\n<\/p>\n
The U.N. climate conference opening this week was planned as the moment that each country would increase its ambition to meet the 2015 Paris Agreement target of limiting global average temperature rise to well below 2 degrees C. As delegates assemble for COP30 in Bel\u00e9m, on the edge of Brazil\u2019s rainforest, the United States, a major player in the creation of that agreement, is leading an aggressive domestic and international campaign to obstruct further climate action.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
China, meanwhile, still the world\u2019s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases by volume and once the pariah of climate ambition, is staking its claim to leadership, both as the steady and reliable partner in the global energy transition and the primary purveyor of the means to achieve it. \u00a0<\/p>\n
COP30 in Bel\u00e9m may well be remembered as the moment that the world accepted the leading role of China in addressing humanity\u2019s most important challenge. \u00a0<\/p>\n
The\u00a0behavior of the U.S. delegation at a recent meeting in London to finalize an agreement on limiting emissions from maritime traffic is a further warning to delegates in Bel\u00e9m. U.S.\u00a0threats to other delegations in London reportedly succeeded in stalling the formal acceptance of a global treaty that had already been agreed, after 10 hard years of effort. COP30 is billed as a meeting that aims to focus on implementation rather than negotiation, but similar U.S. interventions could still slow the global effort, just as science is warning that it needs to accelerate.\u00a0<\/p>\n
When the U.S. withdrew from the Paris Agreement, China\u2019s position as the global supplier of low-carbon goods was unassailable.<\/p>\n
In September, President Donald Trump told the U.N. General Assembly that climate change was a \u201ccon job.\u201d The next day, China\u2019s premier, Li Qiang, announced an emissions reduction target of 7 to 10 percent from an undefined \u201cpeak level\u201d by 2035. The target falls far short of the Paris Agreement and is much less than China is already doing, but when the E.U.\u2019s climate chief expressed his disappointment in the level of China\u2019s ambition, China\u00a0hit back.<\/p>\n
Subscribe to the E360 Newsletter for weekly updates delivered to your inbox. Sign Up.<\/p>\n
\u201cSome people turn a deaf ear and remain silent when hearing claims like \u2018climate change is a hoax,\u2019 but instead ignore and make irresponsible comments about China\u2019s responsible and proactive actions to address climate change,\u201d a Foreign Ministry spokesperson said in a written response.\u00a0<\/p>\n
For China, the target was a demonstration of its commitment to multilateral climate action and a further element in a claim to leadership that can no longer be dismissed. It was also a demonstration of the well-known Chinese preference to set low targets and meet them early, rather than failing to meet a more demanding promise.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Since the adoption of the first U.N. climate agreement in 1992, the countries of the European Union have played a leading role in shaping and driving global climate policy, but now the E.U. is beset by internal problems. Its primary industrial economy, Germany, is suffering from Chinese competition, and with the rise of right-wing parties, resistance has emerged to the ambitious climate policies of the European Commission. One symptom of these internal troubles was the E.U.\u2019s embarrassing failure to agree its own mitigation targets before the informal deadline of September 30.\u00a0<\/p>\n
An EV factory in Jinhua, China.<\/span> There are many ways to judge climate leadership: They include the quality and consistency of policy, the speed and effectiveness of carbon reduction, and the role a country plays in the global effort, including in support to less developed countries. China\u2019s record on mitigation and international support is mixed at best, but its claim to leadership today has benefited from the actions of the U.S., the distraction of the E.U., and China\u2019s own long-term, consistent, all-of-government approach.<\/p>\n When Trump returned to the White House in 2025, China had long been preparing for what it saw as an inevitable geopolitical confrontation with the U.S., a standoff in which climate is now an arena of ideological competition rather than cooperation. When China became the biggest carbon emitter by volume in 2005, its leadership did not contest the science. Importantly, they understood climate change as a severe threat but also as an enormous industrial opportunity. If the world needed to transition away from fossil fuels and towards clean energy, China resolved to be the supplier of the enabling goods and technologies. \u00a0<\/p>\n China aligned its policies and industrial strategy accordingly: It slowly developed domestic policies to support its own mitigation and, critically, upgraded its economy by investing in the full range of technologies and supply chains that would be needed to achieve a global energy transition. \u00a0<\/p>\n China is helping enable the energy transition, while the U.S. tries to force countries to buy U.S. oil and gas. Global trends favor China.<\/p>\n When the U.S. withdrew from the Paris Agreement for the second time, China\u2019s position as the global supplier of low-carbon goods was all but unassailable. Last year, the country that carried much of the blame for the failure of 2009\u2019s COP15 in Copenhagen, installed more renewable energy capacity than the rest of the world combined.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n China today produces about\u00a080 percent\u00a0of all solar panels and more than\u00a070 percent of all electric vehicles. It has also \u2014 by dint of subsidies, efficiencies, and economies of scale \u2014 brought down the cost of\u00a0solar panels by almost 90 percent,\u00a0reducing the overall capital expenditure costs for renewable projects by 70 percent, thus lowering, if not removing, the cost barrier to the energy transition for the rest of the world. China\u2019s overwhelming industrial capacity in clean technologies now threatens what remains of similar capacity in other nations.<\/p>\n China\u2019s ambitions go well beyond its own borders. The country that was once the biggest promoter of overseas coal projects announced an end to that policy in 2021 with a speech by Xi Jinping to the United Nations. He also promised to help developing countries with their energy transition. Since then, China has turned to clean technology exports and, perhaps in anticipation of future barriers to trade, to building\u00a0clean energy factories\u00a0abroad, investing in clean technologies in 54 countries since 2022.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n Share of solar cell, wind nacelle, and battery cell manufacturing capacity in 2023. Source: IEA.<\/span> In August, at the summit of the enlarged Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, the Eurasian intergovernmental security organization, China again committed to working with other SCO members to expand their renewable energy capacity, and \u201cmajor platforms\u201d for China-SCO cooperation on energy and green industry\u00a0were also\u00a0announced. As President Xi told delegates to the U.N. Secretary General\u2019s climate summit in September, \u201cGreen and low carbon transition is the trend of our time.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n The United States, meanwhile, is\u00a0trying to force its partner countries to buy more U.S. oil and\u00a0gas.\u00a0Of the two approaches, global trends favor China. In its latest\u00a0forecast, the International Energy Agency predicts that the world\u2019s renewable electricity generation will climb to over 17,000\u00a0terawatt-hours by 2030, an increase of almost 90 percent from 2023.\u00a0<\/p>\n With the U.S. actively hostile to climate progress and the E.U. preoccupied with internal divisions and continuing Russian military aggression, climate diplomacy increasingly mirrors the world\u2019s geopolitical shifts. China\u2019s diplomacy among emerging economies has been built on its economic heft; in one recent sign of how far China has come, Xi Jinping was widely described as a \u201cpeer competitor\u201d in his meeting with Donald Trump in South Korea last month.\u00a0<\/p>\n China, India, and Brazil \u2014 which represent 40 percent of global emissions \u2014 could become the alliance driving U.N. climate diplomacy.<\/p>\n China has also invested years of effort in building alliances through a network of mini- and multi-lateral organizations. These include the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Forum for China Africa Cooperation, and, importantly for climate negotiations, the BASIC group, the coalition of Brazil, South Africa, India and China that came together in 2009 to promote their collective interests at the Copenhagen COP.<\/p>\n China\u2019s mega dam project poses big risks for Asia\u2019s Grand Canyon. Read more.<\/p>\n The BASIC group does not align on all issues: India and China are regional rivals, and their unresolved border disputes have regularly resulted in violent clashes. India has an ambitious solar program and is keen to develop its own industry rather than being dependent on China. But recent U.S. diplomatic moves, including high tariffs, Trump\u2019s claim to have resolved the dangerous clash between India and Pakistan in May, and his embrace in June of Pakistan\u2019s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, have pushed India towards China.\u00a0<\/p>\n At the BRICS summit in Tianjin this year, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping\u00a0referred\u00a0to each other as \u201cdevelopment partners, not rivals,\u201d and spoke of the need for \u201cmutual respect, mutual interest, and mutual sensitivity.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n The Benban Solar Energy Park in Aswan, Egypt. China helped finance the project as part of its Belt and Road Initiative.<\/span> On climate issues, the interests of the BASIC group align so closely that it seems likely that in the current vacuum of leadership from the rich world, China, India, and Brazil \u2014 which collectively represent some 40 percent of global emissions \u2014 could become the tripartite alliance that will drive U.N. climate diplomacy, as an\u00a0editorial in the South China Morning Post in October boldly claimed.\u00a0<\/p>\n Such a leadership shift would reinforce a trend in climate negotiations toward the interests and priorities of emerging economies that the BASIC group was formed to defend, including the insistence that developed economies must both lead the energy transition and support less developed countries to adapt and to build low-carbon economies.\u00a0<\/p>\n The three countries differ in approach and capacity: Brazil under President Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva positions itself as a moral leader, deploying the symbolism and global ecological importance of the Amazon; China\u2019s industrial and technological dominance effectively determines the cost and pace of the world\u2019s energy transition; and India articulates a justice-based claim centred on energy access, equity, and \u201ccommon but differentiated responsibilities.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Of the three, China is by far the biggest player in scale of emissions, diplomatic heft, and industrial capacity, and is the driver of the BASIC collaboration. It is also reshaping the world through its pursuit of low-carbon exports, bringing the possibility of global low-carbon development within reach and offering an alternative perspective to energy-hungry emerging economies.\u00a0<\/p>\n Beijing secured the supply and refining of rare earths, giving China a choke hold over supply chains essential for advanced technologies.<\/p>\n In one illustration of the trend, at a press conference in Beijing in April, COP30 President Andr\u00e9 Corr\u00eaa do Lago highlighted China\u2019s efforts in green development and the role that China\u2019s alliances play in shaping climate diplomacy. \u201cChina demonstrates that investing in climate action can bring excellent economic results and improve the lives of its population. This example is crucial for other countries,\u201d he said. \u201cWe are discussing climate issues within BRICS\u2026 We believe the global South has many of the most important answers to climate change.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n The stakes may be even bigger than the outcome from the negotiating rooms at COP30.\u00a0<\/p>\n In April 2017, Daniel Gardner, a professor of history at Smith College, published an\u00a0arresting article on the website of the Carnegie Corporation of New York, headlined \u201cThrough climate change denial, we\u2019re ceding global leadership to China.\u201d Donald Trump had announced that the U.S. was leaving the Paris Agreement for the first time, but the U.S. economy in nominal GDP terms was still\u00a0about\u00a01.6 times larger than China\u2019s, and the U.S. still maintained a convincing technological lead. China\u2019s rapid growth remained dependent on coal, a climate-damaging fuel that China continued to promote as part of its Belt and Road Initiative; its emissions were still climbing rapidly; and the country was not noted as the most cooperative in climate negotiations.\u00a0<\/p>\n Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Brazilian President Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula Da Silva, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, and Chinese President Xi Jinping clasp hands at a 2024 summit of world leaders in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.<\/span> But other trends that attracted less notice were having profound effect: China had all but wiped out the once-leading European solar industry; a subsidiary of a battery company in southern China was developing electric vehicles that would become the world\u2019s leading brand by 2023; 19 new nuclear power plants were under construction; and China was gaining ground in the wind turbine business. To support all this, Beijing had secured the supply and refining of rare earth minerals that others had relinquished to avoid pollution at home, ceding China a virtual choke hold over the supply chains that are essential for every advanced technology.\u00a0<\/p>\n Today, China\u2019s claim to leadership is hard to challenge. In September, historian Nils Gilman\u00a0published an\u00a0article in Foreign Policy that suggested the energy contest between the U.S. and China went far beyond climate politics. \u201cThe decarbonization agenda is not simply about reordering markets or industrial policies, but in fact represents\u00a0the crucible for a new geopolitical order,\u201d he wrote. \u00a0<\/p>\n How China became the world\u2019s leader on renewable energy. Read more.<\/p>\n Gilman\u2019s argument is that the battle over the substance of global energy is the center of what he calls a \u201cnew eco-ideological Cold War\u201d and that, like the last Cold War, this contest over how the world fuels its industrial economies will reshape global alliances. If Gilman is right, and decarbonization is the new geopolitical battleground, China remains confident that the U.S is courting marginalization and that it is China\u2019s leadership and alliances that will matter as the world slowly but irreversibly moves toward a low-carbon future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The U.N. climate conference opening this week was planned as the moment that each country would increase its ambition to meet the 2015 Paris Agreement target of limiting global average temperature rise to well below 2 degrees C. As delegates assemble for COP30 in Bel\u00e9m, on the edge of Brazil\u2019s rainforest, the United States, a<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":32822,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[2153,186,6318,2378,12858,2272,1167,811],"class_list":{"0":"post-32821","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-china","9":"tag-climate","10":"tag-e-u","11":"tag-leadership","12":"tag-retreat","13":"tag-role","14":"tag-takes","15":"tag-u-s"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32821","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32821"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32821\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/32822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n Hu Xiaofei \/ VCG via Getty Images<\/span><\/p>\n
\n Yale Environment 360<\/span><\/p>\n
\n Ahmed Gomaa \/ Xinhua via Getty Images<\/span><\/p>\n
\n Wagner Meier \/ Getty Images<\/span><\/p>\n