2019s how the light gets in.\u201d<\/p>\n Philippe Sands is professor of law at UCL and a practising barrister. This is an edited version of an essay in the Aldeburgh festival programme book. A 10th anniversary updated edition of East West Street is out now. The Aldeburgh festival is on until 28 June.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In 1945, the violinist Yehudi Menuhin was on a short tour of Germany, offering recitals to survivors of the concentration camps. On Friday 27 July 1945 he reached Bergen-Belsen, liberated three months earlier, and gave two concerts, in the cinema at the camp. The experience had a profound impact. \u201cI shall not forget that afternoon<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":50590,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56],"tags":[24835,1281,24834,9135,686,1126],"class_list":{"0":"post-50589","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-crime-justice","8":"tag-britten","9":"tag-classical","10":"tag-coloured","11":"tag-experience","12":"tag-music","13":"tag-write"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=50589"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50589\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/50590"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=50589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=50589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=50589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
is this in vain?
Does this old world grow old
in sin alone?
Can we attain nothing
but wider oceans of our own tears?\u2019<\/p>\n
War against some other children on the run;
And the war just simply ended:
Sense had it none.
And then there was a trial,
On either side burned a candle.
What an embarrassing affair!
The judge condemned! What a scandal!<\/p>\n