\n<\/p>\n
I<\/span>n 2016 billionaire Yuri Milner hosted a press conference at One World Observatory, the atrium topping the slick skyscraper at the center of the rebuilt World Trade Center complex. Milner had grown rich investing in tech start-ups, and now he wanted to spend some of that money on sending a spaceship to the stars.<\/p>\n He called the plan Breakthrough Starshot: a project that would eventually take human technology to another solar system. The idea was that high-powered lasers would propel tiny probes to 20 percent of the speed of light, impelling them with enough inertia to launch them toward the nearest star system, Alpha Centauri, within 20 years. Milner and his Breakthrough Initiatives, a group of space science research projects related to life in the universe, were pledging $100 million toward a proof of concept. At the event, Milner was joined by, among others, Mae Jemison, a former astronaut and head of 100 Year Starship, an interstellar research program funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Pete Worden, former director of NASA\u2019s Ames Research Center; and Stephen Hawking, world-famous physicist.<\/p>\n Zachary Manchester, currently an associate professor of robotics at Carnegie Mellon University, signed on for the project\u2019s early stages. He remembers it seeming incredible that he, then a wide-eyed 20-something, was at the top of a metropolis, hanging out with people he considered legends\u2014people such as Freeman Dyson, a physicist best known for positing that advanced civilizations could eventually cloak their stars in megastructures that siphoned their power. Dyson was one of several scientific luminaries who were joining the project, including Nobel Prize winner Saul Perlmutter and Martin Rees, then the U.K.\u2019s Astronomer Royal.<\/p>\n If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.<\/p>\n In short, the Starshot launch event was flashy. A video preview narrated by actor Seth MacFarlane was also flashy. The text that went along with the announcement? Flashy. \u201cWith current rocket propulsion technology, it would take tens or hundreds of millennia to reach our neighboring star system, Alpha Centauri,\u201d it read. \u201cThe stars, it seems, have set strict bounds on human destiny. Until now.\u201d<\/p>\n Milner\u2019s money wasn\u2019t quite an Apollo-project investment, but it was more than anyone had ever dedicated to interstellar travel, a field with a history of relatively little funding and a trail of projects that never reached the stars. In the 2010s DARPA and NASA founded the 100 Year Starship research program to figure out how to send humans light-years away in the next 100 years. Private research groups such as the Tau Zero Foundation and Project Icarus also launched initiatives. None of them have come to much. Maybe this time the goal was within reach. After all, besides the money itself, the big names attached to Breakthrough Starshot gave legitimacy to an endeavor that might otherwise have seemed fringe. The announcement made a splash in the press, including a cover story in this magazine.<\/p>\n But almost a decade later Breakthrough Starshot is conspicuously quiet. After the initial big bang the project seemed to whimper out. Now there are no more big announcements, no multi-institution meetings and no more funding. What remains is confusion among even scientists working on Breakthrough Starshot about the project\u2019s status. According to an e-mail from Worden, Starshot\u2019s executive director, who declined an interview for this article, \u201cWe have put the program on hold and are working to transition portions to others.\u201d<\/p>\n The Breakthrough Starshot announcement even in April 2016 included, from left, documentary writer and producer Ann Druyan, Zachary Manchester, Yuri Milner, Stephen Hawking, Freeman Dyson, Mae Jemison, Pete Worden, Avi Loeb and Philip Lubin.<\/p>\n Bryan Bedder\/Getty Images for Breakthrough Prize Foundation<\/p>\n Between 2016 and today scientists and engineers on the project did make progress toward the stars\u2014or at least toward understanding what it would take to make progress toward the stars. But engineering an interstellar journey is almost ludicrously difficult. With today\u2019s rocket technology, it would take thousands of years to get to the nearest star. Processes and components need to be invented, iterated on and vetted, at great expense, most likely over decades. Sure, \u201c$100 million sounds like a lot of money,\u201d says Edwin Turner, an emeritus astrophysicist at Princeton University and one of the first people to be involved in Breakthrough Starshot. \u201cIt\u2019s certainly more than pocket change for most of us, but it\u2019s not really very much for huge technological programs.\u201d<\/p>\n The total doled out, according to one insider, was far below $100 million anyway. The fact that most of the money never seems to have materialized means the case of Breakthrough Starshot isn\u2019t necessarily one of waste. But it\u2019s a study in the perils of relying on the ultrarich to fund science: when the guy with the billions is ready to move on, the whole project is off.<\/p>\n Breakthrough Starshot is based on a simple but technologically audacious concept: build a powerful set of lasers on Earth, and use them to propel \u201clightsails\u201d on tiny spacecraft weighing about as much as a paperclip. A traditional rocket would carry the craft to space; once it was some 37,000 miles from Earth, the lasers would light up, shooting 100 gigawatts of power at the lightsails. Their combined photons would slam into the sails, powering them forward like wind on a sailboat. Ten minutes later the spacecraft would be zooming at 20 percent of light speed and already halfway to Mars\u2014a journey that takes months with current technology. At that rate it would hit Alpha Centauri\u2014specifically, Proxima Centauri, the closest star in the system\u2014in a couple of decades. During its flyby Starshot would glimpse both the star and the Earth-size exoplanet known to exist in the star system. The craft would send a signal back to Earth before sailing on toward the rest of the Milky Way.<\/p>\n The basic idea of using light for propulsion dates to the 1920s, when Russian scientists Friedrich Zander and Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, pioneers of rocketry, proposed using the pressure of sunlight to push a vehicle through space. Some details of Breakthrough\u2019s specific plans, however, came from the work of a University of California, Santa Barbara, physicist named Philip Lubin. Back in 2009, seven years before Breakthrough Starshot began, Lubin attended a conference at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif. There researchers were discussing focused energy in the form of lasers, microwaves, particle beams, and more, known as directed energy, \u201cmostly for purposes of taking down threats,\u201d Lubin says, meaning incoming missiles.<\/p>\n But as Lubin sat at the conference, he began to dream about other uses for the technology, especially if it were scaled up. Could it be used to protect Earth from asteroids rather than from intercontinental ballistic missiles? Or, he thought later, to propel a spacecraft far, far away? At home Lubin started crunching numbers. \u201cI always want to figure out why it won\u2019t work, why you cannot do this,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n Despite his best efforts to defeat himself, it seemed the idea would work: You could direct energy at an incoming space rock, heat a portion of it up, vaporize that spot and shift the asteroid\u2019s orbit just enough to curve it away from Earth. And you could probably also send a spaceship on a significant journey. Lubin eventually applied for and received NASA funds to research both plans.<\/p>\n After the explosion of a meteor over the Russian city of Chelyabinsk in 2013, Lubin\u2019s planetary-protection work\u2014under the project name DE-STAR\u2014got more attention. Lubin, perhaps a future savior of the planet, was invited to give talks to other scientists, including one at the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) Institute. There he mentioned that this same technology could also enable interstellar flight. A colleague told him he should talk to a guy named Pete Worden.<\/p>\n Lubin didn\u2019t, but he did keep working on his interstellar laser ideas with continued money from NASA. In 2015 he spoke at a conference hosted by the 100 Year Starship project. There he finally met Worden, who suggested Lubin send over a written version of his ideas. Lubin responded with a roadmap for interstellar flight, later published in the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society.<\/p>\n Worden wrote Lubin back quickly. \u201cI have a friend,\u201d Lubin recalls him saying. \u201cYou mind if I send it to my friend?\u201d Lubin told him sure, send it to whomever you want. The friend, of course, was Milner, and by January 2016 Lubin was meeting with Milner at his Bay Area mansion. In front of Milner was Lubin\u2019s interstellar roadmap, bedazzled with yellow Post-it notes. \u201cYuri says to me, \u2018You know, I\u2019ve always dreamed, since I was a child, of going to the stars,\u2019\u201d Lubin recalls. \u201c\u2018And now you\u2019ve shown me the path.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n Milner wanted to send the paper to experts who could evaluate its strengths and flaws. \u201cIf the reviews come back positive, then I\u2019m willing to put in a fair amount of money,\u201d Lubin recalls Milner saying. He mentioned $100 million. \u201cUnfortunately that, by the way, never came true,\u201d Lubin says. \u201cThere was no $100 million.\u201d The top two scientists affiliated with the project declined to be interviewed for this story.<\/p>\n Before officially announcing Starshot, Breakthrough officials had quietly recruited other thinkers in the field. In addition to Turner, who already knew Milner through a separate project called Breakthrough Listen, which searches for signals from alien civilizations, there was Mason Peck, an engineering professor at Cornell University and previously NASA\u2019s chief technologist. \u201cThat kind of opportunity does not come along every day, and I was all in from the very beginning,\u201d Peck says. Kelvin Long, a physicist and aerospace engineer who co-founded Project Icarus, also hopped onboard early. He sent Worden a design study, which he had written in three days while stuck in travel, for a hypothetical space probe that could move at 10 percent of the speed of light.<\/p>\n At Starshot\u2019s founding, the group identified around 30 problems to be solved before anyone could send an interstellar probe anywhere. Worden and James Schalkwyk of the Breakthrough Prize Foundation, working with three researchers from the Australian National University, wrote a chapter providing an overview of the project\u2019s initial phases for physicist and editor Claude Phipps\u2019s 2024 book Laser Propulsion in Space: Fundamentals, Technology, and Future Missions. Thirty-seven research groups, according to that summary, convened to understand and reduce the technology risks in those major areas. \u201cThen the whole project came down to trying to figure out how to spend $100 million productively,\u201d Turner says.<\/p>\n Sometimes members of the crew got a bit of money to support their research, sometimes not. Starshot did bring people together, though\u2014in person and virtually\u2014to talk about their personal research on those problems. \u201cBreakthrough is essentially a set of meetings,\u201d Lubin says. Other sources also cited meetings as a primary way scientists participated in the project.<\/p>\n Beginning in 2016, the Breakthrough Initiatives sponsored Breakthrough Discuss meetings \u201cfocused on life in the Universe and novel ideas for space exploration.\u201d The meetings, which were never specific to Starshot but did frequently cover topics related to the interstellar mission, have continued through 2025, with a gap in 2020 and a virtual meeting in 2021. Smaller satellite meetings also convened over the years to discuss specific technological and scientific aspects of the problem.<\/p>\n The Breakthrough Starshot spacecraft would probably be a small computer chip called a nanocraft. The prototype shown here is about 15 millimeters wide.<\/p>\n While they lasted, the meetings brought scientists and engineers together to investigate where the technology stood, what problems they didn\u2019t have solutions to, how feasible it was to overcome those problems and build something launchable, and what timelines and costs doing so would entail. There was palpable excitement in the early years\u2014scientists felt they were part of a team embarking on an ambitious but tractable undertaking. They knew their biggest challenges were in certain areas: the design of the sail, the functionality of the laser system, the makeup of the spacecraft, and the construction of a communications apparatus that could signal back to Earth from light-years away. So, essentially, the whole system.<\/p>\n It\u2019s hardly worth sending a ship to another star if you won\u2019t be able to prove you\u2019ve done it. Starshot would need to not just reach Proxima Centauri but also find a way to send back a signal strong enough to be detectable on Earth. It\u2019s a considerable challenge, however, to point a signal in the right direction from light-years away when both the probe and Earth are moving. Plus, both those feats must be accomplished with diminutive instruments on a spacecraft the mass of a pen cap or two.<\/p>\n According to Peck, Milner might have had unrealistic ideas\u2014or at least ideas that conflicted with some of the scientists\u2019 suggestions\u2014about what those signals should be like. \u201cI do think Yuri Milner is very intelligent,\u201d Peck says. \u201cI do think he has an adequate technical background\u201d for the project. But he wanted things like video or 4K images from Alpha Centauri. And that, in Peck\u2019s view, was putting the cart before the horse, to make an ancient analogy for a 21st-century endeavor.<\/p>\n To Peck, getting just one computer bit of information from another solar system would be valuable. Perhaps the probe could send a yes-or-no answer to a single question\u2014is there a certain percentage of oxygen in the planet\u2019s atmosphere, for instance, or does the radiation environment seem suitable for life? \u201cIt\u2019s only incrementally better to get a gigabit from Proxima Centauri,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n According to the 2024 book chapter, the team found several ways to make comms somewhat feasible. The scientists could build a huge array of smaller receivers on the Earth end to catch weak transmissions. They also could enlarge the spacecrafts\u2019 transmitting antenna and send communications in optical instead of radio wavelengths, which can transfer more data faster. The team decided to use the sun as a beacon to point the homebound transmission toward, helping the information reach the right part of the vast universe. Still, Long calls the communications problem the \u201celephant in the room\u201d in that it didn\u2019t get as much attention in initial research as other topics did\u2014an assessment Carnegie Mellon\u2019s Manchester agrees with.<\/p>\n P<\/span>ropelling the probes far enough and fast enough that they have something to communicate requires solving another problem: the lasers. Or, as the Starshot team called them, \u201cthe photon engine.\u201d<\/p>\n The first issue, the team found, was that a single laser would need to be impractically powerful\u2014incomparable to anything that exists today. The researchers could create an array of smaller lasers whose beams would combine into one with 100 gigawatts of power, but then they\u2019d need to ensure the light waves lined up with one another, like sound waves that are in tune. \u201cPeople made serious progress on that,\u201d Manchester says. \u201cThey were able to do it with tens of lasers in the lab, which is a breakthrough.\u201d<\/p>\n There was palpable excitement in the early years\u2014scientists felt they were part of a team embarking on an ambitious but tractable undertaking.<\/p>\n But not quite enough of a breakthrough for Breakthrough. The project would need even more lasers, and those lasers would have to work outside the lab to reach deep into space\u2014which poses another problem. \u201cHow do you get that out of the atmosphere without getting messed up?\u201d Manchester asks. Turbulence in the upper air will cause the beam to twinkle.<\/p>\n They would need to adjust for that twinkling in real time. One laser, called a guide star, could shoot through the atmosphere constantly, and the scientists could use data about how it got distorted to correct the other lasers. But that correction would require millions of adjustments every second. In the 2024 book chapter, Worden and his co-authors pegged it as potentially the largest technical hurdle for the entire program.<\/p>\n The lasers pose a financial hurdle, too. To make Starshot feasible, the cost of powering them must come down from the current price of $100 per watt to around $0.01 to $0.05 per watt, according to Long. Peck is optimistic because, theoretically, the cost of laser power should decrease over time, similar to how Moore\u2019s law predicted that transistors in computer chips should get steadily smaller as the years passed. Still, that discount isn\u2019t instantaneous. \u201cWe were likely looking at a launch date not in the next 20 years, as the sponsor had hoped, but perhaps in 30 or 40 years,\u201d Long says.<\/p>\n Regardless of how much the laser costs, what form it takes or when any of this finally happens, policy is an issue. A laser that blasts out the equivalent of four power stations\u2019 worth of energy is, as the conference that spurred Lubin\u2019s original research interest demonstrates, a weapon. The only solutions for that problem are international cooperation and trust, which aren\u2019t at all-time highs right now.<\/p>\n Once the photon engine is up and working, that laser energy has to hit the lightsail of a given spacecraft and propel it forward with a power of about 100 gigawatts. The sail must hold up to the onslaught while withstanding acceleration at a g-force of 40,000\u2014that is, 40,000 times the pull of gravity you would feel if you fell off a cliff.<\/p>\n Substances that can withstand both the rigors of warp speed and the shock of a laser-cannon blast and remain reflective tend to be heavy. Starshot envisioned a lightsail material that can stretch four meters wide but weigh only a gram. The initial Breakthrough phase aimed to identify potential materials and designs, a process led by Harry Atwater of the California Institute of Technology, who did not respond to a request for an interview. The leading candidate substance his team found, according to the 2024 summary, is silicon nitride. Atwater and his colleagues published that result in 2022. Engineers have been able to fabricate it at submicron thicknesses\u2014less than one-tenth the thickness of Saran Wrap.<\/p>\n Ultrathin wafers of the material can be puzzle-pieced together into a larger structure that is mostly reflective and doesn\u2019t absorb much light. Breakthrough engineers have done this assembly on the millimeter scale but not the meter scale. Atwater and his team also coded a computer simulation that could figure out how various lightsail designs would perform during interstellar flight.<\/p>\n Another group, based at the University of Sydney, worked on ways to keep the hypothetical lightsail stable. The researchers joined meetings in 2021 and 2022 and shared their findings, but they never received any money from Breakthrough. \u201cThe whole thing always was outrageous,\u201d University of Sydney physicist Michael Wheatland says of the project\u2019s ambition. \u201cI never believed it. But I think my perspective on things like this is that if you do fundamental research to try to solve a problem in the context of some outrageous scheme like that, then you can do really useful research.\u201d<\/p>\n And that\u2019s what the Sydney team did. They knew the sail would constantly be pushed around by the laser beam as it accelerated, so the team had to find some way to push it back to center. \u201cBut that then gives you oscillations,\u201d Wheatland says. Moving the laser could account for that, but like with the correction to untwinkle the lasers, the movement may be too much to ask of a bunch of lasers.<\/p>\n When the project started, people thought interstellar travel was crazy\u2014or they didn\u2019t think about it at all.<\/p>\n The sails are a separate problem from the spacecraft itself, which must be as small and lightweight as possible. Breakthrough calls the tiny spaceships \u201cnanocraft.\u201d The leading candidate is the brainchild of Manchester, that wide-eyed graduate student when the program began. Manchester\u2019s early creations weren\u2019t meant for voyaging beyond the solar system\u2014or even beyond Earth\u2019s orbit. As a graduate student at Cornell, working under Peck, he started designing postage-stamp-sized satellites around 2009. He called them, variously, Sprites and ChipSats. In 2011 he crowdfunded the project, and in 2014 he launched around 100 ChipSats to space. A glitch prevented them from deploying, though, and they burned up on the way back through the atmosphere.<\/p>\n After that disappointment, Manchester became involved with Breakthrough. His tiny satellites seemed like just what the team was looking for. \u201cThe notional idea was that some version of my ChipSat would end up being attached to that lightsail,\u201d he says. Manchester went on to do his postdoc at Harvard University, working officially on non-ChipSat projects. But with Breakthrough\u2019s help he was able to keep the ChipSat project on life support. \u201cThey were super nice to me during all of that,\u201d he says. \u201cThey would help me out, and they gave me little bits of funding.\u201d<\/p>\n In 2019 Manchester was able to go for launch again, successfully deploying 105 ChipSats at once. He showed they could communicate with one another in space, acting as a swarm. The federal government let him fly them only once. \u201cThen the [Federal Communications Commission] decided that we were going to destroy the world with space debris,\u201d he says\u2014which wouldn\u2019t be a problem if they were headed way beyond low Earth orbit, to infinity and beyond.<\/p>\n B<\/span>reakthrough hasn\u2019t gone beyond anywhere, of course. Still, in all four problem areas, the teams found that nothing was technically wrong with the basic plan. They also did enough research to find out what they didn\u2019t know and what kinds of technical development (and money) would be required to make the concept reality.<\/p>\n Progress was almost certainly slowed by the fact that the $100 million never materialized. Although the Starshot grants weren\u2019t made public, Lubin\u2019s experience might illustrate the scale of the spending. His group got two grants, one for $116,000 and another for about $80,000. Some of his colleagues in Australia also got $80,000. \u201cWe got less than $200,000 spread out over eight years,\u201d Lubin says. That was much less than NASA put toward Lubin\u2019s directed-energy interstellar work, although Breakthrough\u2019s press-centric approach meant its name was better associated with the project. \u201cBreakthrough contributed less than 5 percent of the funding in our program in the end,\u201d Lubin says. \u201cSo it was always a little blip along the way. But in the public mind the entire program was a Breakthrough program, and that is simply not true at all.\u201d<\/p>\n The closest star system to the sun, Alpha Centauri, includes three stars. Two of them are a binary pair, seen in this close-up from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory (inset). A third star, Proxima Centauri, orbits the central two.<\/p>\n Zdenek Bardon (optical); NASA\/CXC\/University of Colorado\/T. Ayres et al. (x-ray)<\/p>\n Lubin calculates that overall, Breakthrough spent roughly $4.5 million on about 30 contracts. In late January 2025, after I contacted Worden and Avi Loeb of Harvard, also a Breakthrough scientist, a spokesperson for the Breakthrough Prize Foundation reached out. Worden and Loeb had declined interviews, but the spokesperson said, \u201cI have a potential way to move your story significantly forward.\u201d She later referred to a report on the project that would be finished around spring 2025 and made available to Scientific American, but that report had not appeared by the time this issue went to print.<\/p>\n At this stage the future of the program is murky. Starshot appears to be on indefinite hold, if not over, although there was no final announcement and no fanfare to match its beginnings. Peck is not sure where things stand. \u201cAs far as I can tell, they\u2019ve put it on pause, at least,\u201d he says. \u201cAnd I think it\u2019s probably not going to continue for the near future.\u201d<\/p>\n Physicist Martijn de Sterke, part of the Sydney group, and his colleague Boris Kuhlmey, a Sydney physicist who\u2019s helping with Starship-related research, heard only informally that Breakthrough Starshot was done. \u201cIt appears that this project has kind of disappeared,\u201d de Sterke says. \u201cWe have not heard from them for probably two years.\u201d<\/p>\n Some sources have interpreted the program\u2019s end as a realization that an actual starship, though technically possible, is still distant. \u201cI think it\u2019s going to take 30 to 50 years of very hard work by a large number of very dedicated people, much like a Manhattan Project on steroids,\u201d Lubin says. Maybe that timeline wasn\u2019t appealing to Milner, some sources speculate, and neither was spending a Manhattan Project amount of money. Turner has a different perspective on how things turned out. To explain, he turns to the familiar example of medieval cathedrals, which took centuries to build\u2014a length of time that humans rarely dedicate to any single project these days. \u201cThat [comparison] is often made as a kind of snide criticism of the short-sightedness of modern civilizations or people or profit motives,\u201d Turner says. \u201cBut I think it\u2019s actually a result of how fast technology is moving.\u201d<\/p>\n The innovations behind a cathedral\u2019s arches and finials didn\u2019t change much over the 200-year course of its construction. But the technology undergirding our world is unrecognizable compared with that of just a couple of decades ago. \u201cIt\u2019s very hard trying to imagine a major technological thing we\u2019re working on now for which they could have done anything at all useful 200 years ago,\u201d Turner says. \u201cNothing they could have done would make the slightest difference to us.\u201d Maybe that\u2019s what Breakthrough leadership decided about Starshot: it\u2019s best left to the people of tomorrow.<\/p>\n Despite the project\u2019s nebulous end and uncertain future, many participants spoke about Breakthrough positively. Manchester, for instance, sees it as at least a psychological success. When the project started, people thought interstellar travel was crazy\u2014or they didn\u2019t think about it at all. \u201cBreakthrough changed society\u2019s conception of this kind of stuff as a legitimate area of scientific inquiry,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n Serious people worked on the project, did serious things, made serious progress\u2014even if not directly on a path toward Alpha Centauri. \u201cIt\u2019s still a long way off, but it\u2019s a lot closer than it was five or six years ago,\u201d Manchester concludes. The program also inspired people such as de Sterke and Kuhlmey to work on fundamental physics and engineering problems that might not have gotten attention otherwise. And maybe, at the end of the day, that will be Starshot\u2019s legacy. \u201cIf there was a one-sentence summary of what Breakthrough was and did,\u201d Lubin says, \u201cit was to bring attention to the dream.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In 2016 billionaire Yuri Milner hosted a press conference at One World Observatory, the atrium topping the slick skyscraper at the center of the rebuilt World Trade Center complex. Milner had grown rich investing in tech start-ups, and now he wanted to spend some of that money on sending a spaceship to the stars. He<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":21779,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[1419,5388,5236,8157,9075,2900,2509,3949,13354],"class_list":{"0":"post-21778","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-alpha","9":"tag-billionaires","10":"tag-breakthrough","11":"tag-centauri","12":"tag-demise","13":"tag-interstellar","14":"tag-mission","15":"tag-quiet","16":"tag-starshot"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21778"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21778\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/21779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}On supporting science journalism<\/h2>\n