{"id":14504,"date":"2025-08-07T12:35:15","date_gmt":"2025-08-07T12:35:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/?p=14504"},"modified":"2025-08-07T12:35:15","modified_gmt":"2025-08-07T12:35:15","slug":"first-people-detained-under-one-in-one-out-deal-before-being-sent-back-to-france-uk-politics-live-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/?p=14504","title":{"rendered":"First people detained under \u2018one in, one out\u2019 deal before being sent back to France \u2013 UK politics live | Politics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Yvette Cooper says first migrants have been detained under &#8216;one in, one out&#8217; deal, prior to being sent back to France<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Migrants who arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel have been detained under the new \u201cone in, one out\u201d deal, PA Media reports. PA says:<\/p>\n<p>The first detentions came as people arrived in Dover on Wednesday, the first day the pilot scheme came into force.<\/p>\n<p>Pictures showed the migrants wearing life jackets disembarking from Border Force boats.<\/p>\n<p>The Home Office said detentions began for those who arrived on Wednesday afternoon and they will be held in immigration removal centres until they are returned to France.<\/p>\n<p>Home secretary <strong class=\"dcr-in3yi3\">Yvette Cooper<\/strong> said: \u201cYesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil and will now be held in detention until they can be returned to France.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat sends a message to every migrant currently thinking of paying organised crime gangs to go to the UK that they will be risking their lives and throwing away their money if they get into a small boat.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"dcr-1inf02i\"><\/span><span class=\"dcr-1qvd3m6\">Migrants being brought in to the Border Force compound in Dover from a Border Force vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel yesterday.<\/span> Photograph: Gareth Fuller\/PAShare<\/p>\n<p>Updated at\u00a005.02 EDT<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"svgminus\" class=\"dcr-yhdhkr\"><\/span><span id=\"svgplus\" class=\"dcr-yhdhkr\"><\/span><span class=\"dcr-90inr0\"><span id=\"key-events-carousel-mobile\"\/><span class=\"dcr-90inr0\"><\/p>\n<p>Key events<\/p>\n<p><\/span><span id=\"filter-toggle-mobile\"\/>Show key events only<\/p>\n<p><span>Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Tories call for Rushanara Ali&#8217;s resignation over rent hike after tenants told they would have to move<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The Conservative party is now calling for the resignation of Rushanara Ali, the homelessness minister, after she told tenants in a house she owns they would have to move, and then increased the rent by \u00a3700 a month when it was relet after they had moved out. Ali says she wanted to sell the house, and only relisted it for rental when she could not find a buyer, but she has been accused of hypocrisy because the government is legislating to stop landlords who evict tenants on the grounds they want to sell from then swiftly re-letting.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">In a post on social media, <strong>Kevin Hollinrake<\/strong>, the Tory chair, said:<\/p>\n<p>This is staggering hypocrisy from Rushanara Ali.<\/p>\n<p>It is totally unacceptable for the Government minister in charge of Labour\u2019s new renters laws and homelessness to have turfed out her own tenants in order to hike the rent (by over 20%)<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m sorry, but she must resign.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">A spokesperson for Ali said: \u201cRushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><strong>Matthew Weaver<\/strong> has the full story here.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">JD Vance reportedly set to start family holiday in UK by staying with David Lammy at Chevening<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">JD Vance, the US vice president, will start his summer holiday in the UK by staying with David Lammy, the foreign secretary, at Chevening, Lammy\u2019s grace-and-favour country home, the Telegraph reports.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">In his story, <strong>Rob Crilly<\/strong> says Vance and his family will arrive on Friday and that, as well as staying with Lammy, they will visit Hampton Court before heading for the Cotswolds, where they are spending most of their break.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Lammy knew Vance before he became vice president and he descibes him as a friend. Speaking about the relationship to the BBC last year, he said:<\/p>\n<p>We share a similar working-class background with addiction issues in our family. We\u2019ve written books on that. We\u2019ve talked about that. And we\u2019re both Christians, so I think I can find common ground with JD Vance.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Tories call for asylum seekers caught working to be automatically disqualified from having claim accepted<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The <strong>Conservative party<\/strong> is also calling today for all asylum seekers caught working illegally to be automatically disqualified from having their claim accepted. In a news release, the party says:<\/p>\n<p>The Conservatives are setting out new proposals that would mean asylum seeker caught illegally working should have their claim rejected automatically and face immediate deportation, either to their country of origin or to a safe third country.<\/p>\n<p>The scale of this failure was laid bare when Chris Philp MP, the shadow home secretary, exposed this issue after a visit to a taxpayer-funded asylum hotel in June and found it operating as a delivery hub. Illegal working was taking place in plain sight, security guards did nothing, and the platforms continued to profit from this racket despite previous Home Office agreements.<\/p>\n<p>Chris Philp MP also wrote to Deliveroo, Just Eat, Uber Eats, and the home secretary calling for an immediate crackdown on illegal working by asylum seekers. His demands included urgent enforcement against any company failing to uphold immigration law, the removal of all illegal workers from delivery platforms, and action to stop illegal working from Home Office-run asylum accommodation.<\/p>\n<p>The following month, the home secretary announced a measly agreement between delivery companies and the Home Office to share information on the location of asylum hotels. It does nothing to punish offenders or close loopholes, such as account sharing, and therefore, did absolutely nothing to tackle this problem.<\/p>\n<p>Labour\u2019s failure to enforce the law is creating a pull factor for illegal immigration, leading to record crossings, a collapsing border, and a booming black market in taxpayer-subsidised gig economy jobs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The alternative view is that asylum seekers should be allowed to work in the UK while their claim is being considered. It is one of the arguments that the journalist <strong>Nicola Kelly<\/strong> makes in her excellent book Anywhere But Here: How Britain\u2019s Broken Asylum System Fails Us All. She says:<\/p>\n<p>By allowing asylum seekers to volunteer and use the skills they have \u2013 and loosening, or ideally lifting, the ban on the right to work \u2013 research shows that the government could save \u00a31bn over a 10-year period. Germany and France allow asylum seekers to work after six months; Sweden after just one day. The US, too, gives people permission to work while their claims are being processed. We could do the same. There is a net benefit to the economy from immigration.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Kelly\u2019s book is well worth reading. It explains in detail how the asylum system in the UK does, or rather doesn\u2019t, work, but it\u2019s a book about people, not policy, with vivid, compassionate, first-hand reporting, and a strong narrative pull. I found it powerful and revealing. <strong>Emine Saner<\/strong> wrote about it in much more detail in an interview with Kelly we published earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Bank of England cuts interest rate for fifth time in a year to 4%<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The Bank of England has cut interest rates for a fifth time in a year amid mounting concern about the strength of the economy, <strong>Richard Partington<\/strong> reports. The Bank\u2019s monetary policy committee voted by a majority to reduce its key base rate from 4.25% to 4%.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The Conservatives say they are not impressed by the news that the first small boat migrants have been detained under the \u201cone in, one out\u201d deal with France. In a statement, <strong>Chris Philp<\/strong>, the shadow home secretary, said:<\/p>\n<p>Keir Starmer\u2019s promise last year to \u2018smash the gangs\u2019 has turned out to be nothing more than a gimmick that didn\u2019t work, and this is just the same.<\/p>\n<p>They are detaining a token handful of arrivals and in return we accept unvetted migrants from France. The whole thing is riddled with loopholes, opt-outs and legal escape routes that will make removals near-impossible.<\/p>\n<p>One clause exempts anyone with a claim certified as \u2018clearly unfounded\u2019 pending court proceedings, creating a field day for human rights lawyers. Anyone claiming to be under 18 or making a modern slavery claim gets to avoid the scheme too.<\/p>\n<p>94% of illegal arrivals will still remain in the UK under this deal. How exactly is that supposed to deter anyone?<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">DfE welcomes improvement in school absence figures for England, though problem still worse than pre-Covid<\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"dcr-sa35sa\">Richard Adams<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><em>Richard Adams is the Guardian\u2019s eduction editor.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">School attendance in England continued to slowly improve last year, according to new data published this morning by the <strong>Department for Education<\/strong> which claimed it was a \u201cdramatic improvement\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The figures for the autumn term of 2024-25 showed that absence rates in state secondary schools fell by half a percentage point to 7.7% compared with the year before, while primaries also showed a slight improvement to 5%. Persistent absences &#8211; the proportion of pupils who missed 10% or more of time in the classroom &#8211; also fell, from 19.5% in 2023-24 to 17.8% in 2024-25, and well below the 24% rates seen around 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">However all the indicators remain above the rates of absence seen before the Covid pandemic, while severe absence &#8211; pupils missing 50% or more &#8211; rose slightly to 2%, and remains at record levels, as do absences caused by unauthorised family holidays.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The DfE emphasised that 140,000 fewer pupils were persistently absent in autumn, including 45,000 children and young people from deprived backgrounds.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><strong>Bridget Phillipson<\/strong>, the education secretary, said:<\/p>\n<p>The record improvement in school attendance shows we are turning the tide on a crisis that saw a generation go missing from England\u2019s schools.<\/p>\n<p>Getting children back in classrooms, where they belong, is non-negotiable if we are to break the unfair link between background and success so we can build a fairer country &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>When we tackle attendance head-on, everyone benefits \u2013 pupils get the consistent education they deserve, teachers can focus on driving up standards, and we build the stronger workforce our economy needs.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<p>Updated at\u00a007.30 EDT<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Green party backs Brown&#8217;s call for taxes on gambling industry to fund abolition of two-child benefit cap<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The Green party has backed Gordon Brown\u2019s call for new taxes on the gambling industry to fund the abolition of the two-child benefit cap. The party issued this statement from <strong>Natalie Bennett<\/strong>, a Green peer and former party leader.<\/p>\n<p>Having been at the heart of the New Labour government, which unleashed the toxic, destructive gambling industry that we have today with the 2005 Gambling Act, it is good to see Gordon Brown now calling for fair taxation of the massive cash cow.<\/p>\n<p>And excellent that he is calling for that to money to be used to end the two-child benefit cap, a policy deliberately causing child poverty that is astonishingly still in place a year into this Labour government.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">And this is <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AdrianRamsay\/status\/1953390894930935887\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">from<\/a> <strong>Adrian Ramsay,<\/strong> the current co-leader.<\/p>\n<p>Gordon Brown is right: we can\u2019t let Reeves\u2019s obsession with her fiscal rules push more children into poverty The answer is simple: tax wealth fairly<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Homelessness minister Rushanara Ali accused of hypocrisy by Tories over hiking rent after removing tenants<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><strong>Rushanara Ali<\/strong>, the homelessness minister, is facing criticism for hiking rent on a property she owns by hundreds of pounds, reportedly just weeks after the previous tenants\u2019 contract ended, PA Media reports. PA says:<\/p>\n<p>Four tenants who rented a house in east London from Ali were sent an email last November saying their lease would not be renewed, which also gave them four months\u2019 notice to leave, the i newspaper reported.<\/p>\n<p>Ali\u2019s property was then re-listed with a \u00a3700 rent increase within weeks, the newspaper said.<\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson for the minister said: \u201c<em>Rushanara<\/em> takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The house, rented on a fixed-term contract, was put up for sale while the tenants were living there, and it was only re-listed as a rental because it had not sold, according to the i.<\/p>\n<p>But the minister\u2019s actions are now facing scrutiny from rental rights campaigners, as the government seeks to clamp down on what it sees as unfair rental practices.<\/p>\n<p>The renters\u2019 rights bill includes measures to ban landlords who end a tenancy to sell a property from re-listing it for six months.<\/p>\n<p>The bill, which is nearing its end stages of scrutiny in parliament, will also abolish fixed-term tenancies and ensure landlords give four months\u2019 notice if they want to sell their property.<\/p>\n<p>Ben Twomey, chief executive of <strong class=\"dcr-in3yi3\">Generation Rent<\/strong>, described the allegations as \u201cshocking and a wake-up call to government on the need to push ahead as quickly as possible to improve protections for renters\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>He added: \u201cIt is bad enough when any landlord turfs out their tenant to hike up the rent, or tries their luck with unfair claims on the deposit, but the minister responsible for homelessness knows only too well about the harm caused by this behaviour.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese allegations highlight common practices that the government can eradicate.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe renters\u2019 rights bill would ban landlords who evict tenants to sell the property from re-letting it within 12 months, to deter this kind of abuse \u2013 but unfortunately members of the House of Lords have voted to reduce this to six months.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Tom Darling, director at the <strong class=\"dcr-in3yi3\">Renters\u2019 Reform Coalition<\/strong>, said: \u201cIt\u2019s mind-boggling that we have a homelessness minister who has just evicted four people in order to rake in more rent \u2013 something that will soon be illegal under the Renters\u2019 Rights Bill her own department is bringing through Parliament.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe government are currently considering an amendment to the legislation from the House of Lords which reduces the ban on re-letting after eviction from 12 months to six months. The government must remove this amendment, and at the very least minister Ali must recuse herself from any discussions on this within government.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Shadow housing secretary <strong class=\"dcr-in3yi3\">James Cleverly<\/strong> told the i that Ali should consider her position as a minister, as the allegations \u201cwould be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Miliband announces biggest ever renewable energy auction<\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"dcr-sa35sa\">Helena Horton<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><em>Helena Horton is a Guardian environment reporter.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><strong>Ed Miliband<\/strong>, the energy secretary, has opened the application process for what he hopes will be the \u201cbiggest renewable energy auction\u201d in history. To meet his self-imposed 2030 goal to decarbonise the electricity grid, Miliband needs to secure around 8GW of offshore wind during this auction. Last year, a record 5.34GW was secured.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The process includes agreeing a \u201cstrike price\u201d with bidders, which is a guaranteed amount they will be paid per mw\/h throughout the duration of the deal. Miliband is offering a pretty sweet deal to renewables companies &#8211; extending the contracts to 20 years, locking in those prices for that length of time, and hiking the maximum strike price cost to \u00a3113\/mwh compared to \u00a3102 in 2024, which was for a shorter length of time, 10 years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Floating offshore wind has been hiked to \u00a3271\/MWh, up from \u00a3245, and onshore wind has risen from \u00a389\/MWh to \u00a392.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The current wholesale electricity price in the UK is approximately \u00a368.22 per MWh, though it does rise in winter as it is set by gas, so when demand is hiked by people heating their homes the price goes up. In December, January and February this year, for example, the average wholesale electricity price was around \u00a3110\/MWh.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">These more expensive contracts could put Miliband\u2019s promise to lower bills in peril, as my colleague <strong>Nils Pratley<\/strong> has explained.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Critics of Miliband have said that announcing firm targets, with this needing to be the biggest auction ever, has meant renewable companies have been able to negotiate high prices as his reputation is staked on whether they participate in the auction.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">When Conservative shadow energy secretary Clare Coutinho ran an auction in 2023, it failed to attract any offshore wind bids, and she was roundly criticised for not setting the strike price high enough.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Miliband said:<\/p>\n<p>Last year\u2019s auction round secured funding for the largest floating offshore wind project in the world, as well as a record number of solar projects.<\/p>\n<p>This year, we want to build on that success as we continue our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower &#8211; ending our reliance on volatile global gas prices so we can bring household bills down for good.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Full details of the CfD allocation round can be found here.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Brown says two-child benefit cap functions as &#8216;built-in escalator&#8217; for child poverty figures, pushing them towards 5m<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">In his Today programme interview <strong>Gordon Brown<\/strong>, the former Labour prime minister, said that child poverty would get worse over the coming years if the two-child benefit cap remains because it functions as an \u201cescalator\u201d for poverty. He said:<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re dealing with a social crisis. We\u2019re dealing with poor children that are living what you might say are separate lives. If I tell you that a million children will be trying to sleep tonight without a bed of their own, that two million children are in homes which don\u2019t have either a cooker or a fridge or a washing machine, and certainly are not being able to spend money on hygiene goods like toothpaste and soap and shampoo, and that three million children are skipping meals \u2026<\/p>\n<p>This problem is getting worse. It\u2019s going to worsen over the next few years because there\u2019s a built in escalator in the poverty figures, because of the two-child rule. By the early 2030s five million children would be in poverty. And these are record figures, unprecedented since figures [started being] collected in the 1960s.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Under the two-child benefit cap, which was introduced by the last Conservative government, families are not able to claim key child-related benefits for the third child and subsequent children. The policy was introduced in 2017 and it functions as a poverty \u201cescalator\u201d because when it was introduced it was not retrospective, and families only started being affected as new children were born.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<p>Updated at\u00a005.46 EDT<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Brown suggests review should consider future of pension triple lock<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">In his Today programme interview, <strong>Gordon Brown<\/strong> was repeatedly asked by <strong>Amol Rajan<\/strong> if he favoured keeping the pension triple lock (which is widely seen by experts as overly-generous to pensioners \u2013 although the main political parties are terrified of the electoral consequences of saying they will get rid of it). Brown largely avoided the question, saying that it would not be reasonable to comment on one welfare measure without reviewing the whole system, but he end up saying a review would be a good idea. Responding to Rajan\u2019s question, <strong>Brown<\/strong> said:<\/p>\n<p>You\u2019re now asking me to go into the whole area of welfare expenditure. And if I were to do that, I would have a complete review of that \u2026<\/p>\n<p>I\u2018m not going to say, look, let\u2019s take this one measure at the expense of others. Let\u2019s look at it as a whole \u2026<\/p>\n<p>If you want to look at the future of pensions, then I think you\u2019ve got other review on it, as we did about 20 years ago, and came up with some conclusions. It probably is right to have that kind of review for the future, but not to cherry pick one measure against another.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Brown also refused to say whether he thought it was sensible for Labour to rule out raising income tax, national insurance or VAT in its election manifesto last year. When first asked if this was a good idea, he just said it was a manifesto commitment. When asked if it was a \u201cwise\u201d commitment, he laughed briefly, and said that the plan he was proposing, for gambling taxes to fund the abolition of the two-child benefit cap (see 9.14am), did not break the manifesto commitments.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><strong>Keir Starmer<\/strong> has also issued a statement about the detention of small boat arrivals (see 9.58am) on his social media feed. He says:<\/p>\n<p>We have detained the first illegal migrants under our new deal before returning them to France. No gimmicks, just results.<\/p>\n<p>If you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back.<\/p>\n<p>When I say I will stop at nothing to secure our borders, I mean it.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Cooper says she expects first migrant returns to France under &#8216;one in, one out&#8217; deal to happen within weeks<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><strong>Yvette Cooper,<\/strong> the home secretary, declined to say how many migrants arriving on small boats had been detained as she spoke to reporters about the launch of the \u201cone in, one out\u201d returns deal with France today. (See 9.58am.) She said:<\/p>\n<p>The transfers to immigration removal centres are under way as we speak, so we won\u2019t provide operational details at this point that criminal gangs can simply use and exploit.<\/p>\n<p>But no-one should be in any doubt: anyone who arrives from now on is eligible for immediate detention and return.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">She said the first migrants could be sent back within weeks.<\/p>\n<p>The pilot has now begun, so the first migrants who have arrived on the small boats are now in detention. We will then swiftly make the referrals to France and that process will now start to be able to return people to France.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s the beginning of the pilot and it will build as well over time, but we\u2019re also clear that France is a safe country, so we will robustly defend against any legal challenge that people try.<\/p>\n<p>We do expect for people to start being returned in a matter of weeks.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"dcr-1inf02i\"><\/span><span class=\"dcr-1qvd3m6\">Yvette Cooper on Sky News<\/span> Photograph: Sky NewsShare<\/p>\n<p>Updated at\u00a005.12 EDT<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Yvette Cooper says first migrants have been detained under &#8216;one in, one out&#8217; deal, prior to being sent back to France<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Migrants who arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel have been detained under the new \u201cone in, one out\u201d deal, PA Media reports. PA says:<\/p>\n<p>The first detentions came as people arrived in Dover on Wednesday, the first day the pilot scheme came into force.<\/p>\n<p>Pictures showed the migrants wearing life jackets disembarking from Border Force boats.<\/p>\n<p>The Home Office said detentions began for those who arrived on Wednesday afternoon and they will be held in immigration removal centres until they are returned to France.<\/p>\n<p>Home secretary <strong class=\"dcr-in3yi3\">Yvette Cooper<\/strong> said: \u201cYesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil and will now be held in detention until they can be returned to France.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat sends a message to every migrant currently thinking of paying organised crime gangs to go to the UK that they will be risking their lives and throwing away their money if they get into a small boat.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"dcr-1inf02i\"><\/span><span class=\"dcr-1qvd3m6\">Migrants being brought in to the Border Force compound in Dover from a Border Force vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel yesterday.<\/span> Photograph: Gareth Fuller\/PAShare<\/p>\n<p>Updated at\u00a005.02 EDT<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Brown says having Europe-wide borrowing plan for extra defence spending would give markets assurance they need<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">This is what <strong>Gordon Brown<\/strong> said in his Today programme interview when asked to give more details of his plan to exempt from extra defence spending from the fiscal rules. He said other European countries were already looking at this, and that having a European-wide initiative would persuade the bond markets that in this case the rise in borrowing was justified. He said:<\/p>\n<p>If you look around Europe at the moment, you\u2019ll see that the Germans are looking at what they can do outside the fiscal rules. The European stability and growth pact is exempting a lot of defence money from the normal fiscal rules. The French are looking at other ways of doing it. The Polish have already done that.<\/p>\n<p>What I\u2019m actually asking for is a European-wide initiative where individual countries will come together and say, Look, we all have to do this. We all have to find, let\u2019s say, an extra 1%, because 5% of course is building on some of what\u2019s already been spent.<\/p>\n<p>So let\u2019s say we\u2019ve got to find another 1% \u2013 that\u2019s \u00a330bn in Britain\u2019s case. Let\u2019s do it jointly \u2013 either jointly issued bonds or individually issued bonds that are simultaneous and therefore seen by the markets as an extraordinary issue.<\/p>\n<p>Remember, if we can prevent war by defence expenditure, we\u2019re not actually only preventing war, we\u2019re preventing damage to the economy. This is a long-term risk. It has to be deal with differently.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<p>Updated at\u00a004.44 EDT<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Bank of England poised to cut interest rates<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The Bank of England is poised to cut interest rates today despite a growing divide between its policymakers over the dangers to the economy from high inflation and rising unemployment, <strong>Richard Partington<\/strong> reports.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"dcr-1wl2b6o\">Gordon Brown urges Reeves to create budget &#8216;headroom&#8217; by making rise in defence spending exempt from fiscal rules<\/h2>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Good morning. In every era in politics there are claims that the current generation of politicians aren\u2019t as impressive as the ones that came before. A lot of this is just false memory warped by nostalgia, but in the UK at the moment there are eight former prime ministers and they provide a sub-set that does, sort of, stand up the theory.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Five of them were in office after 2010 \u2013 David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak \u2013 and their contribution to public life at the moment is, frankly, minimal, or negative. But the three who were in office before 2010 \u2013 John Major, Tony Blair, and <strong>Gordon Brown<\/strong> \u2013 remain serious voices. Major is 82, he does not speak out much, but when he does, he is always worth hearing. Blair is running a thinktank actively trying to shape policy in the UK and around the world. And Brown is perpetually engaged in trying to implement change for social justice, as he has been for most of his life.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Today Brown is renewing his call for the government to abandon the two-child benefit cap. As usual with Brown, there is always a plan, and the former PM is promoting a report from the IPPR thinktank explaining how fairer gambling taxes could raise \u00a33.2bn that would pay for the two-child benefit cap to be scrapped. He has written about this in an article in today\u2019s Guardian.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">And he was promoting this in an interview in the 8.10 slot on the Today programme.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Brown was chancellor for 10 years and <strong>Amol Rajan<\/strong>, the presenter, was keen to get him to talk, not just about gambling and child poverty, but the government\u2019s wider fiscal problems. Mostly Brown tried to avoid being sucked into this debate. But at one point he could not hold back, and he suggested that some parts of defence spending should be exempt from the fiscal rules, to ensure the security budget could rise without cuts having to be made elsewhere. This was interesting not just as a stand-alone policy idea, but as an example out-of-the-box thinking could help Rachel Reeves dig herself out of the hole she is currently in.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\"><strong>Brown<\/strong> said:<\/p>\n<p>Look, there\u2019s one thing that\u2019s happened over the last few months that has been quite unprecedented \u2013 to spend 5% on defence expenditure, as we want to spend [into the] 2030s.<\/p>\n<p>But this is a Nato initiative. This is a European initiative. We should be doing this jointly.<\/p>\n<p>We should have either jointly issued bonds or a Nato defence fund, and we should be sharing the cost across the continent, and that should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules, and that would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.<\/p>\n<p>We should be negotiating with our Nato partners to do this at the moment. And I believe these are the kind of things that we can do to sort out some of the problems that we have for the future.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Reeves is on a visit where she is due to speak to the media later. Presumably, we will get her response then.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">I will post more from Brown\u2019s interview shortly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The main event in the diary today is the interest rate announcement from the Bank of England at noon, followed by Andrew Bailey, the governor, holding a press conference at 12.30pm. <strong>Graeme Wearden<\/strong> will be covering this on his business live blog.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Reeves is on a visit in south Wales, and she is due to speak to the media around lunchtime. There may also be some politics coming out of the Edinburgh fringe, where Ian Murray, the Scottish secretary, and Kate Forbes, the Scottish deputy first minister, are both due to be speaking at events.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can\u2019t read all the messages BTL, but if you put \u201cAndrew\u201d in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can\u2019t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.<\/p>\n<p>Share<\/p>\n<p>Updated at\u00a004.32 EDT<\/p>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yvette Cooper says first migrants have been detained under &#8216;one in, one out&#8217; deal, prior to being sent back to France Migrants who arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel have been detained under the new \u201cone in, one out\u201d deal, PA Media reports. PA says: The first detentions came as people arrived<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14505,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[696,8134,2918,132,364,124],"class_list":{"0":"post-14504","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics","8":"tag-deal","9":"tag-detained","10":"tag-france","11":"tag-live","12":"tag-people","13":"tag-politics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14504"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14504\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/14505"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}