\n<\/p>\n
Faculty and staff members at Auburn University, Eastern New Mexico University\u2013Roswell and Coastal Carolina University are among those who have been punished for their comments on Charlie Kirk\u2019s death.<\/p>\n
Photo illustration by Justin Morrison\/Inside Higher Ed | Anna Moneymaker\/Getty Images | Nordin Catic\/Getty Images\/The Cambridge Union | Andrew Harnik\/Getty Images<\/p>\n
College faculty and staff members have become popular targets of the right-wing doxing firestorm that ignited in the hours after Charlie Kirk was shot and killed last week during an event at Utah Valley University. As of Thursday afternoon, Inside Higher Ed<\/em> had identified 37 faculty and staff members who are being harassed online for allegedly critical or insensitive social media posts about Kirk. So far, at least 24 of those employees have been terminated, suspended or put on administrative leave, including employees at Auburn University, Eastern New Mexico University\u2013Roswell and Coastal Carolina University. <\/p>\n The force and scale of the doxing campaigns\u2014and the speed with which institutions have moved to suspend or terminate their targets\u2014paints a grim picture of free speech rights on public college campuses. Widespread doxing as a political tool to punish universities and academics is not a new phenomenon, but right now it\u2019s particularly virulent, explained Keith Whittington, a professor at Yale Law School and an expert on free speech. \u201cThe size of the activity, the pressure campaign and the\u00a0\u2026 short period of time is highly unusual,\u201d he said. \u201cUniversities feel like they\u2019re under intense pressure to mollify right-wing activists and try not to draw negative attention from the [Trump] administration.\u201d<\/p>\n Most of the higher education targets of doxing campaigns have been identified first by users on X, Facebook or other social media sites. Then anonymous accounts broadcast their name, employer, photo and contact information, along with calls for their firing. A group that calls itself the Charlie Kirk Data Foundation has also asked the public to submit via email or online the names, identifying information and screenshots of any person who has criticized Kirk or appeared to celebrate his death. On Sunday, the group claimed to have received more than 63,000 unique names.<\/p>\n The first call-outs that gained traction were particularly inflammatory. For example, a University of Toronto professor\u2014who has since been placed on leave\u2014posted in a comment on X, \u201cshooting is honestly too good for so many of you fascist cunts.\u201d This type of speech is often \u201cuniversally condemned,\u201d but it should still be protected by universities committed to First Amendment values, Whittington said. (Or Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.) Now, doxers are attacking even those who engage in mild criticism of Kirk or his supporters, as well as those who merely quote Kirk\u2019s own views on gun control and other topics in juxtaposition to the news of his death. <\/p>\n \u201cWe do seem to see a pattern in which activists are very quickly moving beyond [more egregious] instances to much more marginal cases, where\u00a0\u2026 we might not think that these particular examples of speech violated any widespread view that it is inappropriate or beyond the pale,\u201d Whittington said. <\/p>\n A staff member at Wake Forest University in North Carolina was doxed and later terminated after posting on social media the lyrics, \u201cHe had it coming, he had it coming\u201d from the Chicago<\/em> song \u201cCell Block Tango.\u201d One University of South Carolina professor was targeted by doxers for a critical Facebook comment about a state representative who supported Kirk and was later relieved of teaching duties because of it. A faculty member at East Tennessee State University was put on administrative leave after posting, \u201cYou can\u2019t be upset if one of those deaths in [sic<\/em>] yours #charliekirk\u201d in response to a news headline that quoted Kirk saying, \u201cIt\u2019s worth [it] to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.\u201d Inside Higher Ed<\/em> has opted not to name employees that haven\u2019t been confirmed by their university in order to prevent further harassment. <\/p>\n The number of doxing campaigns targeting educators is on the rise. Experts say higher ed employees can stay safe by keeping work and personal accounts separate, using email masks, and removing personal information from data broker sites. For more tips, see our story here.<\/p>\n So far no higher ed institution has faced as swift and fierce a condemnation from conservatives online as Clemson University, which, in response to the political pressure, has now terminated two faculty members and one staff member over their social media posts about Kirk. An assistant professor at Clemson was among the first to be named and shamed. On Sept. 10, the day Kirk was shot and killed, they posted, \u201cToday was one of the most beautiful days ever. The weather was perfect, sunny with a light breeze. This was such a beautiful day.\u201d Kirk\u2019s supporters interpreted this comment as a celebration of his death. The Clemson professor also reposted jokes about the killing\u2014including \u201cno one mourns the Wicked\u201d and \u201c[N-word] worried about DEI and DIED instead.\u201d <\/p>\n From there, the doxing machine roared to life. The student group Clemson College Republicans was the first to identify the professor and share their posts, according to U.S. representative Russell Fry, whose Sept.\u00a011 post on X about the professor garnered 1.2\u00a0million views. The post was amplified by hundreds of right-wing accounts and other politicians, including U.S. representative Nancy Mace, who has commented on and reposted dozens of similar call-outs. Clemson officials issued a statement on Sept.\u00a012, writing that \u201cthe deeply inappropriate remarks made on social media in response to the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk are reprehensible and do not reflect the University values and principles that define our University community.\u201d They made no mention of disciplining the employees involved and noted only that the university will \u201ctake appropriate action for speech that constitutes a genuine threat which is not protected by the Constitution.\u201d <\/p>\n The pressure campaign continued. Two other employees of the public university\u2014a staff member and another professor\u2014were also targeted for their posts about Kirk\u2019s death, and Republican politicians called for their firing, too. Clemson officials issued another statement a day later, stating that an employee had been suspended and reiterating that officials would take action \u201cin cases where speech is not protected under the U.S. Constitution and the First Amendment.\u201d <\/p>\n The university did not name any employees or say what the suspended employee posted. However, the posts circulating online from the three Clemson employees in question appear to be protected speech, according to the way most First Amendment scholars interpret it. <\/p>\n Over the weekend, U.S. representative Ralph Norman, the X account for the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary Republicans and Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina joined in the calls for the employees\u2019 firing, and some politicians called for the State Legislature to defund Clemson. So did President Donald Trump, who reposted a Truth Social post from South Carolina state representative Jordan Pace that said, \u201cNow Clemson faculty is inciting violence against conservatives. It\u2019s time for a special session to end this. Defund Clemson. End Tenure at State colleges.\u201d<\/p>\n Clemson officials did not respond to Inside Higher Ed<\/em>\u2019s request for comment. The university\u2019s academic freedom policy for faculty states, \u201cWhen they speak or write as private persons, faculty shall be free from institutional censorship or disciplinary action, but they shall avoid creating an impression that they are speaking or acting for the University.\u201d The Faculty Handbook doesn\u2019t outline any clear exceptions to this rule but does note that \u201cas professional educators and academic officers, they are aware that the public may judge their profession and their institution by their utterances. Hence, faculty members should endeavor to be accurate, to exercise due restraint, to show respect for the utterances of others, and, when appropriate, to indicate that they are not officially representing Clemson University.\u201d<\/p>\n On Monday, Clemson announced it had terminated the staff member and removed both faculty members from their teaching duties. By Tuesday, all three employees had been terminated. South Carolina attorney general Alan Wilson told Clemson\u2019s president he had the \u201cfull legal authority\u201d to terminate the employees, writing in a statement, \u201cThe First Amendment protects freedom of speech, but it does not shield threats, glorification of violence, or behavior that undermines the mission of our state institutions.\u201d This contradicts what experts at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and other free speech experts have said in recent days: that speech, even if it\u2019s poorly timed, tasteless, inappropriate, controversial or a nonspecific endorsement of violence, is protected by the U.S. Constitution. <\/p>\n While these name-and-shame campaigns constitute a particularly harsh attack on campus speech, they are nothing new. In fact, they\u2019ve increased in frequency since 2023, when many pro-Palestinian academics were targeted, said Heather Steffen, a humanities professor at Georgetown University and director of the American Association of University Professors\u2019 Faculty First Responders group. <\/p>\n \u201cFaculty who speak about certain issues have been more vulnerable to doxing for a long time,\u201d Steffen said. \u201cSo anyone who talks about issues of race or racism, gender and sexuality, or Palestine tends to be more likely to be doxed or somehow otherwise attacked in a politically motivated fashion, as do academics who are faculty of color, or queer faculty, or trans faculty or pro-Palestinian faculty.\u201d<\/p>\n Ultimately, it\u2019s not about what the employees said, Whittington explained. It\u2019s about the political outcomes.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is primarily about exercising political power and trying to silence and suppress people who disagree with you politically,\u201d he said. \u201cIt doesn\u2019t matter that the offense is trivial\u00a0\u2026 What matters is you\u2019re identifying people that you politically disagree with and you have a moment in which you can exercise power over those people. And there are lots of people willing to take advantage of those opportunities.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Faculty and staff members at Auburn University, Eastern New Mexico University\u2013Roswell and Coastal Carolina University are among those who have been punished for their comments on Charlie Kirk\u2019s death. Photo illustration by Justin Morrison\/Inside Higher Ed | Anna Moneymaker\/Getty Images | Nordin Catic\/Getty Images\/The Cambridge Union | Andrew Harnik\/Getty Images College faculty and staff members<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":22897,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[1972,14007,14022,3350,533,10388,1053],"class_list":{"0":"post-22896","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-education","8":"tag-campaign","9":"tag-doxing","10":"tag-endangers","11":"tag-faculty","12":"tag-free","13":"tag-rightwing","14":"tag-speech"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=22896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22896\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/22897"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=22896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=22896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=22896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}