\n<\/p>\n
January 29, 2026<\/p>\n
3 min read<\/p>\n
Add Us On Google<\/span>Add SciAm<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n How long you live may depend much more on your genes than scientists thought<\/p>\n A new analysis suggests that genes play a much larger role in human longevity than previously believed. But lifestyle factors still matter<\/p>\n By Cody Cottier edited by Tanya Lewis<\/span><\/p>\n Amr Bo Shanab\/Getty Images<\/p>\n Three decades ago a famous study of Danish twins found that our genes \u201conly moderately\u201d influence how long we\u2019re likely to live. Longevity, the authors estimated, was about 25 percent heritable, meaning the remaining three quarters was determined by environmental factors and lifestyle choices, such as diet and exercise. Most subsequent studies found heritability to be somewhere in the 20 to 25 percent range, and 25 percent is now widely accepted. But a new study more than doubles it, suggesting lifespan may be more genetically fixed than we thought.<\/p>\n The study, which was published today in Science, arrives at this dramatic increase by reframing how scientists think about longevity. Rather than lumping all deaths together, the researchers distinguish between two kinds: \u201cintrinsic mortality\u201d comes from built-in biological aging processes and genetic mutations, whereas \u201cextrinsic mortality\u201d comes from outside causes, such as accidents and infection. Early longevity studies analyzed groups of people who were born in a time of widespread extrinsic mortality. That skewed previous estimates of heritability, says Uri Alon, a systems biologist at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, and senior author of the new paper.<\/p>\n To sort out the effects of intrinsic versus extrinsic deaths on longevity heritability, he and his colleagues ran computer simulations of human mortality, calibrated using data from those previous twin studies. When they dialed extrinsic mortality down to zero, leaving only deaths caused by intrinsic aging processes, lifespan heritability roughly doubled. Surprised, the team performed a sanity check\u2014the researchers calculated heritability in the traditional way for twins born between 1900 and 1935, an era when rapid medical advances steadily curtailed premature death. From one generation to the next, Alon says, \u201cthey have lower and lower extrinsic mortality, and we see that their heritability goes up and up.\u201d Taken together, the results indicate that intrinsic lifespan\u2014how long a person lives if they don\u2019t die of an external cause\u2014is about 55 percent heritable.<\/p>\n If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.<\/p>\n Kaare Christensen, an epidemiologist and professor at the University of Southern Denmark\u2019s Danish Twin Research Center, who was not involved in the study, calls it \u201can interesting mathematical exercise\u201d but notes that \u201cin the real world, people die from both kinds of death.\u201d There\u2019s no actual discrepancy between the two heritability estimates, 25 and 55 percent, he says, because they\u2019re measuring different things. Considering extrinsic mortality has declined so much in the past century, however, Alon argues that \u201cthe higher number is more relevant\u201d for people born today. In reality, except for the most clear-cut cases of genetic causes (such as a genetic disease) or environmental ones (such as a lightning strike), it\u2019s hard to separate extrinsic and intrinsic factors.<\/p>\n Whether or not the new estimate offers a more realistic picture of lifespan heritability, it highlights the importance of genetics in extending lives, says Sofiya Milman, a scientists who studies aging and longevity at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She\u2019s one of many researchers who are trying to understand how centenarians\u2019 unique biology protects them from age-related disease. \u201cWe\u2019re hoping to create therapies that will mimic those intrinsic factors,\u201d Milman says, \u201cand make them accessible to people who didn\u2019t win the genetic lottery.\u201d<\/p>\n Most of us are unlikely to break 100 without the right set of genes\u2014or at least drugs designed to replicate their beneficial effects. Until such treatments become available, though, a healthy lifestyle remains the best path to living longer. Even if exercise, sleep and a balanced diet only contribute 45 percent to lifespan, evidence shows they can still add 10 years or more to a person\u2019s life. \u201cThose things will be helpful,\u201d Milman says, \u201cirrespective of your genetic makeup.”<\/p>\n If you enjoyed this article, I\u2019d like to ask for your support. Scientific American<\/span> has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve been a Scientific American<\/span> subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm <\/span>always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.<\/p>\n If you subscribe to Scientific American<\/span>, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.<\/p>\n In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.<\/p>\n There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you\u2019ll support us in that mission.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" January 29, 2026 3 min read Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm How long you live may depend much more on your genes than scientists thought A new analysis suggests that genes play a much larger role in human longevity than previously believed. But lifestyle factors still matter By Cody Cottier edited by Tanya Lewis Amr<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":43168,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[2911,8024,132,3483,384,445],"class_list":{"0":"post-43167","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-depend","9":"tag-genes","10":"tag-live","11":"tag-long","12":"tag-scientists","13":"tag-thought"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43167","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=43167"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43167\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/43168"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=43167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=43167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=43167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}On supporting science journalism<\/h2>\n
It\u2019s Time to Stand Up for Science<\/h2>\n