\n<\/p>\n
A total overhaul of the special educational needs and disabilities (Send<\/strong>) system is due to be unveiled on Monday in a schools white paper that could face major opposition from Labour MPs.<\/p>\n The changes will raise the bar at which children in England qualify for an education, health and care plan (EHCP<\/strong>), which legally entitles children with Send to get support. EHCPs will be reserved for children with the most severe and complex needs<\/strong>, but new plans for children on lower tiers will still confer additional support and legal rights.<\/p>\n Parents would have legal avenues for appeals<\/strong> under existing equalities legislation and through the tribunal, said sources with knowledge of the proposed new system.<\/p>\n <\/span>Critics of the current system say lopsided funding mechanisms leave hundreds of thousands of children with little or no support in mainstream schools.<\/span> Photograph: Ben Birchall\/PA<\/p>\n The Send system overhaul is seen as the most high-stakes policy change<\/strong> the government has taken on since welfare, when plans had to be abandoned after a Labour backbench rebellion. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, has been leading a year-long lobbying offensive of hundreds of MPs, with many expressing support and recognition that the system has to change.<\/p>\n But some in government are worried that Labour MPs could vote the plans down in the next parliamentary session if MPs are bombarded with opposition from parents.<\/p>\n Phillipson has said children with Send would \u201calways have a legal right to support\u201d, and Labour would \u201cnot just protect but improve that support\u201d. Sources said the old system was broken and, if legislation is successful, those children currently in year 2 with an EHCP would be assessed by schools to decide if they need to remain on a EHCP or their needs could be met \u201cin a more flexible way\u201d. You can read the full story by my colleagues, Alexandra Topping <\/em>and <\/em>Richard Adams, <\/strong>here:<\/p>\n Share<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Key events<\/p>\n <\/span>Show key events only<\/p>\n Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Searches are expected to continue today at Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor\u2019s previous home \u2013 Royal Lodge, in Windsor \u2013 as calls grow for a probe into the former prince\u2019s links with Jeffrey Epstein.<\/p>\n Lucy Hough speaks to the Guardian\u2019s police and crime correspondent, Vikram Dodd, about what could be next for Andrew here:<\/em><\/p>\n <\/span>Andrew under investigation: what’s next for the former prince? – The Latest<\/span>Share<\/p>\n Reform UK\u2019s new economy spokesperson, Robert Jenrick<\/strong>, said his party would support legislation to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from the line of succession.<\/p>\n Speaking to Sky News, Jenrick, who left the Conservative frontbench last month, said:<\/p>\n double quotation markIf the government bring forward this bill with the support of the King then we will back it. We have to be realistic. Andrew is the eighth in line to the throne, so there\u2019s no chance of him becoming our monarch.<\/em><\/p>\n And so parliament really should be focused on things that are of more importance to the public, whether that\u2019s the economy, crime, the health service, immigration. But if the bill does come before parliament, then we\u2019ll support it.<\/em><\/p>\n My main feeling today\u2026 emotion is sadness, really for the King and the royal family because they\u2019ve been let down so badly as, of course, have the victims of Jeffrey Epstein.<\/em><\/p>\n The King serves this country extremely well and Andrew has disgraced the royal family, and he\u2019s disgraced our country in the process. And whatever happens, whether he\u2019s ultimately prosecuted or not, he should now just go off, lead a private life and allow<\/em> the King and the rest of the royal family to continue doing the good job that they do do for us.<\/em><\/p>\n Share<\/p>\n Updated at\u00a006.12 EST<\/p>\n Trevor Phillips then asks Bridget Phillipson if the government would be open to an \u201cindependent, judge-led inquiry\u201d.<\/p>\n The education secretary said:<\/p>\n double quotation markWe\u2019ll look at any sensible proposals that do come forward. But it\u2019s premature at the moment because we do have the police doing their work.<\/em><\/p>\n They need to have the time and space to do so. As the king set out, no one is above the law, and it\u2019s right that the police go wherever the evidence takes them. So that has to be the focus at the moment.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/span>Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor leaving Aylsham police station on the day he was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office.<\/span> Photograph: Phil Noble\/Reuters<\/p>\n King Charles said on Thursday that \u201cthe law must take its course\u201d after detectives took the unprecedented step of arresting his brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor on suspicion of misconduct in public office.<\/p>\n \u201cWhat now follows is the full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities,\u201d Charles said in a statement. \u201cIn this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and cooperation.\u201d Andrew has denied any wrongdoing.<\/p>\n Share<\/p>\n The government is considering introducing legislation to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor<\/strong>, King Charles\u2019s brother, <\/strong>from the line of royal succession.<\/p>\n Andrew was arrested on Thursday on suspicion of misconduct in public office. Police took him to Aylsham police station in Norfolk for questioning about allegations he shared confidential material with the convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.<\/p>\n Despite being stripped of his title last year, Andrew is still eighth in line to the throne and an act of parliament would be required to remove him and prevent him from ever becoming king.<\/p>\n Asked by Sky News\u2019 Trevor Phillips when the public can expect to see draft legislation excluding Andrew from the line of succession,<\/em> the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson,<\/strong> <\/em>said:<\/em><\/p>\n double quotation markSo we\u2019re not ruling anything out around this. But we have obviously got a live police investigation under way, so we\u2019ll not be setting out further steps until the police have been able to do their work. And wherever that investigation, wherever the evidence takes them.<\/em><\/p>\n Asked if the government is advising King Charles to remove Andrew from the privy council, she said:<\/p>\n double quotation markSo we\u2019ve said that we have to keep all of these options available to us, but you\u2019ll appreciate that because we have a live police investigation under way it\u2019s right that the police are allowed to do their job. Once that is concluded, then of course we\u2019ll consider in discussion with the royal family, with the King what further action is needed.<\/em><\/p>\n But I do just think as well, in all of this, we really shouldn\u2019t lose sight of where this began. And where this began was with young women and girls being exploited over an extended period of time by a network of very powerful men. And we can\u2019t ever forget that.<\/em><\/p>\n Share<\/p>\n The shadow education secretary, Laura Trott<\/strong>, told the BBC that the Conservatives would oppose any special educational needs (Send) support being withdrawn after children\u2019s needs are reviewed.<\/p>\n Trott said:<\/p>\n double quotation markI think that we want to be really constructive where it comes to this. But I do have some big concerns<\/strong> about what is being floated. Obviously, we\u2019ll see the detail tomorrow. But for too many parents \u2026 they\u2019ve had to fight for the support and the idea that they\u2019re going to be reassessed will be genuinely frightening. And I do worry about that \u2026<\/em><\/p>\n It has <\/strong>been way too hard for many parents to get that support<\/strong>. But once<\/em> that support is in place for many young people that has actually been very effective. So it\u2019s important that that is not taken away. <\/em><\/p>\n And the stress<\/strong> that this system has meant for so many parents up and down the country, they\u2019ve been worried for about a year now because there was a leak that EHCP\u2019s were going to be taken away. Now we\u2019ve got the education secretary on here saying that they might be reviewed. I mean, it\u2019s just too much for parents. They need to just take away this anxiety. And we would absolutely oppose any support being withdrawn.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/span>Laura Trott said the Conservatives would \u201cabsolutely oppose any support being withdrawn\u201d for children with Send. <\/span> Photograph: Jeff Overs\/BBC\/PA<\/p>\n As we have been reporting, one of the key pillars of the government\u2019s school reforms will be reducing the reliance of children with Send on education, health and care plans (EHCP), which are legal documents that enshrine support for children and young adults up to the age of 25. Councils and charities that provide Send support are struggling with staffing and funding as demand has spiralled upwards.<\/p>\n The provision across the country is extremely patchy, with some parents having to battle local authorities through protracted tribunals to get the right support for their child\u2019s needs. Some have voiced fears about plans to test those who hold ECHPs according to tougher criteria when they move up to secondary school.<\/p>\n Share<\/p>\n A total overhaul of the special educational needs and disabilities (Send<\/strong>) system is due to be unveiled on Monday in a schools white paper that could face major opposition from Labour MPs.<\/p>\n The changes will raise the bar at which children in England qualify for an education, health and care plan (EHCP<\/strong>), which legally entitles children with Send to get support. EHCPs will be reserved for children with the most severe and complex needs<\/strong>, but new plans for children on lower tiers will still confer additional support and legal rights.<\/p>\n Parents would have legal avenues for appeals<\/strong> under existing equalities legislation and through the tribunal, said sources with knowledge of the proposed new system.<\/p>\n <\/span>Critics of the current system say lopsided funding mechanisms leave hundreds of thousands of children with little or no support in mainstream schools.<\/span> Photograph: Ben Birchall\/PA<\/p>\n The Send system overhaul is seen as the most high-stakes policy change<\/strong> the government has taken on since welfare, when plans had to be abandoned after a Labour backbench rebellion. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, has been leading a year-long lobbying offensive of hundreds of MPs, with many expressing support and recognition that the system has to change.<\/p>\n But some in government are worried that Labour MPs could vote the plans down in the next parliamentary session if MPs are bombarded with opposition from parents.<\/p>\n Phillipson has said children with Send would \u201calways have a legal right to support\u201d, and Labour would \u201cnot just protect but improve that support\u201d. Sources said the old system was broken and, if legislation is successful, those children currently in year 2 with an EHCP would be assessed by schools to decide if they need to remain on a EHCP or their needs could be met \u201cin a more flexible way\u201d. You can read the full story by my colleagues, Alexandra Topping <\/em>and <\/em>Richard Adams, <\/strong>here:<\/p>\n Share<\/p>\n Speaking to the BBC\u2019s Laura Kuenssberg on her Sunday politics programme, the education secretary Bridget Phillipson<\/strong> claimed that Send reforms will \u201ctransform support for children and families\u201d.<\/p>\n Phillipson was pressed over whether any child who currently receives support will lose it under the reforms due to be set out in the white paper tomorrow morning (see opening post for more details).<\/p>\n \u201c<\/strong>We are not going to be taking away effective<\/strong> support from children, and what I\u2019ll be setting out tomorrow is a decade long, very careful transition from the system that we have, which everyone recognises isn\u2019t working.\u201d<\/p>\n Kuenssberg questioned the term \u201ceffective support\u201d, pointing out that this isn\u2019t the same as saying no child who receives support won\u2019t lose it under the government reforms, something many parents fear. Phillipson said:<\/p>\n double quotation markChildren will be reviewed<\/strong> in terms of their needs assessed. That should be happening at the moment. We\u2019re meant to have a system where every year an EHCP is reviewed. That doesn\u2019t always happen, and where it does, it doesn\u2019t always work well.<\/em><\/p>\n But what parents will see when we set out our vision tomorrow is a system where if, for example, your child needs speech and language support, the school will be better able to provide that than is the case right now.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/span>Bridget Phillipson told the BBC that Send reforms will \u201ctransform support for children and families\u201d.<\/span> Photograph: Jeff Overs\/BBC\/PAShare<\/p>\n Updated at\u00a005.08 EST<\/p>\n The education secretary is asked about the growing anger of the cost of student loans which has escalated since the chancellor\u2019s decision last November to freeze the salary threshold for \u201cplan 2\u201d student loan repayments for three years.<\/p>\n Rachel Reeves said the salary at which plan 2 student loans must be paid back would be frozen at \u00a329,385 for three years starting from next April. It means borrowers will have to pay even more towards their student loans as they benefit from pay rises.<\/p>\n Plan 2 loans were taken out by students from England who started university between September 2012 and July 2023, and students from Wales who have started since September 2012. Graduates have to repay 9% of everything they earn over a threshold \u2013 now \u00a328,470 a year.<\/p>\n Interest on the loans is charged at the rate of RPI inflation plus up to 3%, depending on how much a graduate earns. The Tories, which introduced the loans in the coalition government, have now promised to limit the rate on the loans to the retail price index (RPI) in a move that will heap further pressure on the Treasury.<\/p>\n Asked on Sky News how she will help loan 2 graduates saddled with huge amounts of debts, Phillipson said:<\/p>\n double quotation markNow I get the problem. I see the issue. In reality, as a government, you have to look at a question of priorities and what you can do and how fast you can do it. Given the shape of what we have in the public finances, this is really hard.<\/em><\/p>\n Phillipson said she is bringing in maintenance grants for less well-off students. \u201cThe threshold for repayment is going up this year. It will then, in future years, be frozen.\u201d<\/p>\n Share<\/p>\n Updated at\u00a005.11 EST<\/p>\n Bridget Phillipson is asked about the government\u2019s school reforms, namely around those concerning children with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) in England.<\/p>\n Trevor Phillips points out to her that there are 1.7 million children with special educational needs, nearly 500,000 of whom are school pupils. He says the proportion of children with education, health and care (EHCP) plans \u2013 which identify a child\u2019s needs and set out the support they should receive \u2013 has been increasing. He asks why this may be and Phillipson replies:<\/p>\n double quotation markPart of what we\u2019ve seen is that support for children with Send has been treated almost as an entirely separate issue, rather than it being integral to our school system. Lots of children at some point during their school lives will experience some form of challenge, will need extra support.<\/em><\/p>\n But the system that we have at the moment\u2026 is one that has made it the case that in order to get the support that children need, parents have to fight really hard to get that education, health and care plan. I\u2019ve heard from so many parents just how difficult, how devastating that has been. It can take years. It\u2019s really adversarial.<\/em><\/p>\n Pressed by Trevor Phillips if the government is promising that an EHCP determination will be delivered within weeks, not months or years, Phillipson said:<\/p>\n double quotation markYes. We will make sure that children get support much, much more quickly than is the case right now. And the commitment that I give to parents is that when they see all of the documents published tomorrow what they will see is a government that is focused on delivering better outcomes for their children. I am fiercely ambitious for every child in our country.<\/em><\/p>\n Phillipson later confirmed it will become \u201ca question of weeks, not a question of months and years\u201d. Many EHCPS are issued by local authorities beyond the 20 week deadline.<\/p>\n Share<\/p>\n Updated at\u00a004.34 EST<\/p>\n Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of UK politics. The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson<\/strong>, will be speaking to the BBC and Sky News shortly and will likely be asked about government plans to halve the attainment gap between the poorest pupils in England and their more affluent peers.<\/p>\n The schools white paper<\/strong>, set to be published in full tomorrow, will set a target to halve the disadvantage gap by the time children born in this parliament finish secondary school.<\/p>\n It will detail proposals to change the criteria under which schools receive funding to support the most disadvantaged students, and will set out two new programmes to tackle performance of disadvantaged pupils locally in the North East and on the coast.<\/p>\n <\/span>The new schools white paper is expected to be published in full on Monday morning.<\/span> Photograph: lovethephoto\/Alamy<\/p>\n In the latest GCSE results, the disadvantage gap index for year 11s stood at 3.92, according to the Department for Education (DfE).<\/p>\n It had previously narrowed from 4.07 in 2011 to a low of 3.66 in 2019\/20 with some small fluctuations in between. It then widened again post-pandemic to the highest it had been in a decade at 3.94 in 2022\/23.<\/p>\n Phillipson, a Sunderland MP who grew up in the north-east, said the reforms will help end the \u201cone-size-fits-all system\u201d and present a \u201cgolden opportunity to cut the link between background and success\u201d.<\/p>\n The schools white paper will also reportedly set out proposals to transform the special educational needs and disabilities (Send<\/strong>) system, in what could be one of the defining policy challenges of Keir Starmer\u2019s fragile administration.<\/p>\n Children with a legal right to special needs support will face a review when they move to secondary school, my colleagues Alexandra Topping and <\/strong><\/em>Richard Adams report.<\/p>\n The reforms will raise the bar at which children in England qualify for an education, health and care plan (EHCP), which legally entitles children with Send to get support.<\/p>\n Share<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" What send reforms are expected to be brought in by the government – and will Labour MPs back it? A total overhaul of the special educational needs and disabilities (Send) system is due to be unveiled on Monday in a schools white paper that could face major opposition from Labour MPs. The changes will raise<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":44970,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[20789,2280,2159,132,321,480,124,1437,583,1533],"class_list":{"0":"post-44969","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-education","8":"tag-affluent","9":"tag-gap","10":"tag-lay","11":"tag-live","12":"tag-ministers","13":"tag-plans","14":"tag-politics","15":"tag-poorest","16":"tag-pupils","17":"tag-reduce"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=44969"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44969\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/44970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=44969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=44969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=44969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Reform supports removing Andrew from line of succession if bill is brought forward, Jenrick says<\/h2>\n
‘No one is above the law’, education secretary says<\/h2>\n
Ministers ‘not ruling anything out’ on Andrew, education secretary says<\/h2>\n
Parents find prospect of reassessment of educational support ‘genuinely frightening’, shadow education secretary says<\/h2>\n
What send reforms are expected to be brought in by the government – and will Labour MPs back it?<\/h2>\n
Parents will get educational support for their child within ‘weeks’, not months or years, education secretary says<\/h2>\n
Education secretary to face questions as government sets out plans to halve attainment gap in England\u2019s schools<\/h2>\n