{"id":14024,"date":"2025-08-04T18:44:24","date_gmt":"2025-08-04T18:44:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/?p=14024"},"modified":"2025-08-04T18:44:24","modified_gmt":"2025-08-04T18:44:24","slug":"dont-wait-for-permission-to-write-for-the-public","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naijaglobalnews.org\/?p=14024","title":{"rendered":"Don\u2019t Wait for Permission to Write for the Public"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n<\/p>\n

Welcome to the first installment of my monthly column, \u201cThe Public Scholar,\u201d in which I invite academics and other experts to step forward\u2014thoughtfully, clearly and with purpose\u2014to help shape public conversations that matter. In this space, I\u2019ll offer practical, field-tested strategies for turning academic expertise into public impact, including how to know if an idea is op-ed\u2013worthy, how to turn a classroom anecdote into publishable prose, how to know when it\u2019s time to query a literary agent about your book idea and more.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m Susan D\u2019Agostino, a mathematician whose stories have been published in The Atlantic<\/em>, the BBC, Scientific American<\/em>, The Washington Post<\/em>, The<\/em> Financial Times<\/em>, Wired<\/em>, Quanta<\/em> and other leading publications. (You may recall that I wrote with some frequency about math and technology for Inside Higher Ed<\/em> a couple of years ago.) My last book, How to Free Your Inner Mathematician<\/em> (Oxford University Press, 2020), won the Mathematical Association of America\u2019s Euler Book Prize for an exceptionally well-written book with a positive impact on the public\u2019s view of math. My next book, How Math Will Save Your Life<\/em>, to be published by W.\u00a0W. Norton, makes the case for harnessing mathematical thinking in the face of personal and global crises.<\/p>\n

But none of that came easily or automatically. A decade ago, I was a tenured mathematics professor who had spent years honing proofs and lectures. Yet amid lagging public math literacy, I felt an unshakable urge to reach beyond the walls of academia and write for the public. Still, I\u00a0hesitated. Was my voice or expertise welcome outside of peer-reviewed journals? Did I have the authority to write for readers I could not picture in a seminar room? Did I even know how?<\/p>\n

That transition\u2014from academic to public scholar\u2014was bumpy. I made mistakes. I received more rejections than I care to count. (Stay tuned for a future column about all those rejections!) I had to unlearn some academic habits and relearn how to communicate with clarity for broad audiences. But step by step, I found my way.<\/p>\n

You don\u2019t need to leave higher ed to write for the public. And you certainly don\u2019t need permission. Academia often trains scholars to seek approval\u2014through grants, press offices and peer-reviewed publications. But the reality is that institutional support often follows after a scholar gains visibility. You already have the credentials to write for the public in your area of expertise. Now you need the courage and practical tips for doing so.<\/p>\n

Maybe you\u2019re a historian who sees how your field illuminates today\u2019s political divides. Or a scientist concerned about climate change, misinformation or public health. Or an artist reflecting on what the arts can\u2014and do\u2014offer society. Or a literary scholar exploring how stories shape our moral imaginations. Or an educator with hard-won insights into what learning looks like in today\u2019s classrooms. If you feel the tug to engage beyond campus gates, this column is for you.<\/p>\n

Many academics assume that public writing takes time away from scholarship. But making your work accessible to a wide audience forces you to think harder, not less. How can you distill the central argument of your research so that an intelligent friend with no training in your field can understand? Why should they care? Honing translation skills is an art. Your goal is to show up with clarity and generosity.<\/p>\n

As a bonus, crafting the occasional op-ed can energize your research and teaching\u2014not distract from it. You can clarify your ideas and receive real-time feedback on your argument and may even attract collaborators. Public writing can also be personally restorative. It reconnects you with the real-world questions that made you fall for your field. Your op-ed may even catch the eye of a literary agent or editor who\u2019s interested in discussing book ideas. Also, your willingness to be a novice again may offer credibility among students, as that\u2019s what many are wrestling with in your classroom. <\/p>\n

When I began writing in public-facing newspapers and magazines, I felt newly connected to issues that mattered beyond academia. While campus conversations are vital and intellectually rich, I found that engaging the broader public offered a different kind of clarity and urgency\u2014to respond to a moment unfolding in real time and to make research relevant to people\u2019s lives.<\/p>\n

Scholars across disciplines have watched with rising unease as the Trump administration has terminated research grants, dismissed government scientists without cause and wielded funding as a cudgel against universities. In this atmosphere, it can be tempting to self-censor or to wait for more hospitable times.<\/p>\n

But the cost of silence must be weighed against the consequences of inaction. Public conversations\u2014about health care, history, science, democracy, libraries, public art and education\u2014unfold every day, with or without scholars who can offer nuance, evidence and context.<\/p>\n

\u201cOpinions are most malleable before they are fully formed,\u201d wrote Lisa Fazio, a psychology professor at Vanderbilt whose federal grant for misinformation research was terminated. \u201cWe must not shy away from the spotlight.\u201d<\/p>\n

Fazio\u2019s warning is especially resonant now, as academics face mounting pressure from funding threats to political scrutiny. These pressures are real, and they are unevenly distributed. As University of Washington computer scientist Kate Starbird, also a target for her work on misinformation, told Science <\/em>magazine, \u201cI never had the option of keeping my head down.\u201d<\/p>\n

And yet: Sharing knowledge, humanizing data and contextualizing history are profound acts of public service in consequential times. The OpEd Project puts it plainly: \u201cIf you say things of consequence, there may be consequences. The alternative is to be inconsequential.\u201d<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s some good news: Editors at newspapers and magazines want academic voices in the mix, and they\u2019re often willing collaborators in helping your ideas rise above the noise. Editors want assurance that you are trained in your area of expertise, but they are less concerned with titles or tenure than your academic colleagues. Whether you\u2019re a graduate student, an adjunct, new on the tenure track or a full professor, what matters is your voice, your argument and your ability to meet the moment. <\/p>\n

Ready to begin? Here are a few prompts to spark your first (or next) op-ed:<\/p>\n