{"id":30756,"date":"2025-10-27T00:33:19","date_gmt":"2025-10-27T00:33:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/?p=30756"},"modified":"2025-10-27T00:33:19","modified_gmt":"2025-10-27T00:33:19","slug":"the-company-making-a-mockery-of-state-gambling-bans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/?p=30756","title":{"rendered":"The Company Making a Mockery of State Gambling Bans"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW ArticleParagraph_dropcap__uIVzg\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\" data-flatplan-dropcap=\"true\"><span class=\"smallcaps\">Americans who want <\/span>to bet on sports have many options. There\u2019s DraftKings, FanDuel, ESPN Bet, Caesars, and BetMGM. There\u2019s also BetRivers, Hard Rock, bet365, Fanatics, and Bally Bet. But none of those platforms are available in the 17 states where online sports betting remains illegal, including California and Texas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Kalshi, a prediction market, doesn\u2019t have that limitation. Gamblers can use it to wager on the outcome of sporting events in all 50 states. That\u2019s because, in the eyes of American law, Kalshi is not a gambling company at all; it\u2019s an exchange that facilitates the trading of legitimate financial products. Over the past year, the company has added sports to the range of events that can be wagered on, while arguing that it is beyond the reach of any state-level gambling ban. It maintains that it can be regulated only by the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission. But under the second Trump administration, the CFTC has shown no interest in cracking down. The result is that sports betting is now legal everywhere\u2014even in the states where it isn\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Futures contracts have been around in the United States since the late 1800s. Midwestern farmers planted and harvested grain at roughly the same time every year, and then everyone went to Chicago to sell. This sudden abundance of grain would cause prices to plummet. Middlemen swooped in to help. They\u2019d buy the grain and store it nearby, selling it for a profit in the winter. This helped to stabilize prices, but some buyers wanted more certainty: a set amount of grain at a set price at a set date, so they could plan ahead. Middlemen obliged, writing contracts for the future delivery of grain.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Soon after, people began trading the contracts. A bakery might buy a grain contract from a distillery. Farmers could buy the contracts, too, to hedge their bets: A Michigan farmer might buy a grain contract from a Wisconsin farmer, so that if Michigan had a bad harvest, he\u2019d still have some grain to sell. Speculators joined the party. If the cereal market was growing, a savvy market-watcher might notice, scooping up grain contracts that would be worth more later. That serves a useful economic function. Without these middlemen, the price of grain might stay artificially low for a long time, and then spike once everyone notices the growth. The speculator provides liquidity and, with it, stability.<\/p>\n<p id=\"injected-recirculation-link-0\" class=\"ArticleRelatedContentLink_root__VYc9V\" data-view-action=\"view link - injected link - item 1\" data-event-element=\"injected link\" data-event-position=\"1\">Keith O\u2019Brien: Sports can\u2019t survive prop bets<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">At some level, the speculator is gambling. \u201cAll you\u2019re doing is betting on whether the price of grain will go up or down,\u201d Karl Lockhart, a law professor who studies prediction markets, told me. As futures markets matured, states tried to step in, and politicians introduced anti-options bills. The federal government, however, intervened repeatedly to save the nascent industry. \u201cIt seems to us an extraordinary and unlikely proposition that the dealings which give its character to the great market for future sales in this country are to be regarded as mere wagers,\u201d Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. wrote in a 1905 decision.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">With the government\u2019s blessing, the futures market continued to evolve. People began trading currency futures in the \u201970s, betting on the fluctuations of the pound or the franc or the Mongolian tugrik. Soon after, markets were created allowing banks to buy and sell bets on future interest rates. The banks were hedging, much like the hypothetical Michigan farmer\u2014if interest rates went up, they\u2019d be hurt, so they would bet on interest rates going up, and then their losses wouldn\u2019t be so big. Other financial firms would take the other side of the bet. Were they gambling? Maybe, but they were also helping banks stay solvent.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Hedging opportunities are everywhere, and they don\u2019t always require a contract to buy or sell an underlying asset. In what\u2019s known as an event contract, a company might bet on a specific adverse development, such as its competitors merging. Kalshi, founded in 2018, specializes in event contracts, a category that it interprets very broadly. (The word <em>kalshi<\/em> means \u201ceverything\u201d in Arabic.) When Tarek Mansour, the company\u2019s CEO and one of its co-founders, was interning at Goldman Sachs in 2016, he told me, clients would ask the bank to design a way to hedge against Brexit or a Donald Trump presidency. (Imagine you run a company that makes offshore wind turbines, Trump\u2019s least favorite thing in the world. If you had bet on a Trump victory last year, you\u2019d be in better financial shape now.) Political betting was technically illegal, though the government tolerated it in small amounts, on sites run by academics and nonprofits for research purposes. Then, in 2023, Kalshi declared its intention to introduce political markets in which users could bet on which party would control Congress.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">The Biden-era CFTC decided Kalshi\u2019s political expansion was prohibited because it involved \u201cgaming and activity that is unlawful under state law\u201d and was \u201ccontrary to the public interest.\u201d Kalshi challenged the CFTC\u2019s order in federal court. The judge ruled in Kalshi\u2019s favor, reasoning that if betting on elections were to count as gambling, then so would betting on the weather, or a merger, or an earnings report, or interest rates. At issue, fundamentally, was where the line between gambling and investing really lies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW ArticleParagraph_dropcap__uIVzg\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\" data-flatplan-dropcap=\"true\"><span class=\"smallcaps\">The Biden CFTC<\/span> appealed the court\u2019s ruling. Kalshi, in its response to the appeal, tried to make the boundary between futures trades and gambling clearer. (After Trump took office, the CFTC would drop the appeal.) A bet is gambling only \u201cif it is contingent on a game or a game-related event,\u201d Kalshi\u2019s lawyers at Milbank and Jones Day argued in a filing last November. \u201cThe classic example is a contract on the outcome of a sporting event.\u201d Political betting isn\u2019t gambling, the argument went. Sports betting is gambling\u2014and that\u2019s not what Kalshi was offering its customers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Less than three months later, Kalshi announced that customers could bet on the Super Bowl. When I asked about this discrepancy, Mansour told me that the legal filing had been written by \u201coutside counsel\u201d and that what it expressed was \u201cnot our view.\u201d Today, Kalshi is mostly a sports-betting company, but one whose users can live anywhere and need to be at least 18 years old, rather than the typical 21. Since football season started, early last month, sports betting has accounted for more than 90 percent of the activity on the platform. A freshly signed licensing deal with the NHL allows Kalshi to use team logos and names instead of soliciting bets on \u201cNew York J at Cincinnati,\u201d as it still does for football.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Kalshi users can wager on more than just the outcome of a game. A football bettor, for example, could bet on the margin of victory, how many passing yards one of the quarterbacks will have, or how many rushing yards one of the running backs will have. They could even combine these three bets into a parlay, where the odds of winning are lower, but the payout for winning is higher. Kalshi calls this a \u201ccombo,\u201d perhaps to avoid using the no-no gambling term <em>parlay<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p id=\"injected-recirculation-link-1\" class=\"ArticleRelatedContentLink_root__VYc9V\" data-view-action=\"view link - injected link - item 2\" data-event-element=\"injected link\" data-event-position=\"2\">Charles Fain Lehman: Legalizing sports gambling was a huge mistake<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">The day after Kalshi rolled out its combos, the stock prices of DraftKings and FanDuel\u2019s parent company each fell more than 10 percent. Kalshi knows that investors and customers think of it as a gambling company; in fact, its advertising encourages them to. One Kalshi social-media ad announces \u201cBREAKING NEWS: SPORTS BETTING IN TEXAS IN NOW LEGAL\u201d and that \u201cKalshi has legalized sports betting in all 50 states.\u201d (When I asked Mansour about this kind of advertising, he said, \u201cThe minute we basically saw them, we basically took them down.\u201d This type of ad was first spotted in February, and Kalshi re-upped them as recently as last month.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Kalshi insists that it is not a sportsbook, but rather an exchange that matches buyers and sellers of legitimate event contracts. Some of the events just happen to be sports, rather than mergers. A sportsbook makes money when you lose, which puts its incentives directly at odds with the interests of the user. Kalshi, by contrast, makes its money from fees.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Even setting aside the formalism of the distinction, this argument is undermined by the fact that a subsidiary, Kalshi Trading, does take bets against customers. So does a partner, Susquehanna International Group, which provides a \u201cmarket making\u201d service for Kalshi by being on the other side of users\u2019 bets. The same goes for Kalshi\u2019s army of decentralized market makers who are compensated in return for providing \u201cliquidity\u201d to the market. All of these entities make money when ordinary users lose their bets.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Tim Ford is a sports bettor on Kalshi. He uses an algorithm to determine probabilities for game outcomes, then buys or sells contracts that deviate from those probabilities. He has made more than $100,000 over the past month this way, according to Kalshi\u2019s public leaderboard. (His handle is CSPTRADINGonX.) Ford, who lives in Texas, doesn\u2019t defend the morality of Kalshi\u2019s end run around the state\u2019s gambling laws. But without the company, he would be significantly poorer. \u201cAt the end of the day, they are certainly effective,\u201d he told me. Kalshi facilitates more than $900 million in bets a week, keeping a steep percentage in fees (more than 5 percent for a $20 bet). Earlier this month, it announced that it had raised more than $300 million at a $5 billion valuation; now investors are trying to get in at a $10 to $12 billion valuation. The personal-investing platform Robinhood has embedded Kalshi\u2019s prediction markets into its savings app.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">Kalshi\u2019s rise has not been without controversy. Last November, FBI agents raided the home of the CEO of Polymarket, Kalshi\u2019s biggest competitor. Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, was being investigated for allegedly allowing Americans to use its platform in violation of a settlement with the CFTC. (In July, the company said that the probe had been dropped, and the CFTC has since declared that it can legally operate.) Following the raid, two white Kalshi employees persuaded the retired NFL player Antonio Brown to tweet \u201cthis nigga seem guilty.\u201d (\u201cThis was a mistake,\u201d Mansour told me.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">If Kalshi\u2019s marketing can be disorganized, its legal strategy is not. To help navigate the regulatory environment, Kalshi employs Donald Trump Jr. as a strategic adviser, and has hired as its lawyer the Democratic superstar Neal Katyal, who has argued in front of the Supreme Court more than 50 times. The company argues that it\u2019s not subject to state gambling bans, because they are preempted by the presence of federal law regulating futures contracts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">That argument is being tested in court. In response to cease and desist letters, Kalshi sued Nevada, New Jersey, and Maryland in the spring, asking courts to prevent the states from cracking down on them. According to Andrew Kim, a lawyer who has been tracking the litigation, the company has since added Ohio to the list and has been sued by the state of Massachusetts, three Indian tribes in California as well as one in Wisconsin, and private plaintiffs in seven states. In at least two instances, Kalshi has won preliminary injunctions to allow it to keep operating while the cases proceed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">If states can\u2019t stop so-called prediction markets from facilitating sports betting, who can? According to Kalshi, no one besides the CFTC (or, in theory, Congress). The company classifies the transactions on its platform not as wagers but as \u201cswaps,\u201d which the post\u2013Great Recession Dodd-Frank financial reform law charges the CFTC with regulating. To qualify as a swap under the law, the event being bet on must be of \u201cpotential financial, economic, or commercial consequence.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">This requirement has led Kalshi to interesting places. Super Bowl bets must be swaps, Kalshi\u2019s lawyers argue, because the winning team generates additional revenue. Whether a player scores a touchdown in a particular game, Mansour told me, has economic consequences for the player\u2019s sponsorship deal. Even parlays have economic consequences, Mansour explained, because sportsbooks offer parlays and could use Kalshi to hedge by taking the other side of the bet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">If Kalshi\u2019s bets are swaps, then regulating them is the CFTC\u2019s job and no one else\u2019s. This is very convenient for Kalshi. Four of the five CFTC commissioners have resigned since January, and the last one remaining on the commission, which is bipartisan by law, is a Republican who announced she\u2019d leave as soon as Trump\u2019s pick for chair, Brian Quintenz, was confirmed. Quintenz, a former CFTC commissioner, is on the board of Kalshi.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW ArticleParagraph_dropcap__uIVzg\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\" data-flatplan-dropcap=\"true\"><span class=\"smallcaps\">On September 30, <\/span>the eve of the government shutdown, there was finally some action. Six senators posted an open letter to the acting chair of the CFTC asking her to stop allowing sports-prediction markets. Trump pulled his nomination of Quintenz after the Winklevoss brothers told him that Quintenz would be too hard on crypto. And CFTC staff issued their first guidance on sports-prediction markets. In a letter to all approved exchanges, they wrote that they \u201care aware that certain registered entities and registrants are listing or facilitating the trading or clearing of sports-related event contracts, or may be interested in the future in doing so.\u201d Their advice? \u201cState regulatory actions and pending and potential litigation, including enforcement actions, should be accounted for with appropriate contingency planning, disclosures, and risk management policies and procedures.\u201d The letter perfectly closed the buck-passing loop. States had tried to regulate sports-prediction markets. The courts had suggested that responsibility belongs to the federal government. Now the federal government was telling the sports-prediction markets to beware of the states and the courts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleParagraph_root__4mszW\" data-flatplan-paragraph=\"true\">For now, the industry, its investors, and its gamblers are in limbo. If they\u2019d like to hedge, Polymarket is taking bets on whether the Supreme Court will accept a case on sports-event contracts by July 2026.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Americans who want to bet on sports have many options. There\u2019s DraftKings, FanDuel, ESPN Bet, Caesars, and BetMGM. There\u2019s also BetRivers, Hard Rock, bet365, Fanatics, and Bally Bet. But none of those platforms are available in the 17 states where online sports betting remains illegal, including California and Texas. Kalshi, a prediction market, doesn\u2019t have<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30757,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[493,2071,6303,167,11455,199],"class_list":{"0":"post-30756","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-social-issues","8":"tag-bans","9":"tag-company","10":"tag-gambling","11":"tag-making","12":"tag-mockery","13":"tag-state"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30756","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30756"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30756\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/30757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30756"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30756"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30756"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}